No precisely because they didn't require people to use the right hardware so they had a bad experience. Windows 8 is really good on hardware designed for Windows 8. Had they not allowed Windows 7 hardware to run Windows 8, not treating it like an upgrade for existing systems there wouldn't have been this backlash.
Same mistake they made with Vista.
You mean not allowing Windows 8 on non-touch laptops?
Aside from that, not the case. I bought a Dell Inspiron (albeit non-touch) a few months ago from Costco, preloaded w/ Windows 8. The configuration? A Core i7, 8GB of RAM, 1TB HDD. Issue was not the performance, which was fine. Issue was that the whole experience of working w/ Windows was totally overhauled. I installed Classic Shell, which initially seemed to fix it somewhat, but I found out that when I'd type a document and the cursor got anywhere near the right end of the screen, the charms bar would pop up. Oh, and also, the trackpad was too sensitive, and there wasn't a good way of disabling it.
After a week of trying all this, I bit the bullet and installed PC-BSD on the laptop, wiping out Windows 8. It had some rough edges @ first, and it took me a few tries to get it right (such as automatically booting to the OS, getting the BIOS settings right), but soon enough, I had it working the way I wanted. Recent updates to the OS, such as Lumina, have improved the experience somewhat, and now, I'm generally happy. In the meantime, all the work laptops that I've had have been Windows 7 only
Once Windows 10 is out, I might just try that, not on this laptop though. I might try Windows 10 on a Surface Pro, if I think the budget justifies it. But the current configuration I got was for $800, whereas a similarly configured Surface Pro 3, if it existed, would be something like >$2k. The smoother form factor is certainly worth a bit more, but not >$1k more.
Only Windows 8 platform I've liked has been Windows Phone 8, now the 8.1 version. Only thing I'm missing on that is Vonage.