Not in the least, and here is a recent example: Flock Safety and Texas Sheriff Claimed License Plate Search Was for a Missing Person. It Was an Abortion Investigation

Everything is cheap when you are playing with other people's money.

I should also mention that moving something the size of a space-shuttle is difficult and very expensive especially since none of the specialized transports (SCA 747-100) for is in a functional state.

I wonder how many people have lost money betting after using ChatGPT to recommend what to bet on. Using it to pick stocks are in the same category of stupid.

That 117% is based on this definition: The power conversion percentage indicated by the asterisk is derived from the optimal power (or power density) obtained from motor-driven devices in air, as reported in the corresponding literature, compared to the optimal power achieved under simulated aquatic conditions in the laboratory.

Ie. 100% is a baseline corresponding to a specific known metric and technology, so 117% isn't how much energy is actually extracted and converted but how it performs against the baseline. So don't worry, the technology doesn't break the laws of physics, just the laws of sensibilities due to poor presentation of the scientific paper.

Uhm, there are doorknobs with microprocessors and NFC these days that validates that a physical key is allowed to turn the lock so Winston's prediction isn't that far off to be entirely realized.

That brings me back, we discovered that you could send a malformed IPX/SPX packet to any computer on the network and it would instantly reboot when the network stack crashed. And so DIE.EXE was born and was used on unsuspecting targets during the weekly and very unofficial beer and snipes tournament at the office.

Almost full circle, perhaps just one more step until you get it.

The switches were tripped just after 08:08:42 and AFAIK copy-pasting 42 or 43 don't turn it into 01.

Of course they did, but that doesn't explain why anyone would write 1 as 01.

I can't see any reason why someone would write 01 sec instead of 1 sec but I can see someone writing 01 sec by mistakenly pressing AltGr/Ctrl instead of "."

We'll have to wait for a more comprehensive report that don't have that ambiguous time to make sense of that time gap.

The interesting thing here is the timing, 0.1 seconds. Two switches that need be pulled out and then moved to the CUTOFF position can't be changed within 0.1 seconds unless someone uses both hands and a synchronicity of 0.1 seconds seems very tight but possible if timed right. For a pilot to be able to do this they must turn and bend over in their seat while strapped in to be able to reach the switches with both hands. This means that it was intentional or the switches were faulty in some way and switched themselves to the CUTOFF-position. The latter can for example be due to that they were never seated correctly in the RUN-position.

So we went from the false argument "its free advertising" to "should we protect incompetence".

You sure are competent in mental gymnastics at least.

Why did you go to the trouble of inventing a strawmen argument?

And that'll teach me to proofread, it should read Your definition of free is very strange.

It wasn't free marketing, either the company suffer reputational damage for not supporting something a stupid AI said they could which will cost them money in lost customers or they develop a new future which will cost them money. Your definition of definition is very strange.