Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Democrats too (Score 1) 116

When I worked at the DNC, our practices for composing the email list left a lot to be desired. They were notionally opt-in, we didn't intentionally buy spam lists, but if "someone" dropped your email address into a form on our web page, we didn't ask twice. And I know for sure that a couple of my own email addresses that should not have found their way onto the list did so, seemingly by collection from downstream politicians' lists who had been even more careless about their list collection. I doubt that has changed for the better.

As near as I could tell, the RNC's practices were worse.

Comment *Has* to Be a Scam (Score 1) 47

Previous comments have been drawing analogies to Black Mirror, but this "idea" goes back much further...

...This is an episode of Max Headroom (US version).

Specifically, S02E02: "Deities." A company claims to be able to bring past loved ones back to "life" as an AI, for a modest recurring fee. But Bryce (the creator of Max Headroom) opines they can't possibly have the compute power to do it, as it requires a large mainframe just to run Max's highly flawed, glitching bust.

Wouldn't surprise me if the "visionaries" behind this saw that episode, and saw an opportunity to fleece gullible rubes.

Comment Re:Generation ship (Score 1) 174

You said it yourself: the heritability is 0.8. When you start with people at the top of the scale, the second generation won't be average but they also won't be as smart as their parents. The third generation will be dumber still.

Yes, after multiple generations they eventually reach a new stability point with higher than the original average intelligence of the human race. But that new mean is far below the intelligence of the original group that set out, and includes a significant number of individuals who are not mentally competent to maintain and operate a spaceship.

Submission + - Debian 13 trixie arrives with RISC-V support and updated Linux kernel (nerds.xyz)

BrianFagioli writes: After more than two years (wow!) of development, Debian 13 âoetrixieâ has officially been released. The new stable version will receive five years of support from the Debian Security team and the Long Term Support team, continuing the projectâ(TM)s tradition of reliability.

This release includes updated desktop environments such as GNOME 48, KDE Plasma 6.3, LXDE 13, LXQt 2.1.0, and Xfce 4.20. There are over 14,100 new packages, more than 44,000 updated ones, and around 8,800 that have been removed as obsolete. The codebase now spans more than 1.46 billion lines.

Key software updates include the Linux kernel 6.12 LTS, LibreOffice 25.2, GCC 14.2, OpenJDK 21, PostgreSQL 17, PHP 8.4, Python 3.13, LLVM/Clang 19, GIMP 3.0.4, Apache 2.4.64, Nginx 1.26, MariaDB 11.8, and systemd 257.

A major change in this release is the official addition of riscv64 support, making it possible to run Debian on 64-bit RISC-V hardware. Debian 13 supports seven architectures in total. However, this release also ends i386 as a standard architecture and is the last version to support armel.

The Debian team has continued to improve reproducible builds, added 64-bit time_t support for dates beyond 2038, and optimized cloud images for Amazon EC2, Microsoft Azure, OpenStack, and PlainVM. For those who want to try it before installing, live images are available for amd64 and arm64 in multiple desktop environments.

Comment Generation ship (Score 1) 174

The classic problem with a generation ship isn't engineering, it's biological reversion to the mean.

You pull 400 crew from the brightest, best qualified of the 8 billion people on Earth. Their children will be smarter than the average human, but not nearly as smart as their parents. And the third generation will be dumber still as the average intelligence and competence ebbs toward the overall human average.

Can a team of essentially random people plucked off the street keep an interstellar spaceship in good working order and successfully deal with unexpected crises? It seems unlikely. Our best and brightest could, but they'll only be around for the first half century.

Submission + - I ordered vintage tech. Ebay deliberately destroyed it (ebay.com)

ayjaym writes: The HP65. The world's first hand-held programmable calculator. One flew on the Apollo-Soyuz missions as a backup to the main computer system.
So when I saw one listed on eBay, I immediately purchased it from the US seller. It was to be dispatched via ebay's Global Fulfilment Program. From previous experience I knew this was a tortuous process; items can take a month to travel from the US to the UK.
What I didn't know is that there was a random chance of my item being deliberately destroyed by eBay. One moment it was at the 'inspection' stage, prior to being shipped, and then, just like that — like the 'lifesystems terminated' chilling message in 2001 — it was gone. "Item failed inspection". "Item liquidated".
I contacted eBay support. No, we can't tell you why. No, both parties will be refunded. No, the item won't be returned to the seller. It will be destroyed.
Why?. Well — who knows. There were no batteries, no toxic chemicals. Just a calculator. An irreplaceable piece of vintage tech, deliberately destroyed for reasons utterly unknown.
And this isn't an isolated incident. The opaque 'inspection' step apparently quite often triggers random rejection, usually with the destruction of the item. Antiques, coins, you name it. Nobody knows and few care because both parties get their money back. Except — an irreplaceable piece of tech history has now been destroyed, and I feel responsible. All I wanted to do was restore it, and now I've been the agent of its destruction. It's heartbreaking.

Slashdot Top Deals

They are called computers simply because computation is the only significant job that has so far been given to them.

Working...