Ford made the news because they were complaining about not being able to find 5,000 Machinists but it turns out the reason they can't get those workers is they built the factory in the middle of nowhere and nobody wants to live out in the middle of nowhere for a job where they can be laid off at any time without any other jobs around. It's basically a company town at that point and you're fucked if you live there because it's only a matter of time.

Meanwhile even if the factories come back the jobs don't because the vast majority of the other work is automated. 5,000 machinists sounds great but that's for auto work. Most of the stuff we make these days as a species can be made by robots and machines. So you can do all the tariffs you want and you might get the factories back here but you aren't getting the jobs.

The only reason you see so many people in factories overseas is there paid slave labor wages and if they try to unionize their fascist government just kills them and harvests their organs.

They're all good reasons to use tariffs to force industries to come back even if we don't get the jobs. Not having semiconductors built here as a national security concern.

But we need to stop talking about bringing back jobs with tariffs because that's just not going to happen.

So the trouble is that they aren't really quite becoming Banks. Like the article says they aren't becoming consumer Banks like we are used to seeing they're becoming trust Banks which aren't regulated like you would expect.

However you can bet your ass that they are going to advertise that they are banks and heavily imply that your deposits are FDIC insured.

If a Democrat is in the White House at the time they implode some of them might go to jail but you're still not going to get your money back.

And eventually a republican will get control of the White House and pardon them so they'll do a few years in jail and walk away with hundreds of millions of dollars.

Since it is also an impossible outcome, there is not even a need to discuss it.

These days, getting along with China is much easier than getting along with the US.

But I guess the average US household is really rich and can easily afford much more expensive cars.

Tariffs are a bad thing from a pure economic perspective. They introduce inefficiencies, and make things more expensive. This is a basic concept of macroeconomics.

However, some things are more important than making the most money. Among them, national defense. In America, both parties have decided they don't want to work with China anymore, for varying reasons of ideology, ethics, and self defense. And they have decided that is more important to them than economic efficiencies.

Really? Don’t look now, but you just gave about a dozen reasons why people are still on cable and prefer it. Describe that nightmare process to anyone paying for cable 30 years ago and they would have laughed non-stop. “Modern” conveniences of the future my ass.

And if the iPhone has already taken more pictures than any other camera ever, it stands to reason humans have wasted at least eleventy seven billion more hours scrolling through 4,000 streaming channels across a dozen streaming services filled with half-subscriptions they might get to find something to watch, vs. 200 channels of get-what-you-see TV with one guide, one gate, and one price.

K.I.S.S. is a timeless concept for valid reason. Yup. Cord cutters were bragging back in the day. For about five fucking seconds.

Just don’t sit too close while looking for Santa’s workshop, masturbating about all the gifts you’ll get soon.

You’ll go blind.

And if your face stays like that, people will know why.

Disney requires specific channels to be at the basic tier of a multichannel video provider's offering, not a "sports" tier. Last I checked (today), multichannel IPTV provider Sling worked around this by offering two different basic plans: "Orange" with ESPN and other Disney properties and "Blue" with more channels but no Disney. Orange subscribers can add the extra Blue channels on a second "Orange & Blue" tier.

CBN operated from 1977 through 1997, showing ads starting in 1981 and taking the name The Family Channel in 1988. Beginning in 1997, CBN was reduced to a paid programming arrangement to show The 700 Club on what is now Disney's Freeform channel. There are, however, numerous other religious channels under a viewer donation arrangement like what you describe, such as EWTN. And in 2008, CBN started a second channel called CBN News, first online and then with a handful of broadcast affiliates.

It's likely intended for military purposes (or more precisely, an attempt to get funding to build them for military purposes).

But everything I said was a fact. If that makes you uncomfortable what the hell does that say about you?

Because at this time nobody knows how far off this is or whether it is even possible. LLMs are certainly not the way there.

So apparently Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald Trump sucked Bill Clinton's dick and Vladimir Putin has the pictures.

Stop, read that again, Google it, and just Jesus fucking Christ what the hell is wrong with our world?

Anyway, I doubt Trump sucked Clinton's dick. Although given some of the freaky shit guys at ivy League schools do in those gentlemen's clubs who the hell knows? The point of something like that would be to have pictures so that both sides could use them for mutually assured destruction...

I think it's much more likely though that Epstein was exaggerating for effect but that Putin really does have some extremely damning compromat on Donald Trump.

MAGA could watch Donald Trump rape their own babies and they would somehow blame Obama.

When we say it's a cult that's what we mean.