That's a good question and I honestly can't say it's come up. My guess is that if you are in single user mode then the lock is ignored. But that is just a guess, I'll have to experiment with sometime.
Fail2ban has worked well for me over the years. It's pretty easy to set up given it's sane, sensible defaults. Not comparing it to denyhosts, haven't use that. Just noting an alternative...
www.fail2ban.org
I see this all the time too. PubKey authentication only, Fail2Ban and no root logins help to keep the log clutter to a minimum.
After finally weening myself off of using the root account locally I now just lock root completely. "sudo passwd -l root". Doesn't disable root so "sudo su -" still works but you can't login directly as root when the password is locked.
Although there is less traffic in the logs now I still get some entries before F2B kicks in and I find some of the non-root attempts very amusing... oracle, admin, ftp, PlcmSpIp, zhangyan
Some are obvious service user account attempts and some are just weird!
Hi, I was the original submitter. My summary was terse and simply contained a one line description of what I understood the article to be about and a quote of the last two sentences about pitting licenses against each other and the line that says "My name is Christopher Allan Webber. I fight for the users, and I'm standing up for the GPL.".
I agree that they took some editorial liberty and made it sound more controversial than I felt it was but I was still happy to see it posted as Christopher seemed to think it wouldn't get noticed and seemed peeved he wasn't able to respond to the talk at OSCON.
It was also the last talk of the night, and there was really no venue to respond to it
But it needs a response... even if the only venue I have at the moment is my blog. That'll do.
There is no reason to pit permissive and copyleft licensing against each other. Anyone doing so is doing a great disservice to user freedom. My name is Christopher Allan Webber. I fight for the users, and I'm standing up for the GPL.
There is no US analog, because the US has no legitimate interest here. We're only involved because our government is more than happy to roll over for the MPAA.
There is no "Sexual fraud" here, and there is historical evidence of both the US being willing to break international law as needed for MPAA interests alongside the evidence that the swedish prosecutor is refusing to follow standard swedish procedures which were openly supported by Assange.
Please, he wouldn't have even been sentenced in sweden. They'd hold up his case in court for 5 years with no representation and then send him to the US to be awaiting charges forever.
An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.