I doubt your math, but it doesn't really matter. For every megawatt of power generated by a coal plant, on average, 2,249 lbs carbon dioxide are generated. In 2013, there were 1,581,115 megawatt hours of electricity generated by coal. That's 3,555,927,635 pounds.
Even so, you're saying, he's a hypocrite, right? Wrong.
The President isn't saying "Shut down everything that emits carbon dioxide". He's saying that it's time to decrease our carbon dioxide emissions. No hypocrisy, and even with your numbers, a drop in the bucket for emissions.
But how again is that not hypocrisy? "We need to emit less carbon", then flies everywhere in a fuel guzzling modified 747, even for quick vacations.
And when "deniers" say small steps wouldn't be enough to combat AGW anyway, they get lambasted for being too fatalistic, because every little bit helps.. but now this is a just a "drop in the bucket". Maybe those who wish to lead should do so by example, especially those who call for dramatic reductions. I know he can't go everywhere without AF1, but he and Hillary don't do a damn thing to check their carbon footprint.
The problem is that too much shitware was changing the browser defaults out from under users. You'd install some piece of crapware and they'd hide a checkbox telling you it was bundled with Chrome or Mozilla or whatever and you'd end up with a new browser you didn't want.
So to stop that, now only the user can change the default browser. Mozilla shouldn't be blaming Microsoft for improving the user experience, they should be blaming the assholes they allowed to bundle Mozilla for money.
While that in itself may be commendable (I've fixed hijacked computers before, it's a pain) that still doesn't excuse MS for changing the already set preferences of the user during the upgrade. It should very simple for the upgrade to leave that registry key essentially untouched, or export/import it as needed.
You piss your money away on interest to the bank on your mortgage. City tax. School tax. Water tax. Insurance.
Your landlord is just passing those costs on to you in your rent. Utilities, as well.
And I'm not proffering "financial" advice nor being "smug", just the common sense tenet that a solid house is generally a good investment, and something you can sell or pass on to your kids. The only renters I know rent only because they have to, they can't afford a down payment. They live hand to mouth, and it's sad because they're friends. Also, I'm talking about houses with property, not condos.
So, please, spare me your financial ignorance and robotic pride to be a non-thinking herd animal, parroting your easily-refuted points.
Thanks for the laugh and fulfilling the stereotype of an obnoxious french-canadian.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh