Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:How is this different from holding a Compass? (Score 1) 289

Why is this a different "sense" organ? Because it uses the sense of "touch"? Is a handheld compass also an "on-body" circuit?

Evolutionarily, we at least have the vestiges of a "sense" of magnetic bearing - our brains contain tiny magnetite crystals, similar to (though much smaller and fewer) those found in birds, which do function to give them a sense of absolute direction. So whether or not we can reactivate that sense, we at least (probably) have the underlying wiring necessary to use it.

As for the cross-modality of this... Judging by TFA and other similar experiements about which I've read, I would say that we can indeed awaken that sense by providing an alternate means of inputting the relevant data (in this case, via touch).

But to compare this to looking at a normal compass, the biggest difference, I would say, comes from it providing constant and passive feedback about the local magnetic environment. Looking at a compass will indeed tell you which way to call "North", but you don't "experience" it as anything but a name for the way the needle points. If instead, you always had an accurate sense of North, I would expect it to affect you much more strongly - Your proprioception would suddenly include an absolute orientation rather than merely relative positioning.

Comment Re:What qualifies for new sensory organ? (Score 2, Interesting) 289

>> Technically this is a computer-brain interface. The device is just using convenient, pre-existing inputs to the brain.

So, does that mean that reading a regular compass in the old-fashioned way, say, by using your eyes, qualifies as a computer-brain interface, since the device (the compass) is just using a convenient, pre-existing input mechanism to the brain (the eyes)?

>> So what the difference if this relies on someone's sense of touch?

The difference then is that the actual "sensoring" is done by the body's old hardware, so nothing new. Would you say then that a pager set on "vibrate" is a "new sensory organ" just because it communicates alerts via stimulation of touch sensors?

Kids nowadays, they are so easily amused.

        -dZ.

Comment Re:Ron Paul (Score 2, Insightful) 478

That would work... But we don't have a free market. Lets see here, oh you mean that we as the taxpayers have -paid- with our tax dollars to bail out various failing auto companies? I don't call that the free market. I call that wealth redistribution. Would you pay with your taxes for a new bridge and then accept not being able to drive across it for no reason? Taxpayers paid for these companies, it is not feasible with the current technology to hand out free cars because the raw materials cost money. However, source code and repair documentation costs nothing. It is the very least they could do after we were forced to give up our hard earned money to support an industry without the financial sense to balance its finances.

Comment Re:Science =! Public Policy (Score 1) 899

I'm don't want this discussion. After all, there's nothing that can convince you.

Let's just say that I agree with the point that there are exactly 2 ways to run an economy :
1) rationing : politicians decide, by direct military force, what happens in society
2) capitalism : people who work AND create value decide what happens in society

Those are the only 2 ways to get things done, as has been illustrated so many times in history. Socialism, even moderate amounts, really means the replacement of money by direct (and therefore constant) military force.

And the ugly part of socialism, in all it's forms, is that even with the massive violence necessary to keep such a society from immediatly falling apart, it doesn't work.

Real-life socialism comes down to beating, killing and stealing, resulting in poverty and misery for both the killers (socialists who joined the party at the correct time) and everyone else.

Comment Re:Ummmm (Score 1) 792

In theory the GPS could be more fair in pricing. IE of my 20 mile commute 7 miles are on privately owned and maintained roads(30%), and another 5-10% is out of state. If we ignore all other issues with GPS, states should jump the gas taxes higher, and give tax rebates to everyone with a GPS gathering data for them (maybe a $1000+ yearly registration fee for alternative fuel vehicles, again with a "rebate" for GPS tracking data.) So only out of state electric cars get a free ride (at least until it's nationwide shared toll.) throw in some in road weight sensors, to slap those heavy/overloaded vehicles with a premium... Use the public GIS data to figure out the actual public use... Heck even figure out different rates, ie gravel roads cost $X, bridges cost $Y, paved $Z. Then they can get people to car pool/bus... through the $10/mile sections.

Comment Re:He's complaining about... (Score 1) 164

Let me correct you. "For all YOU know". Others here know better.

Actually the development process of Delicious Library has been blogged about and formed the topic of a number of conference presentations. It is a ground breaking app.

The wood texture was commissioned from an artist, and took a number of iterations back to the artist to redo before it looked right for the app. That's the reason why people keep stealing Delicious Library's artwork to use in competitor programs (this isn't the first time). Any old wood texture simply won't do.

Why is there so much ignorance of design on Slashdot?

Comment So what happens (Score 1) 190

If there are no gravitational waves to be found? If we search the entire spectrum, and we don't find any, then I assume that falsifies the grav-wave theory (and the entire Honorverse). At that point, what is the next step/theory? In a related note, does gravity pull, or push? I think I remember reading somewhere that Einstein said gravity pushed, rather than pulled.

Comment Re:Just check the milliage (Score 1) 792

Why? Cars already have to go in for inspection, just check the mileage then and tax appropriately.

Not all states have vehicle inspections. As an example, Kansas, where I live. None of my vehicles have even been seen by the state, I just tell them the VIN of what I have, they tell me to pay $X in taxes, then give me a license plate.

Of course, implementing mandatory mileage checks at renewal time and computing taxes based on miles at that time would still be a helluva lot more sensible.

Comment Re:Fraud-bait... tort-bait (Score 1) 419

The alternative is to let Medicare bureaucrats, who are not doctors...

I'm sure many Insurance Company bureaucrats in places to decide your care are also not doctors. One difference, however, may be that Medicare bureaucrats have no profit motive.

I'm not trying to start an argument, it's something to consider.

I say this as a health care provider and a citizen: I'd take a government bureaucrat over an insurance corporation bureaucrat any day. One doesn't give a shit one way or the other if you get what you want, the other has a vested interest in keeping you from getting what you want.

Comment Re:That Analogy Falls Apart (Score 1) 917

Hear, hear. It's entirely possible that it'd be cheaper and more technologically feasible to send a two-way expedition than to send the amount of people and equipment needed to found a viable colony. It's quite a bit greater challenge of engineering to colonize a planet with an unbreathable atmosphere than to colonize a new continent.

The intriguing thing about this is that if I'm wrong and it's cheaper to establish a long-term colony, it would most likely be populated by people with above average IQ's. Unless the terrestrial laws of genetics don't apply on Mars for some hinky reason, we could end up with a race of ubermensch whose only weakness is inability to function in terrestrial gravity in a few generations. It would be seriously bad if they got bitter about the original world being left to a bunch of idiots, and decided to do something about it. Que "I for one" jokes.

Comment Re:The status quo (Score 1) 426

I don't know why you keep focusing on Sweden. It's just ONE of 30 member states inside the European Union. The rest of them are rather slow compared to the American states:

- Netherlands (slower than Delaware and Washington States)
- Germany (slower than Rhode Island,New Jersey,Massachusetts,Virginia,New York,Colorado,Connecticut,Arizona)
- and so on.

If you live in one of these states, the odds are you'll have faster connections than your Dutch or German or Italian or French cousins. And then you mention New York City. I couldn't find any information about NYC's average speed, but I did find several surrounding suburbs with excellent connection:

New York City's top ISPs:
WBS 51 Megabit/s
ANS 43 Mbit/s
RCN 36 Mbit/s

New York State's fastest cities:
Greenvale 22 Mbit/s
Westhampton 21
Lynnbrook 17
Sayville 17
Carmel, Bellporte, Woodmere, Bethpage, Sound Beach, Wellsville 16

Slashdot Top Deals

Don't compare floating point numbers solely for equality.

Working...