Curious how you felt about photographers who didn't want to shoot gay weddings getting forced to do that by the courts.
The only case I have heard of that happening was when the photographer had signed the contract to do it, and then realized after signing that it was a gay wedding. I have not heard of anyone being forced to do anything for a homosexual couple that they had not already signed up for. It was the photographer's own dumbass fault for not having looked more closely at the names of the customers.
But guns? The debate quickly bifurcates between those who want everyone to have the right to own an gun with no conditions, and those who want it controlled so that only specific groups - including themselves, of course - can own one.
I guess that makes it similar to the pot debate here, then. When debating pot on slashdot (really, debating is not an accurate term as no debate is allowed) you either support everyone getting as stoned as they want, any where they happen to be, any time they want, with no consequences whatsoever, or you are a goddamned fascist bastard from hell. Also similar I see lies from both sides.
It's a political/religious war. Common sense not included, or welcome.
Clearly. The actual tragedy though is that mental health ends up bundled into the same category now as well.
Unless preventing the easy impulse methods is accompanied by better mental health care, all you're doing is kicking the can down the road.
Kicking the can down the road is still (very marginally) better than the US-endorsed strategy to date of pretending the can doesn't exist.
Thank you for coming in to the discussion. It is good to see at least one other sane person responding to this.
Firearm accidents barely made it onto the chart I was looking at with 22 unintentional firearm deaths for the 10-14 year old category.
First of all, they are dramatically underreported, as has been shown numerous times. Second of all, I mentioned shootings, not just deaths. Fortunately a fair number of the shooting victims manage to survive, but that is only by luck (usually aided by the fact that the accidental shooter is often a child as well).
Firearm deaths are hardly the "low hanging" fruit on things killing children in the US, and it hardly happens "every single day"
Read the news. It is not hard to find an accidental shooting every single day in this country that involves a child. Hell, there were three accidental shootings in Houston involving children over the weekend. It does happen every day, and it is the fault of irresponsible gun owners.
Hence why most "gun nuts" get more than a little agitated when it is used as a reason to take away their rights.
Did I say anything about taking away rights? No, I did not. I even said that most owners are responsible. I just want people to be responsible. We have a lot of irresponsible shit-heads leaving loaded unlocked weapons sitting around like they are toys, and this is the result.
And your bit about the age of a child is a straw man argument. I follow the standard definition of a child being under 18. And even at that the accidental shootings that I pay the most attention to are the ones involving kids under 10.
Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to work.