http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/wave"a disturbance on the surface of a liquid body, as the sea or a lake, in the form of a moving ridge or swell."

If you are using another definition of the word wave (such as that used by physics to refer to light, sound, etc.) when talking about water, you really should specify what you mean.

If the President tried to set up something like that, Congress would refuse to fund it, Russia would Veto it, and the French would be against it just because the US was for it.

But even assuming it was possible for the UN to run a conspiracy, his own statements contradict him. Errors do not equal "Conspiracies", they equal incompetence. Conspiracies would involve intentionally falsified data - such as his personal statement that the UN is running a conspiracy.

The honest trust is, that even if it was stopped being used like a username, it is still very easy to find out. The first 5 numbers are assigned based on birth date and location. 90% of the time you can predict it from stuff found on Facebook. The last four are supposed to be random. Which means from a set of just 10,000 facebook pages, I should easily be able to randomly guess multiple people's social security number.

Specifically, we need the right to - at our option, not the government - go into the social security office and say "my identity was stolen, take my picture, DNA and finger prints, give me a picture ID social security card".

Once you have a VSS#, no one is allowed to open an account under that VSS# unless they do so in person, so the account opener can see the photo and/or finger prints match what the SSA have on file.

Obviously, this must be at the citizen's option, not the governments.

Such a system would put a hard wall up protecting victims of identity theft from further exploitation.

Of course if you are a black man, getting picked up immediately, rather than watching 20 cabs ignore you may make you willing to spend more for Uber.

The solution is simple:

Pass the following laws: 1) Prosecutors can not prosecute or even investigate accusations of legal crimes by police that they may in the future have to work with. Instead, each state should set up an "Internal Affairs Office of Prosecution", whose sole job is to prosecute police and similar law enforcement officers. They will be judged on how many convictions they get, and only the best will be allowed to become managers.

2) After rule #1 has been in place for at least 5 years, require every one appointed to be a Judge to have previously successfully prosecuted at least one police officer.

This system attempts to counter the natural prejudice prosecutors and judges have in favor of the police while at the same time creates a strong motivation within the government to prosecute their own.

1) Not only should he be fired - if only to save money on investigations, but ....

2) the idiots that did not fire him after the 10th investigation should also be fired for incompetence.

P.S. I am of course assuming that all 18 complaints weren't from a single incident or from a single person, or members of a single drug gang. But that should not be that hard to detect.

This means the Sting ray should still illegal.

But I am majorly disappointed in the wording of the ruling. Knowledge of technology should have NO bearing on expectation of privacy. My knowledge of what people can do does not make it legal for them to do it.

Iceland, Greenland, Finland, Russia, and Canada all have MAJOR benefits from higher temperatures, while many smaller island countries will quite literally die at higher temperatures.

There are oil rights, trade routes,and flooding issues that mankind has a long history of straight out old school war over.

Also, it's not between husband and wives that like each other, but between people that don't get along well already.

Try this analogy - you and your neighbor arguing about whether the oil rig he installed is 20 ft over the property line and dripping oil into your bedroom.

Writing is an art form, not a science. If a computer could grade the art of writing, then the computer could DO THE WRITING - or at least 'fix' the problems it detected. In which case it would become the equivalent of teaching humans to use a slide rule.

I am absolutely sure that our best and brightest writers will end up being screwed over by AI programs grading them