HTTPS means that you have a securely encrypted connection with the remote server. Not that the people who own the remote server are going to keep your privacy sacred.

Or explained even easier. It's profitable.

I can't imaging a countryside where a lot of the people have these being invaded very easily.

The Earth: It is a large sphere. As equatorial insolation becomes extreme it falls off as a sine of the latitude. It cannot go unsurvivable for humans without the Earth shifts its orbit or the sun goes nova. Climate changes happen gradually enough that you could walk to your new best climate. To suffer the ills projected by the warmists you would have to stand your ground on your beachfront property for three generations and refuse to move.

Since this article isn't going to be accepted I may as well reply. The answer to your question is: don't. Don't redefine yourself as signature bits.

If you've got some anonymous activism to do then school up on the methods and practices that it would be self-defeating to educate you on here.

If you need to do secure communications it would behove you to stay away from the Internet and work on the primitives like blind drop and clear sign.

If you must do some confidential stuff over the Internet use serious encryption with keys manually passed.

Apple's coders are really, really bad. Until you compare them to Microsoft's team.

I haven't had one score this low in quite a while. Somebody is really scared. That bears investigation.

The guys at the top build their castles. And then we rip out the copper wires from the walls and sell them on eBay. We commercialize laughing at their hairpiece. The Internet turns your whole nihilistic POV upside down. It doesn't have to be Gangham style level of meme to make money.

Let's go with habitable for humans then. How many degrees C increase do you think it would take before the vast expanses of the Russian and Canadian Arctic, more surface area than man lives in now, were rendered uninhabitable to humans because it was too hot for men to live? 20C? 30? 40? If summer temps increased by 40C in some of these places, the locals would take to wearing shorts in summer in the sunny spots but would still need polar down in winter and on the North side of the mountain. In the wildest possible extrapolation of your runaway global warming scenario, could 40C possibly happen? No. You're freaking out about 0.6C of warming as if it wasn't a good thing. If it swung the other way, billions would die.

A scientist does not find lack of evidence convincing proof of anything.

It's my experience that people who say things like this are completely fucking clueless idiots poorly parroting what they think they heard.

Let me help you out. Some three million years ago when CO2 levels were the same as now, and average temps were 8C higher than now, this place had a nice habitat for fir trees that has since moved South. Fir trees don't grow there now because it is too cold. If because the level of CO2 has again reached these prior levels the temperature increases in this place again, then fir trees will grow again. Implicit in that is that the region might support human habitation and agriculture without external logistical support. Because the latitude includes about one third of the Earth's terrestrial surface area, it's a pretty big deal.

Sorry. On a sterilized scalpel as it enters the patient there is a quantifiable average number of bacteria on that instrument. The number is not zero.