We are completely unable to make a tank that can survive a modern anti-tank missile, what on earth makes you think we can make an unstable (bipedal walking) robot even more survivable than that?
Once we start mining the Moon we make them out of Gundanium. That'll make them indestructible!
What actual advantage would a mech have over a conventional tank?
Intimidation factor? Badassery?
P.S. If you in any way thought that this entire thread was actually meant to be a serious discussion on the merits of BattleMechs in a real life combat setting... I think it's time for your meds.
And how much of that speed do you actually notice as a human? Hell, how much of the speed gain actually matters in the scheme of your day? When I went from a 400 MHz to a 1.5 GHz what was a 4 hour compile became a 1 hour compile for the same program. Got a Core 2 Duo 2.1 GHz and the compile time for the same piece of code went down to 30 minutes. Up that to my current system (i7 4770k 3.5 GHz - 4 cores read as 8 with the HyperThreading) and the same piece of code compiled in 25 minutes. In about the mid-2000's I stopped having to upgrade hardware just to keep up with performance. That's when it turned into I only upgraded my hardware when a component failed and I could run any game or process intensive program I wanted until then. My current system was built 2 years ago. It's still going strong and I doubt I'll need to upgrade for at least another 10 provided the hardware doesn't crap out prematurely. The system I had previous lasted nearly 9 years and I only changed the Motherboard about halfway through its life because the BIOS chip cooked itself in a brownout. Tout your benchmarks all you want, they're not useful to me. What's useful to me is the actual output of "time
Don't get me wrong; more speed in computing is something I think should be striving for, regardless of how much faster the next generation really is, but the improvements curve has reached a plateau and it's going to take a major breakthrough in tech before performance starts the exponential and meaningful hand over fist increases like we had in the 80's, 90's and the first part of the 00's.
The man who built the free email encryption software used by whistleblower Edward Snowden, as well as hundreds of thousands of journalists, dissidents and security-minded people around the world, is running out of money to keep his project alive.
Werner Koch wrote the software, known as Gnu Privacy Guard, in 1997, and since then has been almost single-handedly keeping it alive with patches and updates from his home in Erkrath, Germany. Now 53, he is running out of money and patience with being underfunded.
"I'm too idealistic," he told me in an interview at a hacker convention in Germany in December. "In early 2013 I was really about to give it all up and take a straight job." But then the Snowden news broke, and "I realized this was not the time to cancel."
Like many people who build security software, Koch believes that offering the underlying software code for free is the best way to demonstrate that there are no hidden backdoors in it giving access to spy agencies or others. However, this means that many important computer security tools are built and maintained by volunteers.
Now, more than a year after Snowden's revelations, Koch is still struggling to raise enough money to pay himself and to fulfill his dream of hiring a full-time programmer. He says he's made about $25,000 per year since 2001 — a fraction of what he could earn in private industry. In December, he launched a fundraising campaign that has garnered about $43,000 to date — far short of his goal of $137,000 — which would allow him to pay himself a decent salary and hire a full-time developer.
The fact that so much of the Internet's security software is underfunded is becoming increasingly problematic. Last year, in the wake of the Heartbleed bug, I wrote that while the U.S. spends more than $50 billion per year on spying and intelligence, pennies go to Internet security. The bug revealed that an encryption program used by everybody from Amazon to Twitter was maintained by just four programmers, only one of whom called it his full-time job. A group of tech companies stepped in to fund it.
Koch's code powers most of the popular email encryption programs GPGTools, Enigmail, and GPG4Win. "If there is one nightmare that we fear, then it's the fact that Werner Koch is no longer available," said Enigmail developer Nicolai Josuttis. "It's a shame that he is alone and that he has such a bad financial situation."
The programs are also underfunded. Enigmail is maintained by two developers in their spare time. Both have other full-time jobs. Enigmail's lead developer, Patrick Brunschwig, told me that Enigmail receives about $1,000 a year in donations — just enough to keep the website online.
GPGTools, which allows users to encrypt email from Apple Mail, announced in October that it would start charging users a small fee. The other popular program, GPG4Win, is run by Koch himself.
Email encryption first became available to the public in 1991, when Phil Zimmermann released a free program called Pretty Good Privacy, or PGP, on the Internet. Prior to that, powerful computer-enabled encryption was only available to the government and large companies that could pay licensing fees. The U.S. government subsequently investigated Zimmermann for violating arms trafficking laws because high-powered encryption was subject to export restrictions.
In 1997, Koch attended a talk by free software evangelist Richard Stallman, who was visiting Germany. Stallman urged the crowd to write their own version of PGP. "We can't export it, but if you write it, we can import it," he said.
Inspired, Koch decided to try. "I figured I can do it," he recalled. He had some time between consulting projects. Within a few months, he released an initial version of the software he called Gnu Privacy Guard, a play on PGP and an homage to Stallman's free Gnu operating system.
Koch's software was a hit even though it only ran on the Unix operating system. It was free, the underlying software code was open for developers to inspect and improve, and it wasn't subject to U.S. export restrictions.
Koch continued to work on GPG in between consulting projects until 1999, when the German government gave him a grant to make GPG compatible with the Microsoft Windows operating system. The money allowed him to hire a programmer to maintain the software while also building the Windows version, which became GPG4Win. This remains the primary free encryption program for Windows machines.
In 2005, Koch won another contract from the German government to support the development of another email encryption method. But in 2010, the funding ran out.
For almost two years, Koch continued to pay his programmer in the hope that he could find more funding. "But nothing came," Koch recalled. So, in August 2012, he had to let the programmer go. By summer 2013, Koch was himself ready to quit.
But after the Snowden news broke, Koch decided to launch a fundraising campaign. He set up an appeal at a crowdsourcing website, made t-shirts and stickers to give to donors, and advertised it on his website. In the end, he earned just $21,000.
The campaign gave Koch, who has an 8-year-old daughter and a wife who isn't working, some breathing room. But when I asked him what he will do when the current batch of money runs out, he shrugged and said he prefers not to think about it. "I'm very glad that there is money for the next three months," Koch said. "Really I am better at programming than this business stuff."
Related stories: For more coverage, read our previous reporting on the Heartbleed bug, how to encrypt what you can and a ranking of the best encryption tools.
Republished from ProPublica. ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for their newsletter .
The man who built the free email encryption software used by whistleblower Edward Snowden, as well as hundreds of thousands of journalists, dissidents and security-minded people around the world, is running out of money to keep his project alive. Werner Koch wrote the software, known as Gnu Privacy Guard, in 1997, and since then has been almost single-handedly keeping it alive with patches and updates from his home in Erkrath, Germany. Now 53, he is running out of money and patience with being underfunded.
Of course they do, on a schedule, when the system is minimally used. Where I work this usually means that the updates get pushed into production on a Sunday (branch offices are guaranteed no business on Sunday) after they've been verified to not crap out on the Model environment. And Model doesn't get the rollout until the update has been verified in the Test environment for at least a week. Also, on mission critical systems, updates are only rolled out once a month at the fastest for only the most critical security updates. Other updates occur once per Quarter. Outside of this plan, if the main system and its redundancies go down any other time, someone's head is going to roll. The Data Center is not to go completely down during production hours for any reason, whatsoever.
Why did the Roman Empire collapse? What is the Latin for office automation?