Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:This is very surprising... (Score 3, Insightful) 181

The whole thing is about perception, it wont really stop people who planned to shop-lift but the number of spur of the moment shop-lifters will drop like a rock because of the perceived risk of getting caught will be much higher. It's a cheap solution with a measurable positive economical effect for the store.

Comment Re:The difference (Score 1) 37

i'm not really impressed.

Of course, because it's obvious you don't understand that what you want isn't the same what everyone else wants.

why do you type shit? don't do that!

Defensive much?

i stand corrected, i didn't know they have a business option. well, i hope it is considerably more nuanced than "à la carte click-click"

You would have known that if you actually bothered to find things out, but you went full "not invented here" and started assuming stupid things to invent strawmen why it must horrible.

no, that is your strawman. "verified every source" is not the same as "install random executable without even knowing what version it is form a source that isn't an official distribution". it seems your argument is that if you don't perform full audits everywhere you might aswell ignore security altogether and install whatever you're offered à la carte click-click. well, good for you, and good luck.

It wasn't my argument, it was yours since you specifically said "without my control or supervision", that implies you are on top of everything you install.

and, yes, i check sources often, depending on the situation and the level of trust. on a professional level that's just mandatory, or you have specialized people doing it for you. and no, i do not install random software from random sources, so i have no use for ninite. but by all means, knock yourself out ...

Funny then how inconsistent you are when doing your checking since it seems to be built on familiarity and visual cues rather than actually looking up facts.

i do not install random software from random sources, so i have no use for ninite. but by all means, knock yourself out ...

He said while using package managers that install random software from random sources.

Learn how the world and people work, because assuming everyone has the same needs and wants is just plain stupid and lazy. You imply you are big on due diligence but your responses here shows something entirely different, because making shit up and assuming things about something you didn't even bother to look into, that is a fucking professional disgrace.

Comment Re:The difference (Score 1) 37

windows has tools out of the box to do this. winget with some scripting, backup and restore or sysprep and there are a ton of opensource solutions like clonezilla, chocolatey or scoop where at least you know what exactly you are installing, not to mention alternatives like docker or professional/enterprise tools.

And I guess all these tools makes it so you can pick 5 apps from an a la carte menu and have them installed in minutes with a few clicks without resorting to typing and running shit in an administrator console? And who uses Clonezilla to install software on Windows? Docker I can get, but Clonezilla...

Btw, in regards to professional tools - why do you think Ninite isn't one? It's not like they have a version specifically geared towards businesses.. Oh, wait! They do!

that you know of. and ofc you know there will never be.

Just like you wouldn't know of any problems with any of the applications you use, right?

it had nothing to do with the website, everything to do with the proposition of someone offering to install some collection of software from undisclosed sources without my control or supervision.

When was the last time you verified every source you got your software from? Because that is the basis for your argument here, and I hope that you actually do that because otherwise you are just being a hypocrite for the simple reason of not being familiar with a piece of software that hundred of thousands of people use.

it's something so unnecessary and trivial that it is immediately suspicious, even gross: this is like someone offering you to carry your wallet across the street to save you the burden. ok, it might be not a bad person, just helplessly naive. take your chances if you want, i'll carry that "burden".

So Ninite as a package-manager is now suspicious and totally unnecessary and trivial? But Chocolatey who do exactly the same thing isn't? And Scoop? The very first thing it says you should do is to open a powershell and change the execution policy so you can download and run an unknown script to install it. Funny how that isn't suspicious at all for you.

Your reaction is typical of people who instead of actually looking shit up starts throwing it on the wall for no other reason than being unfamiliar with something.

Comment Re:The difference (Score 1) 37

if you need bulk installs and images there are many sane options to do that.

Which I guess comes from random third parties that provide tools that installs software using admin privileges.

Ninite has been around 16-17 years now and if you haven't heard of it it's because of two things: 1. There has never been any issues with it security-wise, 2. No one expect you to know about every tool available.

And I have to ask, what was it about their website that made you dismiss the tool? Was it the absence of ads and fake download links, or its simple and clean design presenting everything you need at a glance?

Comment Re:and the real loser is... (Score 3, Insightful) 55

How do the pirates win? How can any of this affect non-customers?

You are missing the point, this affects current customers which will lead to some of them becoming "non-customers" which is a win for them since they will have less problems and ads, plus they'll have more disposable income they can spend to their liking on something else.

I know you think you're being insightful and clever, but you are neither.

It's insightful and clever when compared to the actions of the companies involved which seems hellbent on accelerating the enshittification.

Comment Re:Say what? (Score 5, Informative) 44

That 117% is based on this definition: The power conversion percentage indicated by the asterisk is derived from the optimal power (or power density) obtained from motor-driven devices in air, as reported in the corresponding literature, compared to the optimal power achieved under simulated aquatic conditions in the laboratory.

Ie. 100% is a baseline corresponding to a specific known metric and technology, so 117% isn't how much energy is actually extracted and converted but how it performs against the baseline. So don't worry, the technology doesn't break the laws of physics, just the laws of sensibilities due to poor presentation of the scientific paper.

Comment Re:Ah like MS-DOS JOIN and SUBST eh! (Score 1) 54

That brings me back, we discovered that you could send a malformed IPX/SPX packet to any computer on the network and it would instantly reboot when the network stack crashed. And so DIE.EXE was born and was used on unsuspecting targets during the weekly and very unofficial beer and snipes tournament at the office.

Slashdot Top Deals

Time-sharing is the junk-mail part of the computer business. -- H.R.J. Grosch (attributed)

Working...