I said "their traditions".
Even if some of them have chosen to drop their traditions, that is still a part of the history of their religion. Christians have their share of history and varied degrees of practice too.
So do you embrace and protect historical traditions, or do you force them to change? And if you're forcing them to change to conform to your views what's one tradition vs another?
If you have gas appliances and no venting - welcome to the worl of oxygen deprivation.
I remember a fair number of people in the '80s getting fooled by Eliza, a collection of heuristics designed to create the illusion that the computer understood what was being types and formulating reasoned responses. Of course, it was doing no such thing.
Modern chatbots do a much better job of it. 'Good' enough that susceptible adults sometimes go over the edge into a full mental health crisis after a month or so interacting with them.
The constant affirmation and un-wavering support makes the chatbots the ultimate yes-man. We have all seen what happens when celebrities and people in power become drunk on their own yes-men.
It's worse than internet echo-chambers. At least those don't tend to let the conversation get that personal and specific. Chatbots will get as personal as you wnt and they are designed to never break engagement (how will the company keep gathering underpants if the chatbot keeps saying no?).
And all of that with adults. Now imagine turning all of that on a young teen that hasn't had time to mature enough to know better. YIPE!
I understand being de-spirited by the current Administration.
As this sentence was obviously generated by AI, who is the "I" being referred to?
Define "works fine". From what I can see core features of Windows 11 fail without TPM
Which core feature doesn't work on Windows 11 without TPM?
100% of Americans want the time changes to go away.
I don't even notice it anymore ever since my clocks change automatically.
...when many of the most over-exposed techbro billionaires didn't finish college?
Is this actually true? I know we have some high profile examples in history but even amongst those like Gates and Zuckerberg while they didn't finish college they started their companies with connections made in those colleges. Pretty sure guys like Thiel and Sacks and Andreesen all have degrees, some multiple. I feel like this is a meme more than actual truth.
Also I think the more interesting statistic would be amongst those billionaires and millionaires how many of them make sure their own kids go to college and the best college they can possibly attend. That i would bet has a pretty high hit rate.
This.
Bill gates dropped out of Harvard, not a Cert II in Nail Care.
They also had wealthy parents.
As for rich people, yep, they are completely different. Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson went to Eton collage and then Oxford because his family had connections and could afford the fees. He studied Literae humaniores (that's classic literature for the lay person, he read a bunch of old books) and at the end of which, his family used their connections to get him a job where he'd get a good salary. He went on to become a tabloid columnist and then politician, before joining the conservative party he probably contributed very little to the economic situation in the UK, after joining the conservatives he definitely worsened it.
You see the last point quite frequently in professional jobs. I call them Tarquins (gratuitous Hyacinth/KAP reference), a Tarquin is someone who basically did the minimum they could in education knowing their family would take care of the results. They're usually not very bright and only marketable skill is being a minor child (3rd of 4th son in old money) of someone important who golfs with a company director who gave them a job. Befitting their connection they can't be shoved down in the mail room, they have to be given something important to do, however being utterly incompetent and motivated enough to do something that could be dangerous they need someone to watch them to make sure they don't do any damage, yes a minder. This is how you can tell your boss hates you, they make you the Tarquin minder.
Boris Alexander dePiffel Johnson is the exact reason that Tarquins need a minder because he's an example of what happens when they get the chance to do something important and clearly have no idea what they're doing and no clue that they have no idea.
be more supportive than the kids parents! WTF? That is clearly the cause of her suicide -not depression, not her family ignoring the signs
People who are experiencing suicidal thoughts are often very good at hiding it from those closest to them. At a minimum, bots of this nature should require parental permission to access and should alert a responsible adult when the child begins sharing any thoughts of self-harm.
At that point the parent has failed long ago.
Also if the parents aren't the caring type, they won't bother with parental controls, if they're the overbearing type that think they can lock their kid away from anything they don't like, they're delusional as the kid will find a way around it.
Daring to suggest the parents are responsible is a quick way to get modded down but it doesn't change the fact it's true.
If your kid feels the need to hide the way they're feeling from you, you're a bad parent. Sorry, not sorry. Your job as a parent is to prepare your child for adulthood, not lock them away from anything you consider unsafe, impure or too adult for them and then delude yourself that your attempts are actually working until the day they turn 18 and magically expect them to handle the stressors of the adult world.
As a child goes into adolescence they're going to be exposed to more and more of the adult world. Perhaps less being exposed to it and more being able to understand it, however they won't fully understand it and in many cases won't have the knowledge or experience to handle it. A parent can either become someone their child can trust to come to with embarrassing and serious issues or someone who the teen is scared of... In the latter case they'll end up seeking others to help them and many of those will not have good intentions.
Granted, few children with caring and competent parents will be experiencing suicidal thoughts to the point where they feel acting on them is the only remaining course of action (been there, done that, literally have the scars to prove it).
Also teens have been committing suicide long before the advent of AI or the internet. Blaming AI is just another attempt at deflection from parents who are desperately looking for anyone to blame but themselves.
Even the most casual study of divinity will show that almost all religions consider simply thinking of some things is a "sin". Almost all religions grant mankind free will, and the supreme being (call them what you may) "allows" for the "choice of sin".
So, by prohibiting "sin", they are, in effect, declaring themselves to be smarter than their Deity, who, in The Wisdom of that Deity, granted the ability to "sin".
I'm pretty sure that's not how that works.
This is how religious control works,
1. Declare that something normal and natural is a "sin".
2. Everyone sins.
3. The get-out from your sin is to be forgiven by religious authorities. Of course only the deity can forgive sin but the deity has representatives on earth that is totally not doing this for their own benefit and power.
4. Once forgiven, people go out and commit more sin.
5. Rinse and repeat.
Remember that it won't take much for this state of affairs to come to western nations. The US was always half way there, now it seem that it's 3/4 of the way there but those of us over this side of the pond had best not kid ourselves, the fascists in Europe will happily co-opt religion to get and hold onto power.
No religious war or state has ever benefited god, only men and only a few men at that.
Why stop at WiFi?
The author doesn't know the differences between WiFi, fiber and the internet.
Well this is a religious decree based on religious grounds... Stop expecting it to make sense.
And to a lot of people, WiFi is synonymous with internet. People who believe in religion so strongly they will fight wars to have it enforced tend not to be very bright to begin with.
Two is not equal to three, even for large values of two.