Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re: wait, what? (Score 1) 65

"Driver hits unleashed dog that darted into street" is just a Tuesday, but "autonomous vehicle hits^w makes contact with unleashed dog that darted into street" is a headline because it is so rare.

I'm not so sure there have even been enough incidents to decide if Waymos are more or less likely to run over an animal, but I *STRENUOUSLY* object to trying to soften it with 'made contact with' in the press release.

Comment Re:wait, what? (Score 2) 65

Last I checked the local government said so. They have indemnified waymo in every market they have launched their taxi service. I don't think that would hold up if they killed a human being, at least not one that isn't homeless, but so far it's held up for the more minor stuff that's happened.

Basically waymo cannot be cited for traffic violations and killing a pet is just a traffic violation. The most they could be held responsible for would be the value of the pet which is usually under $100.

Comment Re:Much as I enjoy mocking Russia... (Score 1) 75

"Don't dare ask myself" ?! "Don’t CARE to admit or accept" ? Au fucking contraire, I totally concur that the shortcomings of the previous administrations led to Trump being elected. But their uselessness is over, their punishment (Trump being elected) has been dealt out, and the world's problem NOW is Trump working for aggressor Russia and betraying victim Ukraine.

Their uselessness isn’t over as long as a demented media is still defending the shit they did by trying to dismiss, forget, or ignore it. America is the actual victim of Didn’t Earn It incompetence. And as you freely admit, they didn’t leave behind a dismissible mess that is “over”. Not by a long shot.

Ask YOURSELF who Trump is working for. Hint: It's not the USA.

Fine. I will ask the US Citizen Veteran and proud father how he feels about an American President keeping American soldiers out of that war. It’ll help clarify exactly who Trump knows he’s working for. Would you still be defending a fucking auto pen sending 18-year old American kids into a meat grinder? Trump wasn’t a win. It was a necessity.

Perspective, holds significant value to educate and enlighten. If this is the “worlds problem” then maybe the other thirty-one fucking members of NATO should get off their ass and do more. Ask yourself why they’re not.

Comment Too Big To Fail schedule. (Score 1) 35

It is *never* a good sign when the CEO requires daily meetings. It means he does not have faith in his team to meet targets. They're grown-ass adults -- they don't need to be micro-managed.

My old CEO used to arrive by 6AM every morning to the plant. He would walk through and have a brief chat face to face with people in every department. The man would probably cover a mile or two every morning doing this. Always polite. Always respectful. Always engaged. He was one of the best CEOs I’ve ever worked for. There’s a difference in being engaged and micromanaging.

If you think this particular CEO is micromanaging, imagine the fiduciary pressure to deliver being orders of magnitude larger than 99.999% of companies that have ever existed, because your gone-viral pre-IPO stock ticker is already a household name. Doubt you’d feel comfortable with anything less than a daily schedule when the failure of your company could already cause a crash in the very market they’re not even fully in yet.

Submission + - Why meetings can harm employee well-being (phys.org)

alternative_right writes: On average, managers spend 23 hours a week in meetings. Much of what happens in them is considered to be of low value, or even entirely counterproductive. The paradox is that bad meetings generate even more meetings in an attempt to repair the damage caused by previous ones.

A 2015 handbook laid the groundwork for the nascent field of "Meeting Science". Among other things, the research revealed that the real issue may not be the number of meetings, but rather how they are designed, the lack of clarity about their purpose, and the inequalities they (often unconsciously) reinforce.

Faced with what we call meeting madness, the solution is not to eliminate meetings altogether, but to design them better. It begins with a simple but often forgotten question: why are we meeting?

Comment It's not that we are angry (Score 1) 91

It's that we all know this is a grift and we're all trying to figure out how the grift works.

I can think of a few possible things but I don't have enough of a finance background to really say for sure of what they are up to, but I know damn well that billionaires don't just hand out billions of dollars for the hell of it. There is a reason that Bill Gates is still one of the wealthiest people on the planet despite telling us 20 years ago he was going to give away his fortune.

