Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Not good enough. (Score 1) 27

How about you let us "opt in" instead, so I don't waste my time, bandwidth, and electricity installing shit that I am going to want to immediately uninstall? Or are you counting on the fact that your software engineers are going to make the "opt-out" control impossible to find, and give big scary warnings that cause people to think twice so you can still maximize your data scraping?

Sounds like "opting out" of buying LG is still the right way to go.

Fighting to ensure we always have a way to suspend or manually control software updates no matter the vendor, sounds like the way to go.

If Microsoft has one smart TV vendor in their pocket, they have more. This behavior can get collusive real quick-like.

Comment Re:Will this make drivers relevant again? (Score 1) 36

The driver has become largely irrelevant in F1.

If we dropped all the driver names into a fishbowl and let them randomly be drawn, how many team owners would find relevancy real damn quick?

With lap times matching in sub-second intervals, I see your mostly irrelevant point. But skill does matter. A snippet of stats from the 2020 season shows there are statistically worse drivers:

Verstappen, Sainz Jr, Leclerc and Gasly were the only drivers to crash that finished in the top half of the drivers’ championship standings. Between them, they accounted for nine of the 26 crashed cars. This means that the bottom 10 drivers were responsible for the remaining 17, making them nearly twice as likely to crash.

Comment Re:Swearing is pure emotion (Score 1) 40

People who swear aren't trying to communicate meaning, they are communicating emotion. The specific words they speak have no relevance to what they are communicating. Emotion probably does push people to a heightened sense of strength.

Profanity as enhanced inflection to convey emotion in a story?

Hell yes. I award fifty points to House Fuckinstuff.

Comment Colors matter. (Score 1) 36

sooo F1 is now mario kart? this sounds so dumb.. maybe its still fun to watch? but reading it on paper it sounds like you should just give them all the same car and let them race

(Engineer) "Alright, activate corner mode."

(Driver) "Blue button. Got it."

(Engineer) "Clear for boost mode."

(Driver) "Green button. Sending."

Gut feeling is when you're forced to react that quickly on a race track to F1 political vernacular, you keep shit real simple.

Comment Re: so dumb (Score 1) 140

DEI policies make it more likely, not less likely, that actually competent people get hired.

(D)iversity - Hiring that prioritizes having a diverse group of humans, over competency whenever necessary, using quotas.

(E)quity - Hiring that prioritizes equal gender representation for all positions, over competency whenever necessary, using quotas. (NOTE: Really really hard jobs, don't count. Because that would be unfair.)

(I)nclusion - Hiring that prioritizes inclusion of all types and mental states, over competency whenever necessary, using quotas.

Explain the overtly denied and gross incompetence within the last administration instead of deflecting. I don't mind at all competing against anyone qualified for the job. That said, not so sure how this whole strong liberal feminist thing is gonna work out long-term. Overtly liberal feminism hasn't done enough to discourage 304 behavior as "empowering", which doesn't exactly create a disease-free, divorce-free dating pool chock full of honesty and accountability that men easily see as wife material and want to procreate with. Anti-depressants have become as normalized as abortion.

As far as nepo hires, can't really say I like that no matter who is guilty. But I really doubt you're going to out-shit-shine a wholly unqualified dishonorably discharged crackhead son working for an energy company in a country who ultimately received over $100 billion in warmongering funds from Daddy Big Guy, while a Bahamian crypto orgy washing machine was donating fat stacks to the DNC to fund those '22 mid-terms nicely. How convenient that's all gone now. Sponsored by Bleachbit and Total Recall Vacations, Inc.

Comment Wits vs. Twits. Round One. (Score 1, Interesting) 140

Motherfucker please, there isn't a single person in this administration who isn't a "DEI" hire. None are merit based.

Just remember. You asked for this.

Battle of the Minds, Round One:

Trump vs. Biden (a.k.a. The Big Guy, President Autopen), on anything he can recall coherently other than ice cream.

Vance vs. Harris (a.k.a. The Cackler, Open Border Czar), on word salads (allowed due to self-identified disability) and National Security.

Hegseth vs. Walz, on the benefits of masculinity.

Kennedy vs. Rachel Levine, on the value of Fathers and parental rights.

Gabbard vs. Harris, just because we deserve to see that mental bitch-slapping again.

I'd go on, but you really don't want me to get down to the Goggins level where Jocko strength is delivered with Musk wit at Shapiro speed. In summary, proving competency, fails the Didn't Earn It (DEI) sniff test.

Thank you for your contribution to the ongoing study to combat the crippling disease of long-TDS. As always, your input is greatly entertaining and mildly appreciated.

Comment Re:Attributing Risk Mitigation. (Score 1) 70

But then you wouldn't publish either that a Red Team has been able to infiltrate your business.

Depends on the legal necessity. The public ingests the broadcasted story no matter if it was an exercise or real. To them, a bad guy was caught with no real security risk and minor disruption on a single flight.

You would simply publish what is necessary. In this case, there were members of the public present who likely noticed or were directly impacted by the erratic behavior and disturbance. So 100% confidentiality was a known no-go from the start. Some exposure was certainly factored in, and so a press release with relevant detail is made after it is complete.

Red Teaming can be akin to "sources and methods" in law enforcement. Reveal what is legally necessary. Utilize the rest.

Comment Re:Attributing Risk Mitigation. (Score 1) 70

I agree. That's what it looks like. But wouldn't that hab been disclosed as soon as he was brought off the plane? Even if it takes an hour to confirm, that should have been before and included in a press release.

Included in the press release? Why? Internal Red Team testing is internal.

Take the win for catching the "bad" guy, with bonus clicks-n-likes revenue. Advertise there was no real threat (he went through security) to keep the confidence of overall safety intact with the general public. Water the "alarming" problem down to remedial training and perhaps firing a couple of ticket checkers who had one fucking job to ensure all is well.

Profit, with consumer confidence even slightly boosted just before the holiday rush.

Internal testing is often private because shareholders might not react too well finding out you had to fire all of your "security" team after a Red Team exercise. Yeah. I know. That pesky profit again.

Comment Attributing Risk Mitigation. (Score 3, Funny) 70

This guy either socially engineered his way through a line, analyzed a weakness in the line, or time-traveled from the '90's not realizing we've set up an incompetent but totalizing police-state control grid to interpose every tiny aspect of our lives.

Perhaps we not attribute time-traveling ignorance with what could be attributed to a Red Team pen test. He went through security. So creating an actual threat was not the end goal. Embarrassment and awareness was.

Hell, the way he was bouncing around the plane makes me wonder how much money he was winning in the Red Team office pool for every seat he got away with.

Red Team testing, is done at airports. (Source: Retired Director of TSA @ local international airpot)

Slashdot Top Deals

Success is something I will dress for when I get there, and not until.

Working...