You have proof that half the sculptors of such things weren't female? I thought not

What pinup, the picture is of her face only. You prudes really need to properly integrate with society, or go to a muslim country where they keep tarps with eye holes on their women.

0h come on, you could say similar about the handsome/pretty models used in workstation/office furniture magazine.

But every single object you see in your daily life has buoyancy, it has to be corrected when weighing things very precisely. And am also amused at everyone spewing the 9.8 m/s^2, that's only at ONE certain distance from center of earth's mass, it varies by height and is NOT a constant at all. They are just spewing high school level simple model without understanding.

Switch to red wine, even more beneficial things in that as long as in moderation.

You blather without having done experiment. In point of fact acceleration due to gravity increases as distance decreases, it's not a constant. It also varies with position on the Earth. You are just spewing at a high school level of understanding, again without experimental proof

yes, and they have issues that a true rs-232c does not. I have to use a usb to serial often on my job for configuring certain network gear and initial configuration of big iron, it's less than ideal. When I'm in the home office I have an ancient laptop with a real serial and openbsd on it for that, it's much more robust when having to unplug and then plug into another device

The "soft science" in the sense that a stick of butter is a "soft structural material"

It could use a few commas, but it's not terrible. "Sitting an exam" is standard Australian English, I presume. In Europe, it's commonly called "writing an exam" (they started moving from written answers to psychometry much more recently). Maybe "sitting an exam" doesn't make literal sense, but neither does "taking an exam" really; I mean, where are you taking it?

Do you deny that liberty tends to erode over time? Or did a hallucination cause you to falsely believe I wanted to get rid of all government?

br
If neither of those is true, then I cannot understand what motivated you to write that post. It looks like a knee-jerk response to someone else's conversation.

same as now, war with people shooting each other with guns. next question?

Nope, old school high powered rifle. First shot alone would have killed him, going in his upper back, then penetrating neck, damaging vertebra in spine, through top of his right lung, and exiting his throat beneath his larynx. Then second shot made large cavity in rear of his head and send skull and brains flying.

you make assertion based on one person, not you, who was away for six years.....

Here's reality, in prior decades soldiers have indeed gone home with not only machine guns and service pistols, along with interesting war trophies.

no, no, no. you're still thinking of solving the technical problem of delivering signal. this is mostly old news. sure there are a few improvements here and there, but it's far more important to solve the new problem of extracting maximal profit through market segmentation.

according to a deterministic theory, or one where 300ms is a hard upper bound.

in other words, it's a dumbass assumption.