Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Another miss (Score 1) 103

PS. PS. Also, you left out Samsung bada OS. Yes, it's unreleased as of yet - but launching in two months, and with the stated goal of shipping on "significant portion" of Samsung mobile phones; I guess they want to ship it on everything except from the most basic devices.

It will be big (I suspect quite quickly second only to Symbian) for one simple reason: Samsung is second only to Nokia in marketshare, and significantly ahead of the rest.

Comment Re:"legalize marijuana, solve tax issues" (Score 1) 147

The joke's on you though. Sometime before the end of his second term, there's going to be a huge fluff and it's going to come out that he was, in fact, a foreigner all this time. But we're going to have to make a retroactive amendment or everything he'll have signed by then will be nullified, causing huge economic distress as it unwinds more rapidly than a normal repeal.

Assuming he does get a second term. If he doesn't get a second term, then he'll have been an american this whole time and there's no issue.

Comment The sad thing about tyranny (Score 1, Insightful) 677

The sad thing about tyranny is that it's never necessary to submit to the tyrant. It's a voluntary thing often done in little steps for pragmatic reasons.

But this is the Internet and Anonymous does not have to submit to the tyranny of censorship. They don't have to be pragmatic. They don't have to (and can't!) negotiate. They are everywhere and nowhere. Some among them control vast swaths of the network in official and unofficial capacities. They have sympathizers and informants everywhere. They can accidentaly retire your domain, your IP space, your SSL certificate, without fear of consequence.

The corporation and its property employed in censorship is an instrument of tyranny and "in play". Its personnel are uniformed combatants engaged in pressing the fight and the higher in the tree they are the greater their responsibility. Censorship is tyranny and Anonymous is willing to take arms against it - it's that simple. They're not going to hurt anybody but they can wreck some business and they have wrecked some equipment. They've been known to uncover skeletons in the closets of their opposition and they can be quite resourceful in that regard. They are not the mainstream press, which casts its gaze the other way to get continued access to the play.

Anonymous doesn't have to filter their content to play. They're the pimp that supplied the hookers, the pusher that sold the coke to your aide (hell, Anonymous probably is your aide), the concierge that arranged for the gerbil, the maid that cleaned the room. They were the camera men and edit team for your reminiscence porn. They're the crew of the boat, the doctor that prescribed the cocktail, the bartender, the barmaid, all three hookers including the trangender dwarf. They're your accountant, your divorce lawyer, your shrink, your family counselor and your confessor. They sold you the condoms and ordinarily that's no business of theirs - but dick with them and your wife will find out with the rest of the world but the trail will never lead back to anyone in a traceable way unless it's good for a six-figure book deal.

Yes, it's an asymmetric engagement - that's how low intensity conflicts are fought these days. The corporations have their battalions of lawyers, their purchased senators and congressmen. They have their sheriffs and judges, their warrants and seizure laws. The array of legal means is the baton of oppression. Each individual anonymous, however, can rise perhaps only to the level of midemeanor in his civil disobedience and given their bulk bring down the mightiest corporation or its political tool.

Anonymous has their technology, their anonymity, their will, their access and their mass. This is a Cyber war. They've embraced Patton's admonition "The point is not to die for your country, the point is to make the other poor bastard die for his." The only way to be captured in a cyber war is to express incompetence, so they have no pity for the fallen. Their enemy is a lifeless, soulless corporation, so they have no pity for it either.

Yes, it's an asymmetric battle, and the outcome is certain. Your moral plea is nothing more than the tears of the wife of a vanquished Caesar: "It's not fair! The slaves don't know their place!" What you don't realize is that the proper place for a corporation that won't serve its customer is the dustbin of history.

"Looking back upon his handling of the incident, Roosevelt thought he 'never saw a bluff carried more resolutely through to the final limit.' And writing to a friend a few days later, he observed: 'I have always been fond of the West African proverb: "Speak softly and carry a big stick; you will go far." ' "

- Theodore Roosevelt

So it is that from time to time Anonymous must shake their stick at the world to prove they are still vital. It's not wise to volunteer to be the one they shake their stick at.

I don't even like the chans but I know better than to dick with them and so does every responsible member of the community. They serve the useful purpose of preserving the design goals of the Internet in their own way and when it suits them. I understand they do it for the lulz whatever that means. What I care about is that whoever tries to do away with network neutrality is going to have to deal with them at his peril.

Comment Re:First Polanski (Score 1) 315

EXACTLY! And that's the point! They managed to fit a typical romantic comedy movie into a 30-second "elevator pitch" without even stating anything directly! Look at it as a short story - a MICRO-story - and think of how much story they compressed into it - because it's just references, so viewers are really making up the whole story in their own heads.

Comment Re:Ill conceived and poorly worded (Score 1) 409

They can't be done for cheaper than Flash, though, which is the only thing the bean counters that pay me care about.

To achieve similar levels of professionalism and quality in a training product (what I do for a living) using non-Flash tools would cost too much money and take too much time because it requires too much technical talent.

Flash looks good, accomplishes the goal in less time, and for less money. Doesn't mean it's technically better, only that it does what it's supposed to for less time and money.

Comment Re:I'm surprised white markets aren't more common (Score 1) 94

I'm sure that this is as much a possibility as reporting a bogus security flaw to a software company. It wouldn't take long for a proper chemist to determine that what they were testing wasn't the real thing. On the up side, it could mean more science jobs and thus more of a push for better geeky ed in public schools.

Comment n900? (Score 1) 308

Someone should tell him about the n900 w/ Maemo5. Now THERE'S a good OS. Not quite as good as pure debian... but much better than Android. Unless of course Linus WANTS to port gitk (or any other GUI tool) to the Android GUI library instead of well... just _running_ it.

Comment At first I thought Vermont, too small (Score 1) 19

But if they're willing to return to a 1791 lifestyle and then work their way back up from there- well, it was a Republic of it's own before, and could be again.

But I think I'd rather have the vast natural resources of Cascadia to play with- we've got our own oil wells, heavy metal mines, gold mines, and a huge agricultural infrastructure.

Slashdot Top Deals

According to the latest official figures, 43% of all statistics are totally worthless.

Working...