Comment Re:Time to dump Cursor (Score 1) 39
Given the current government, I don't find that evidence of anything except that somebody in government doesn't like them. Perhaps evidence will show up at the trial, if they actually follow through.
Given the current government, I don't find that evidence of anything except that somebody in government doesn't like them. Perhaps evidence will show up at the trial, if they actually follow through.
They aren't bullshit concepts, but they also aren't even nearly practical now. Give it time. The Dyson sphere (practical variation) would need at least several centuries to be practical, and even then I think topopolis is a better approach, but it's not a bullshit concept. The "space AI" probably needs sustained space-based industry to become practical, and that, itself, has a few problems to overcome, but it's reasonable eventually.
The LLM fans seem to believe in magic.
That's always been a characteristic of AI believers. That's where the idea of the AI singularity comes from, magical thinking.
The encyclopedia doesn't explain how to make explosives because that's not its job. The anarchist's cookbook sort of does but it's dangerous to follow because some of the recipes are very bad, but even that has been determined to not be illegal. And some of the recipes WILL work, and those aren't illegal either. If you go to the library you can get a plan for a nuclear weapon or a gun.
It's not just information being provided, it's how it's couched. The LLM presents its bullshit to you as a gift in celebration of your intelligence.
If the tool does not have an intent, it cannot discourage anything.
Not true. We design tools with warnings to discourage misuse. We can design a software tool the same way. It can detect keywords and issue warnings. But you can't do it reliably at the LLM level because you cannot do ANYTHING reliably with a LLM, you need to wrap something around it.
Elon has an AI platform, and that platform lacks the IDE integration that others have, so my guess is he's looking to plug that hole with money.
If Grok could do what he claims it could do, he could have it write the software for him and not spend anything.
But the company providing the technology also has some agency in the matter. How much it's reasonable to argue about,
It's worse than the halting problem, because different cpus will have different errors and error handling.
You mean just like lawyers and programmers?
"The biggest problem with education in the US is the educators. There is no getting past that. Record spending per pupil"
Too bad you know nothing about anything. Educators are buying school supplies because they don't have enough budget to run their classes. If you actually knew any teachers you wouldn't talk this ignorant shit. It's administration and consultants that are eating up all of the funding.
Which explains bsky, what a bugfest.
Nothing infuriates a socialist more than individual liberties.
Nothing triggers a capitalist douchebag who doesn't care about other people faster than hearing someone say that an economy should work for all its citizens, not only the privileged.
It might be, if demand weren't outstripping supply in most of the world.
As such, that's a truly crap pronouncement.
This is the age of AI-driven scarcity.
1. A fair price is a price that two parties agree to assuming no duress caused by the other party
You're ignoring duress by society, of which both parties are a part, making it an inseparable party to the exchange.
Hahhaahahahhahaahhahahahahhahaha
Professional wrestling: ballet for the common man.