Comment Re:Tolls? (Score 1) 837
But certainly not on a regular road ridden by something other than 5 elephants.
But certainly not on a regular road ridden by something other than 5 elephants.
Should be 'Academics hypothesize better tor client', since all they're giving out is their analysis and not sourcecode there's no way to verify their claims.
Yet we DID have a patient zero not long ago and the spread was very limited and died out quickly in spite of your claim that there is no herd immunity at our current level of vaccination.
Whether you calculate using ESAL or load spectra, the damage factor is still at least hundreds of times what a passenger car will do under any circumstance.
Peterbilt & Kenworth tractors, without trailers, weigh 18,000 - 21,000 lbs
And in addition to trucks, there are also buses which tend to have fewer axles & wheels. Those can be much worse that your average tractor-trailer.
Not necessarily, but you would need more than a 15 minute procedure. In some cases they can divide a muscle and graft different nerves to different parts to get a myoelectric output for muscles that are gone.
OTOH, using "roll your own crypto" is nortorious for individualized holes and weaknesses. It does tend to mean that the "one size fits all" means of breaking the code won't work, however. Or at least may well not work.
That said, if you have good enough communication to share custom crypto programs, you may be better off using a one-time pad....as that can't even theoretically be broken. But it does require a good source of random numbers (e.g. amplified triode vacum tube with no input so you're just amplifying noise). Such things are reasonably easy to build, but for some reason they aren't normal computer accessories. (Video cams watching a flickering flame are another good source.)
But custom crypto is hard to do correctly. AND it requires good communications to standardize the programs. So if you have the communication, a one time pad is better.
No, the damage is controlled by axle weight. Surely you don't claim that a unicycle causes more damage than a fully loaded dump truck?
Go to any torrent search site and the ads there (other thjan the porn ads) are all for VPNs so people can't see you download. I'm sure they could figure that out.
Outsouring over time starts to create its own bureaucracy bloat. It’s the modern corporate version of one of the observations of C. Northcote Parkinson: “Officials make work for each other.” As Clive describes, the first response to the problems resulting from outsourcing is to try to bury them, since outsourcing is a corporate religion and thus cannot be reversed even when the evidence comes in against it. And then when those costs start becoming more visible, the response is to try to manage them, which means more work (more managerial cost!) and/or hiring more outside specialists (another transfer to highly-paid individuals).
ATA over Ethernet for one. If it's running over a private network also used for management the second question is also yes.
He said they weren't real jobs. I guess that means they don't need doing.
Sure minimum wage jobs are not desirable. Do you REALLY think the people trying and failing to make ends meet on one PLANNED to be in a minimum wage job? Do you REALLY believe that was their aspiration in high school?
Fact is, the economy tanked and decent paying skilled manufacturing jobs got sent overseas. Sometimes all that's left are minimum wage or welfare. And then people here have the nerve to call them lazy after they choose minimum wage over welfare. Those people really should be ashamed of themselves.
I do sympathize, but that is between him and the publisher. Of course, that only applies to new issues. He can do what he wants (within reason) with old issues and with other related merchandise.
But my point is that everyone complains when the price goes up but that doesn't mean it wasn't necessary and it doesn't make it go back down. I asked for an example of a business 'going broke' in Seattle and all I've got is one that's complaining.
That's pretty much the story of the cheap labor conservative in a nutshell.
If they really want to make road taxes usage based, then they need to charge by the ton-mile or something like that. Wear and tear on roads goes by the weight of the vehicle, and if I remember correctly it is a non-linear relationship (square or cube, I can't remember).
It's pretty trivial for a vehicle to compute its own weight, so it is similarly trivial for a vehicle to compute its own road tax as well. Many cars are now coming equipped with GSM modems as well, so your car could simply upload your road impact once/month and you can be billed for your use tax.
Piece of cake.
Never trust a computer you can't repair yourself.
