The link to the original article can be removed. But that does not mean that Google has to remove links to new articles that summarize the data in the original article. Each new link would have to be looked at separately by the courts.

Perhaps he should have just changed his name. Then any search done on his name would not be linked to the public newspaper reports of things that happened under his old name. Unless the government posts all name changes online somewhere also, then that would be indexed and would be discover-able.

Unless the European people would prefer to use a search engine that actually has some relevant results to give out. Then they will prefer to use the US search engine rather than the limited and useless European search engine. And spending time and effort to prune much of your database out and ensure it does not get re-indexed does not sound like something that would put a company in a "better position" as you put it. To me that sounds like a large cost and since your results are incomplete you are actually at a competitive disadvantage also.

Here is a Ted Talk on how you are probably tying your shoelaces wrong. Did you know there are two versions of that knot. One is the strong version and the other is the weak version. Most people learn to tie the weak version. The weak version also causes the bows to align along the long axis of the shoe instead of lying across the shoe as it should.

Of course, 8-8 would be close enough to 9-0 to work and be quicker to enter also.

Sharks and whales are interesting in that they look similar, but are quite different. One breaths air while the other has gills to breath water. Also, the whales have a horizontal tail-fin and their propulsion motion is an up and down wave while the sharks are based on a fish body plan with a vertical tail-fin and their propulsion motion is a side to side wave.

There is a tv special made based on that book called Alien Planet. I had not heard of the book before you mentioned it, but I recognized the name of the planet and the strange types of creatures on it. It was interesting even though it is all made-up speculation and there is no real science in it. It is on Netflix if any one wants to check it out. I particularly liked the ideas on how the remote AI flying rovers would be designed and programmed each with a slightly different personality so they won't all befall the same mishap.

If that truly is a new quote for you, then you need to read "The Hichhiker's Guide to the Universe". You will be shitting yourself all the way through.

The odds of something with a million to one odds happening is actually pretty high when you consider there are 7 billion people on this planet.

That's all fine and dandy that you will probably never need to defend yourself. In the vary rare case that someone breaks into my home with intent to harm me or my family, I don't want to be reliant on the criminal waiting for the police to show up after letting me use the phone. It come down to taking care of yourself and being prepared. People don't learn martial arts because they are getting the shit kicked out of them every day, it's good exercise and it is a useful skill to have if you ever need it. Same thing with having a gun. When seconds matter, the police are only minutes away.

Paint Ball store. Some people use it for cold weather as it does not freeze up.

The most crazy thing about Lucas making such drastic changes to his movies is that he agrees with you that it shouldn't be done. He has been a big proponent of keeping black and white films in their original. george lucas on colorization He argues that everybody else should keep the movies as they were originally made, but when it comes to his own movies that does not apply.

I would tend to agree with you but there is one point I'd like to make. When the number of "Bizarre conspiracies by shadowy forces" that have been confirmed true by leaks starts to go up into higher numbers it makes you rethink anything about the official story as being possibly true.

If the car tries to avoid both cars for as long as possible, it will hit both of them at the same time. That would presumably spread the impact over an even larger area than hitting only one car would have so would give the best results.

I don't see how a car could know how many people would be killed in an accident. If the other cars have airbags the occupants may only get bruises or some broken bones. Some of these what-ifs are going to far with what a car could reasonably "know".