Comment Poisoning people for profit? (Score 1) 1
Hell yes! It is the American Way!
Hell yes! It is the American Way!
Actually, he is relevant in this case.
Indeed. Small? WTF? Cannot have that! We need to take IMMEDIATE steps to make our Ozone-hole the largest and most magnificent!
No argument about that. Applies not only to governments, but to anybody that want power in order to control people (that is why most, but not all people go into politics). Hence religion, cults, company structures, even some people in groups of social media have this. It boils down to dominance in some form and it not a positive personality trait.
The real question is whether SEGA or Phil Collins's label will sue first.
Much of the DOGE commission's responsibility had been moved to the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for the past several months. See "DOGE 'cut muscle, not fat'; 26K experts rehired after brutal cuts" by Ashley Belanger
The lecturer is there to read the room and be responsive to what's necessary to get the points across, otherwise may as well just read it in a book
Yes, very much so. Sometimes it is hard, but the better the rapport you build with the students, the better it works. Talking to them in breaks helps. Showing the occasional weakness helps. If some student know something relevant better than you, let them talk for a few minutes. Of course, some students want the degree, but not do the work (which is really stupid, but it happens) and that is why I have stopped teaching mandatory subjects. If you do not really want to be in my lecture, I do not want you to be there either.
What kind of a nonsense posting is that? Stop projecting and read what I actually wrote.
The primary job of a lecturer is design of the lecture, select the material and structure it.
If that was true then we don't need lecturers anymore since all the material already exists.
That would require that there are no more and no less than the materials required in existence. The problem students face is not lack of materials. The problem is they are faced with vastly more materials than they need and most do not yet have the skills to competently make a selection and structure structure what they selected.
Other than that, I agree with your statement.
Indeed. Also reminds me of a certain "stable genius".
If you can't figure out how to use this stuff, it's on you at this point.
I know how to use this stuff: Stay away from it, it adds nothing and wastes my time. Oh, I have one use: I currently have a student evaluate the major coding assistant and some general LLMs on how good they can judge code security. The results so far are that they work well for toy examples and not well or not at all for real situations. This may eventually get me a nice publication.
While I do not completely agree, the idea has merit.
The IBM 2250 is impressive ... if you compare it with a system selling for a tenth its price. -- D. Cohen