Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: what a douche (Score 4, Interesting) 166

I believe the primary obstacle is that the gov't [particularly the federal gov't] loathes actually hiring people. they want to outsource everything, because of the mantra "private industry steals the best". and then to make sure only the crappiest companies bid on the project, make everyone submit hundreds of pages of mostly useless paperwork, and then pick the lowest bidder, regardless of ability to actually perform the work. Then, when the lowest bidder fails, award the contract to a close friend's company, and whatever price they suggest, because "it has to get done by yesterday".

Comment Re:And this is the same for copyrights. (Score 1) 240

it's both. the new molecule is similar enough that they argue that you can't make the generic without infringing the new patent and of course they stop making the old drug because the new improved version only costs 10% more for only a small decrease in effectiveness.

Comment Re:And this is the same for copyrights. (Score 2) 240

except big pharma games the system, where they release a drug under patent protection, then shortly before the patent ends, they re-patent the drug to cover some other condition, then say that generics can't make the drug for the first condition because they can't prevent it from being used for the second.

and in Canada, we are helpfully extending our patent time limits under the still secret Canada-EU trade agreement that Harper just signed. The Canadian people are too stupid to understand it, so we can't find out what he agreed to.

Comment Re:And this is the same for copyrights. (Score 1) 240

why does it have to continue on after the creator dies?
why not just a straight up fixed term, like 10 years?

certainly most stuff now makes their money fairly quickly, and the only thing long copyright length does [for the majority of things covered by it] is basically a lottery hit [way down the road, something randomly becomes super-popular for no particular reason, like the rick-roll].

does anybody believe any band of the last 100 years went "man, there's no point to writing this song if we don't get paid royalties from it for at least 25 years after we die"

movies make the vast majority of their money in the first couple of years, between the movie theatre release, then DVD/online movie sales.

Comment Re:Hulu sucks. (Score 1) 91

of course, the film was completely paid for, in advance. an 'indie film' is normally a small budget film with backers that receive a share of the profits of the film.

this is a film funded by backers who received a copy of the film [or rather "a license to view it"] in exchange for backing it.

all that's left is gravy....for the ones who didn't risk anything [I guess other than getting a bad rep for possibly making a bad movie].

Slashdot Top Deals

This file will self-destruct in five minutes.

Working...