Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Be careful of the term "terrorist attack" (Score 1) 727

by tehcyder (#49353227) Attached to: Germanwings Plane Crash Was No Accident

my first guess is that he's an ISIS sympathizer

I'm not sure a terrorist who had control of a plane and didn't mind killing themselves would just dive into a mountain. Why not turn round and crash into the airport? Surely you'd be bound to cause more death, destruction and disruption?

Comment: Re:Actually you gave Costco that right (Score 1) 260

by tehcyder (#49346491) Attached to: RadioShack Puts Customer Data Up For Sale In Bankruptcy Auction

Well technically he still has the right to refuse an unlawful search of his person ...

For those unfamiliar with costco they are not searching your person. They ask you to show your receipt and they take a quick look through and under your shopping cart.

Thankyou, some of the posters above were making it sound like you were being given a full cavity body search at gunpoint.

Comment: Re: Hmmm (Score 1) 260

by tehcyder (#49346417) Attached to: RadioShack Puts Customer Data Up For Sale In Bankruptcy Auction

That goes both ways. I have a concealed carry permit and I DO carry my firearm everywhere. If a security guard were to so much as grab a gun in a manner threatening towards me, I'll blow his fucking head off.

Hey guys, it's the Navy Seal guy with over 300 confirmed kills! Let's see if we can feel his muscles.

Comment: Re:No deadly force to protect property (Score 1) 260

by tehcyder (#49346357) Attached to: RadioShack Puts Customer Data Up For Sale In Bankruptcy Auction

Many states, including my home state of WV, have "stand your ground" laws where the bar to use deadly force is very low. In WV all that is required is a notice posted "Private property. No trespassing. Violators will be shot" notice. It is quite silly really. Our stand your ground law puts Florida's to shame!

If I saw a sign that actually said THAT, I'd be pretty STUPID to trespass, now wouldn't I?

As a non-American, if I saw a sign like that I'd assume the owner was joking, and if I did get shot I'd expect the police to arrest the arsebiscuit for attempted murder.

Comment: Re:Hmmm (Score 1) 260

by tehcyder (#49346263) Attached to: RadioShack Puts Customer Data Up For Sale In Bankruptcy Auction

Interestingly most people seem to think that those people have some power to actually stop or detain you. I to just keep on walking, the worst that has ever happened is that person at the door yelled "Hey you stop! I need to check your receipt!" If you choose to not stop and they attempt to detain you the law is on your side since you can bring false imprisonment charges against them provided you haven't actually done anything else other than leave or attempt to leave with your legally purchased items.

If you haven't stolen anything, why would you decide to act like an arsehole? Does the little thrill of power over annoying someone on minimum wage doing his job make you feel better about yourself?

I don't get it.

Comment: Re:Wait... what? (Score 1) 228

by tehcyder (#49345935) Attached to: How Nuclear Weapon Modernization Undercuts Disarmament

One of the 'good actors' was the first to develop and has been the only one to ever use nuclear weapons. Despite there being no military reason for it other than to demonstrate a more efficient method of killing civilians than anything that had been developed before.

This is just another way to say "The US is bad and everyone else is oh-so-wonderful" which is a popular theme around /.

No, it's a way of saying "the US is the only country to have used nuclear weapons against mass civilian targets." Whether you think it's justified or not does not affect the truth of that statement.

Comment: Re:Countries without nuclear weapons get invaded (Score 1) 228

by tehcyder (#49345679) Attached to: How Nuclear Weapon Modernization Undercuts Disarmament

> I can't think of any state that managed to stave off invasion because it had chemical weapons...

Yep. If you're fighting a modern military, it will be effectively immune to chemical or biological weapons. The only thing you can do with those is to get very lucky with a sneak attack, or attack civillian populations.

I think when Tony Blair was twatting on about Sadaam Hussein having WMDs that would reach Britain, the assumption was they would be used to attack civilians. If they had existed, that would have been a good reason for Britain not to invade Iraq. So it was lucky they didn't exist and we did invade...Hold on.

I do not fear computers. I fear the lack of them. -- Isaac Asimov

Working...