Comment Re:Wow (Score 3, Insightful) 70
How sad that you're so incurious.
How sad that you're so incurious.
Depending on where practical concerns require you to put the hub, and depending on what might block or interfere, even a modest house can be large enough to have areas outside the reach of zigbee without carefully placed repeater nodes.
Whenever I have to do anything with Google, I create a fresh junk gmail account and forget about it shortly thereafter.
If I have to remember gmail credentials to use something... I find another option that doesn't have that restriction.
That was a lot of ignorant crap spouted out there. Let's sort the shit into different piles and identify it:
1) Virtually all "smart home" devices are not "dependent" on the internet, this one included which will continue to function as a thermostat going forward.
Err... except that it IS dependent on both the Internet and the vendor to be anything more than a dumb thermostat, and those extra features are why it was purchased in the first place.
2) Without an external server manage a session for you your device instantly is not suitable for 99.9% of the population who don't have external routable IPs,
If you don't have a routable IP, you don't have an Internet connection.
3) or any idea how to configure port forwarding on a router,
There are services available to broker the connection between your home server and your mobile device through a secure tunnel. And they're pretty much 'click here' to get up and running. And yes, you pay for that, monthly. And if they shut down, because they're an add-on and not part of either server or client... you can find a replacement service to handle it.
It's really dumb to just make dumb posts on subjects where you clearly don't have a deep enough understanding to discuss them intelligently.
I can't recall why I chose zigbee over Z-Wave initially, it might have been price or ease of Home Assistant integration at the time.
My understanding is the Z-Wave has better range, so for some that might be an important factor.
If you want to build a 'smart home', never ever but anything that requires the vendor's server to operate. First, it's immediately dumb to have your local home automation dependent on the Internet. Second, it is dumb to have your local home automation dependent on the continuous support of a company not getting a monthly fee out of you.
No matter how attractive those devices seem, do not purchase them. Just don't.
A big indicator of potential issues is that the devices use WiFi.
That typically means they want routable IP connections and will need to call home to set up and call home to function. Get zigbee or Z-Wave devices and they'll work until they have a local hardware failure.
If you want to control things over the Internet, get Home Assistant set up and let it be your portal. The software is free.
Of course there is a technological solution... Battery shells that are too big for a human mouth.
That TV remote's going to get unwieldy, though.
add a toggle to disable VoLTE calls
With 3G being phased out, you'd be stuck on WiFi calling if you did that, effectively defeating the purpose of having a cellular phone.
Pretty difficult to find a worse choice, I'd say.
Zynga. A name that makes everyone who knows what it means turn around and run the other way. An exploitative evil empire.
If after Unity got extensive flak for trying to push through a hostile pricing model someone asked what kind of person to choose as the next CEO to remove that stain from your reputation - I think "CEO of Zynga" came dead last by a wide margin and then some intern sorted the list the wrong way around.
My confidence that Unity is going to do the right thing just dropped from zero to absolute zero.
Why would you lie when that's so easily fact-checked, and do so without at least posting as AC while you're trolling?
Google's pay rate for a level 4 engineer in India is about 6.7m rupees which is roughly 80k USD. In California the same category averages around 280k USD.
Wow, you're an abrasive jackass, aren't you?
I've never had a problem with cheap bread lasting a week. Fresh made, no preservatives? Gone in a day or two.
Maybe you're just too fucking stupid to know the difference.
That's a whole other level of poverty, but if you can buy a loaf of bread and a jar of jam at a Walmart, you should be good for a week's worth of lunches without a fridge. And water's better for you. If you're too poor for that, you'd better have a farm plot and access to a clean stream or you're going to die. Then again, that's 'rural poor'. In a city you don't even have those options, so below a certain threshold it's beg or die.
When I was (relatively) poor, I spent a lot more on day-to-day stuff than I do now. I had no long term view because I couldn't imagine ever being able to save up enough to matter. Luckily, my family had sufficient money to carry me until I got it together and caught a break, but for an awful lot of people that isn't an option.
Outsourcing your American security to India. That tells you right there Google isn't even trying to hide that it doesn't really care about data security.
Presumably the business unit that is responsible for data mining and monetization will remain in the US under tight control.
It's easy to see it only one way, when it's both. I think it's about hope.
If someone never has enough to succeed, they stop seeing the utility in frugality. Why save when you can't even make it to the next pay? Then it snowballs - why bother brown-bagging it, just go to McD's and save the hassle. You're broke anyway, right?
The amount of sacrifice required for someone without money or education to catch up with someone who has them is more than any of us with money would likely be willing to make... but few people who have never had to worry about putting food on the table or finding a place to sleep can imagine that. It's just obviously so easy, the poor should just do it!
Unified, centralized security has utility. LDAPS isn't quite at the same level as AD yet.
You must realize that the computer has it in for you. The irrefutable proof of this is that the computer always does what you tell it to do.