Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Nonsense (Score 1) 328

So by your standard

By his standard, they can't compel you to give your fingerprint *for this purpose*. It's about compelling you to divulge information. If they already have your fingerprint *not solely for this purpose*, they have no need to compel you to unlock your phone with your own fingers. If they don't have the right tools to do it, too fucking bad for them.

I have no interest in making it easy for government thugs to force people to incriminate themselves, unlike you and your straw men.

If you want to argue that the courts are given too much power to compel disclosure you can make that argument.

But to me this ruling seems perfectly in line with existing standards.

Comment Re:Nonsense (Score 1) 328

Giving a fingerprint for the purpose is basically the same as giving a passcode, since either way they get access all sorts of information on your phone, which you're forced to help them retrieve. Unsurprising that a judge would try to find 'clever' ways around the spirit of the constitution and put little thought into their decision.

In reality, they shouldn't be able to force you to do any such thing. No passcodes, and no fingerprints for the purposes of granting them access to your information.

So by your standard they're not able to hack your computer, or access your email account, or search your house, because all of those things reveal tons of information about you.

Nor can they have you give fingerprints, stand in a line up, or respond to a supeona since they're forcing you to do something.

This was the right decision and completely in line with the US constitution. This wasn't a warrantless search done during a traffic stop. This was a request made by the prosecutor during a trial, the defendent doesn't have to speak, they just have to press their information to a pad to unlock information the court has requested.

Comment Re:Why use these hybrid rocket engines (Score 0) 445

Don't conventional liquid engines give significantly more thrust per weight of propellent.

If that were true, then the Space Shuttle would have used them instead of solid rocket boosters.

From everything I've read, these hybrid designs are also far less controllable and have all sorts of odd dynamics as the solid propellent burns away.

They have advantages and disadvantages.

Comment Elephants. Rooms. (Score 1) 80

I think the big elephant in the room is more to be found further upstream, in the area of manufacturing. Worrying about software hacks is one thing - not having the faintest absolute clue exactly *what* is inside the chip package is something else entirely. Think its an accumulator bank? Oh sorry, maybe we forgot to mention the harmonic bundles associated with wave guidance within the interstitial distances of the rapidly blinking transistors .. yeah, those can be read from space. With a satellite (or 12).

The game is over folks, or rather .. the game is on, depending on how you look at it. Until you are capable of investigating and participating, directly, in the sub-assemblies, you will always have a weak back door. Either we, ultimately, become able to assemble our own chips on the desktop, or there will always be a power class: those who can build such devices, and those who can only be ruled by them.

Comment Re:Out-of-the-box babysitting of processes (Score 1) 928

Maybe I'm unique in this regard, but as an admin, if something goes down on one of my servers, I want it to stay down until I intervene.

I'd want to have the option, but for the default behavior to be that it stays down. I feel like unfortunately, unless you've lived a charmed life where you only have to work with software that's high quality, you will probably run across some server running some piece of crap software that can be a bit crashy. Yes, I've run across software like that on Linux servers too. And personally, ideally, I like to have the easy ability to control what happens when something crashes. Should the server ignore the whole thing and keep chugging along? Should it attempt a restart? Should it wait 10 minutes, and then attempt a restart? If the attempted restart fails, should it make a second attempt? At what point should it notify me?

I like when I can have control over that kind of thing, if possible, and I'd like to have that control be easy and reliable.

Comment Re:Reliable servers don't just crash (Score 1) 928

Well no, he's right. It's just a tautology-- reliable servers don't crash. It's kind of like, "No daughter of mine is going to get pregnant out of wedlock!" I can say that as long as I'm willing to disown any that get pregnant out of wedlock. If she gets pregnant, then she's no longer my daughter.

So reliable servers don't just crash, but unfortunately a large percentage of the servers out there that, for one reason or another, aren't 100% reliable. I sure wish I had software that would work well on those.

Comment Re:how many small businesses has Obama killed? (Score 1) 739

Are republicans so stupid that they can not see it's a Republican system?

Their memories are simply that short. That's how they forget that none of their interests have been served by their elected politicians, and proceed to re-elect them.

Here in California, however, we re-relected Jerry Brown. That's very like re-electing Marion Berry. Heh heh heh.

Slashdot Top Deals

A boss with no humor is like a job that's no fun.

Working...