That's not even the problem, the biggest problem is it doesn't reach its own goals. You should be able to use Rust without using Unsafe, otherwise it doesn't solve the problem it claims to solve (or rather, it solves them in a "good enough" fashion, the same as smart pointers in C++ and there's no reason to switch from one to the other).

It's pretty clear you're lying.

After a few failures, I generally give up using an LLM and look elsewhere.

Always P=NP is true for some subset of the problem.

Every time I see someone talking about AI being a junior developer, I am quite certain they have never worked with a junior developer.

You are accusing MIT of committed scientific fraud. You better have evidence if you're going to accuse someone of that.

But you don't. You didn't even read the paper. You're just an asshole.

Most of the Indian H1B visa holders I've worked with have been pretty good at their job.

I've come to accept that this as true, and further conjecture that bloat is often a corporate/institutional goal.

This seems to be a joke, but in reality corporate incentives are aligned to make things more bloated. If you're a manager, then the more people you have under you, the more power you have. This means you want your people to go slower so you have to hire more of them.

I don't have a solution but there must be one.

Now, yes, there are predictions that you could get a supermassive black hole launched into space, especially during a galaxy merger if the velocity of the smaller black hole exceeds the escape velocity of the combined galaxy.

But I'd be wary of assuming that it's a launched black hole, unless we can find the merger it comes from. There may be ways for such a black hole to form that cause the stars to be launched away rather than the black hole being flung, and if a galaxy isn't rotating fast enough to be stable, one could imagine that a sufficiently small galaxy was simply consumed by its central black hole. Both of these would seem to produce exactly the same outcome, if all we have is the black hole itself and a velocity.

I'm not going to say either of these is likely in this case, or that astronomers haven't examine them (they almost certainly have), but rather that we should be cautious until we've a clearer idea of what the astronomers have actually been able to determine or rule out.

Finding an internship isn't easy, though.

I've wondered about that, too.

It's not a paradise either, so you should have known there was something wrong with that phrase.

(Fun fact: the Soviet Union never claimed to be communist. They claimed they were working towards that goal, well aware that they hadn't achieved it. The goal? A world where man does not exploit man. It's still a worthy goal)

Which absurdity are you thinking of? (Because it's not like the non-communist world lacks absurdity).

I am sympathetic to creators (including Google) who are harmed by new technology.

But where is the harm? I don't see anywhere in the article where Google even alleges harm was caused.

That's probably true.