Comment Re:Freedom of Speech? (Score 1) 328
There are so many shades of gray here, there isn't enough time before the heat death of the universe to explain them all. Images of actual rape and actual murder actually as they're actually happening actually are illegal. The one exception, at least for rape (who's gonna charge the guy who was just unwittingly starred in a snuff file, anyway), is for the victim; he or she can and should do everything possible to record the act in order to use it as evidence after the fact.
Once you start talking about stealing, it can break down two ways; robbery, or burglary. Let's talk about robbery, because it involves physical interaction between the perpetrator and the victim; now you're filming an assault. That's also illegal.
Of course, with the recording of these acts, the law actually considers intent. That's why you don't get nailed for security camera footage, or for recording an event for evidence or to report it in the news.
There's a bit more nuance to it than I've described in this post, but I'm sure you can start developing the rest on your own.
Once you start talking about stealing, it can break down two ways; robbery, or burglary. Let's talk about robbery, because it involves physical interaction between the perpetrator and the victim; now you're filming an assault. That's also illegal.
Of course, with the recording of these acts, the law actually considers intent. That's why you don't get nailed for security camera footage, or for recording an event for evidence or to report it in the news.
There's a bit more nuance to it than I've described in this post, but I'm sure you can start developing the rest on your own.