Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?

Comment This is why you save. (Score 0) 211

Listen up, kiddos. This is why you save your money from day 1 after you graduate. Forget the new beemer, swank apartment, and $50 bottles of vodka. From the day you graduate you should be stuffing as much as your income as you can into a tax-advantaged plan, and an equal amount to liquid investments (including a Roth).

You lived like a poor college student until you graduated, and so there's nothing wrong with living like a slightly less poor college student. That way, when something like this happens, you can be the hero who says "fuck you, you can keep your severance," and then head right over to the local TV station to spill all of the beans.

Freedom isn't free. When you take your $70K/year out of college and blow it on a nice car, a party lifestyle, and expensive booze, you should not be surprised to find yourselves in shackles eventually.

Comment It is still a net energy loser (Score 1) 142

Because, you know, thermodynamics.

Methanol has more chemical potential energy than CO2, and that energy must come from somewhere. This is the same unicorn fantasy that the "water as fuel" people constantly buy into.

Sure, you can sequester CO2 from the atmosphere and turn it into combustible fuel, but you're going to spend a lot of energy to do it when there is a perfectly natural process for doing so, called "planting trees."

Comment Regulating Games was Never About Violence (Score 1) 235

The massive push to regulate games was never about preventing violence. In fact, the big push to regulate anything is never about what they say it's about.

It is always about one thing and one thing only: money. The gaming industry is enormous, and largely unregulated. Politicians see a cash cow here but need a way to convince voters to give them the authority to regulate and tax it to death. Currently the federal government has very little authority, even under the Commerce Clause, to regulate or tax video games.

Politicians on both sides of the two-party aisle would love to get their grubby little paws into the gaming cookie jar. The leftists would love to say how they're protecting children while the whackjobs on the right want to protect our morals. Of course, that'll cost money - a lot of money - which they will spend on making policy friendly to their sponsors.

I imagine game companies everywhere would be busting down the doors on Capitol Hill the morning after game regulation authority was passed to make sure they set up large campaign contributions to the right politicians.

Comment Re:Economies are AC-coupled (Score 1) 412

You're right. AC coupled circuits actually don't arrive at a new quiescent point after a DC bias is applied to the input (which was actually the point, even though the words didn't add up). Too early in the AM, I guess, but thanks for calling that out so I could correct it.

Busch league mental error, for sure.

There is no need for the ad hominem, though.

Comment Re:LIES (Score 2) 279

It's hard to try to do something that IS protected by the constitution:

Buy a gun
Film the police
Record a government meeting
Speak out against your government
Get a fair trial
Receive a punishment that fits the crime

The list goes on. And on. And on.

So, given that it is so difficult to do things that ARE protected by the Constitution, it really should come as no surprise that it would be difficult in the extreme to do things that aren't specifically protected.

After all, the government has slowly changed the tack to "it is the Constitution that grants rights, and the only rights you have are those enumerated in it," even though this is as false as it is farcical. My kid's social studies book even has a chapter section on how the Constitution grants rights. It'd be funny were it not so scary.

Comment Re:You gotta love this industry (Score 2) 249

It's not Netflix, really. It's the production houses. Netflix licenses content from publishers, and the publishers impose restrictions upon where that content can be shown. Often this is because the publisher already has an exclusive arrangement with a streaming service somewhere, and cannot allow another streaming service to carry it.

It's similar to local blackouts in sports. The sports league sells the TV rights to a media company with the restriction that the content cannot be shown in the markets local to the stadium, because the league wants warm bodies in the stadium, not at home watching on TV. That's not the fault of the media company.

Comment Mine is actually the toughest (Score 5, Interesting) 227

I have a very rigorous hiring process. First of all, you cannot apply. I don't post job openings anywhere. There is no official mechanism to approach me for a job.

When I decide I need to hire someone, I seek out applicants on my own, based on reputation in industry, published works, patents, and other factors. When I identify someone I want to hire, I send my talent team to make contact in person (i.e. stalk them haha), often literally with a tap on the shoulder.

The process works. In 15 years, I've never had anyone leave (except to retire), and I've never had to let anyone go.

Slashdot Top Deals

10.0 times 0.1 is hardly ever 1.0.