Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Here's the facebook part of my /etc/hosts (Score 2) 147

The advantage of using Privacy Badger is that it doesn't rely on a constantly maintained list. It looks at how domains are being used, if they are tracking you by pulling the same cookies on different sites, and if they offer anything useful. It then automatically blocks useless/invasive ones, all without any effort on your part.

If you are too lazy to maintain a list or want your non technical friends and relatives to be safe, it's a good solution. Use both, they complement each other.

Comment Re:Salespeople making salespitch (Score 1) 387

While I agree with you and the GP, one thing I would say is that most of the world doesn't give a shit about cursive writing and I don't know why it is still taught in the US. Hand writing, joined up, legibly, sure. But cursive just seems like teaching Latin, maybe because of tradition or something.

Comment Re:Joy! (Score 1) 54

Bingo. You are not the product, your personal information is. You gave that information away for free, so don't get any compensation. Due to the special nature of the information it has some special protections, but that's it.

Next time some company asks for my data I'm going to offer them a subscription service.

Comment Re:The goal hasn't changed. (Score 1) 185

The author also vastly underestimates the Iranian navy. They have some fairly advanced subs that would cause major problems for any attacking navy. They also have some of the fastest and deadliest torpedoes in the world, and some effective anti-ship missiles. Dingies would be the least of the US navy's worries.

Yeah, they used them in the past, because they didn't need any more. They were not trying to start a war, and lasers would have been a huge escalation.

Comment Re:Updates (Score 1) 119

I think we are going to need some mass consumer legal action to force the issue. In the UK the Sale of Goods Act requires devices to last a "reasonable length of time", which for cheap TVs is usually thought to be about 5 years and for expensive ones maybe 10 years. If the TV breaks down before then the retailer, not the manufacturer, has to sort it out. If it was half way through its expected life they could either fix it or give you a partial refund for lost functionality. A dead TV would get you a 50% refund, one where the smart features are broken would be based on how much you use the feature and decided by a court if needs be.

Some TVs from 2011 are losing YouTube support. I use the YouTube app on my TV every day. Replacement of this lost functionality would require something like an Amazon FireTV stick for £35. I would expect the retailer to offer me that, or at least part of that cost, if my TV broke down before it is 10 years old. It might not be a lot, but the retailer has to pay it and it might force manufacturers to try a bit harder.

Having said that, even if you were screwed, a FireTV stick or similar is so cheap now it's not a massive loss. If you get 3+ years of app use out of the TV that's good, and don't forget the smart features include other useful stuff like recording to USB HDD and streaming via DLNA etc.

Comment Re:Updates (Score 2) 119

I have a Panasonic smart TV. The only place it has ads is in the app store, nowhere else. If it did I would have returned it, or not bought it in the first place. Not all smart devices are maximum evil, ads everywhere all the time etc.

Mine has an OS based on FreeBSD. I use the smart features to watch YouTube pretty much every day. Various electronics and woodworking video blogs mainly. I use the network media player from time to time too. It's a good system from 2012.

Slashdot Top Deals

"One lawyer can steal more than a hundred men with guns." -- The Godfather

Working...