Billionaires have been lying to us for as long as we've had billionaires, some of us just figured that out

Comment So it's not the worst thing (Score 1) 91

But given this administration's history of corrupting everything they touch it's not something we should get behind from this administration because it's almost guaranteed to turn into some kind of scam that puts money in their pockets.

There is nothing wrong with a sovereign wealth fund per se if your government is relatively uncorrupted. Ours is not, the Trump administration is without a doubt the most corrupt and criminal administration in American history and that is saying a lot.

Simply put you cannot expect good things to come out of this administration even if the underlining ideas are fine. And I don't think that's any kind of exaggeration or partisan bickering. The Trump administration is openly murdering Venezuelan fishermen in the lead up to another war for oil without even the slightest pretexts. That alone should tell you we are in for a bad time. You don't have to be a genius to extrapolate from that data point and the dozens of other data points like the illegal tariffs or the huge bribes like the cryptocurrency or the jet Qatar gave the Trump or the fact that the taxpayer is going to be retro fitting that jet for his use...

Comment It's probably not vote buying (Score 1) 91

If I had to guess, and it's just a guess, I would say that they are positioning themselves to profit from the money put aside for the kids. Probably sitting themselves up to redirect the money being invested in the companies that they own.

The one thing we can be sure of though is that this is a scam and the only question is what are the details of the scam.

You don't become a billionaire by being altruistic. People who genuinely care about society at Large stop accumulating wealth long before they become billionaires. To become a billionaire requires a certain level of sociopathy. There's a reason why the old phrase, never ask a Man how he made his first million, exists. That phrase has been around so long that a million dollars isn't a lot of money anymore but you get the idea.

Comment Trump is gearing up for a third term (Score 1) 91

The supreme Court has overruled 94% of the lower court rulings Trump has lost. It's painfully obvious they will just rubber stamp anything Trump wants. More importantly anything the heritage foundation and Peter thiel wants. Trump can't stay awake through an entire cabinet meeting so it's not so much that he wants anything but he would like to stay in power because he is making billions of corruption and bribes.

Meanwhile the Republican party does not have a viable candidate for 2028. Vance is a joke and a couch fucker and the rest of them are so mired and scandal they are completely unelectable. None of them have Trump's Teflon because they aren't perceived as outsiders.

So the Republican party is going to run Trump unless Trump is physically incapable of running. Meanwhile the news media will protect Trump and will convince the public that it is perfectly normal for Trump to run for a third term. We saw this in 2024 with sane washing. Which is the practice of crazy shit Republicans do, especially anything crazy Trump does being reported as normal and good in the news media.

This probably isn't enough for Trump to actually win a third term but the Republican party will use common voter suppression tactics to stop enough casual voters from making it to the polls in order for Trump to win.

It is possible the voters won't buy into this but at the same time they did elect a felon with 28 credible rape accusations for a second term because he promised cheap eggs and because trans people gross them out...

And of course if anyone can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory it's the Democratic party. They are on track to nominate Gavin newsom and he's fine but I could easily see them coming up with some scandal to take him out so they can put yet another unpopular woman forward. There is a contingency of the Democrat party that is obsessed with the first female president and will do anything to get it. And unfortunately they have a lot of pull in the party...

So yeah Trump cares because Trump is going to run for a third term. This is why he's backing off on some of his tariffs

Comment Re: Wow... (Score 2, Interesting) 57

Also good luck getting that check. It can take years.

Florida in particular is a mess right now and nobody is doing anything to fix it. We've got a fuck ton of retirees who can't afford to move, aren't dying any time soon and are stuck in condos we know are likely to fail without expensive retrofits they can't afford. It's a miracle there hasn't been another collapse and we're just hoping they drop dead of old age before it hits them.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Imitation is the sincerest form of television." -- The New Mighty Mouse

Working...