Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Still going (Score 1) 488

Exactly. Everybody talks now about iPhone and iPad because those two products became a money printing machine for Apple, but the original iMac and the eMac were astounding products at its time. After all, the eMac became a consumer product by popular demand, not because Apple expected it to be sold outside the education market.

Comment Re:Google Proxy War (Score 1) 278

Still, what Google trough Motorola is trying to do is to pull a Rambus over wireless networking technology. Thats as low they can get. If Microsoft's case is meritless then it should be discarded, but Google nor Samsung, or the holding managing Nortel patents shouldn't use standard essential patents in this way. What's next? HP should have many networking patents of their own, and from their purchases of DEC and Palm. Shall we pay to HP every time we purchase a printer with a NIC?

Comment Re:Google Proxy War (Score 1) 278

The visceral reaction to Android by Jobs was due the fact that Google's Smichdt was on Apple's board at the time of the initial development of the iPhone and it was really hard not to say that he was more of a corporate spy than a honest board member from a partner company, at least from Jobs POV. Who wouldn't be pissed of because being backstabbed by a person you trusted?

Comment Intel? (Score 1) 447

Didn't Intel started to offer foundry services? If Apple makes Intel an offer they can't reject Apple could start to offer their products using chips one process node behind Intel but one process node ahead of their competitors. The increases in battery life and speed could make them like the Microsoft-Intel combo of the 1990's, and still being able to charge a good premium in their products. See thunderbolt for an example of Apple-Intel collaboration.

Comment Re:Math (Score 1) 576

Because the USA's economy at this time sucks for almost everyone regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation or age and that is a big drawback for any incumbent and his party in any barely functioning democracy. That's why I think republicans had the election in the bag, but by pandering too much to their extreme right wing they ended losing. See

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/11/07/us/politics/obamas-diverse-base-of-support.html?ref=politics
http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/11/poll-latino-vote-devastated-gop-even-worse-than-exits-showed.php?ref=fpa

From the NYT I'm impressed with the strong push toward democrats by young voters in Arizona.

Best Regards

Comment Re:Math (Score 1) 576

The problem for Republicans was that they instead of using Clinton's "It's the economy stupid!" to get the election in the bag they conceded all the racial minorities votes to the Democrats, they created a handicap for themselves of 20-30% of the electorate. On top of that, they alienated women, that are the majority of population, regardless of race, they alienated religious moderates that are a majority of Americans and with their hate against gays they alienated not only the LGBT community, but also the young population that have friends in that community. The Republicans played this election to lose.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Why can't we ever attempt to solve a problem in this country without having a 'War' on it?" -- Rich Thomson, talk.politics.misc

Working...