I agree. And if it's just a minority that we're hearing, I'd kindly ask the British pro-EU majority to stand up.
part of the problem is that, at the moment, horrible,racist,bigoted arseholes from UKIP(euro-sceptics and SEVERELY right wing) are getting shitloads of airtime and have been for a while.
Twice now when their leader Nigel Farage came to Edinburgh here in Scotland
Scotland , in my guess will become independent after the referendum in September due nto all the utter bullshit and hideeous shit the conservatives are doing such as privatising the NHS by the back door and treating the poor, the sick and disabled like criminals and getting their rags such as the daily mail to run campaigns slamming the poor, and such like.
For example they like to say that people are scrounging on benefits and are defrauding the DWP.. when in fact only 0.7% of the entire DWP budget is sucked up by fraud and half of that is.. INTERNAL!.. meanwhile sick and disabled people are being declared fit for work while terminally ill.. being penalised for having an extra bedroom when they need one for their carer/medical care/children.. it's a fucking disgrace.
luckily in Scotland we have protected universal free education,healthcare,prescriptions etc and the money is ring-fenced to protect the NHS in particular.
Scotland is pro-eu however we won't go for the euro.... not yet anyway due to the shenanigans going on atm. however should all go well and it's a YES vote in september then Scotland would remain in the EU and the EU will appreciate that as we have the largest oil and gas reserves in Europe.. not just the north sea but also off the west of Orkney and the west coast but also off Rockall (whichever Whitehall minion annexed that lump of rock saying it was in Scottish water did scotland a huge favour..LOL).. we are also a world leader in renewables too and everyone loves our whisky! mind you even without the oil/gas Standard and Poor(credit agency which downgraded the UK's AAA rating) would give an independent Scotland a tyriple A rating... much grooviness... roll on the vote!
How to you account for the economical benefits?. Do you think Schiphol would be a a an attractive airport if there would still be bordercontrols in the EU? How about your harbors?
Schipol is a major international hub with many transatlantic flights starting and finishing there, it'd be huge even outwith the EU
http://www.ecb.europa.eu/stats/exchange/eurofxref/html/eurofxref-graph-usd.en.html
The euro started at about $1.17, in 1999. It's now about $1.35. The highest value was close to $1.60, just before the 2008 crash.
that high of $1.60 was due to Khadaffi trading his oil in euros.....
Since the BBC makes its money from the license fee, not from advertising, it has no concept of "return" for a particular program. And, while viewer figures are not totally ignored, it is regarded as having some mandate to put on programs for minority groups not well catered for by commercial TV - such as, for example, amateur astronomers.
The BBC also makes ASSLOADS of money from commercial ventures and selling their programming and licensing overseas. They actually do have a mandate under their public service obligation to produce certain types of programming.
well maybe he could have an omnitool to replace the screwdriver
nice one
You also should consider that if the military really did hate the Prime Minister, the oath does make for a very good excuse to not listen to him, if forced to make a choice. Even if they usually could care less about it.
you never mentioned any survey, not at all.
you haev never had any military experience have you? Colchester Military Corrective Training Centre were the words that sprang to mind with regards to your statement.
And BTW it's "Couldn't care less".. which indicates that you don't care less. if you COULD care less then that says you do actually give a shit.
A lot of people in the UK actually like the monarchy, including lots of people in the army who technically swear allegiance to *her*.
the armed services don't get a choice, it's not a matter of fact that they "like" the queen, it's a matter of fact that the oath says that they swear "allegiance to her majesty the queen, her heirs and successors and the officers set above me"
i know as i once took that oath as a member of The Parachute Regiment and to be quite frank none of us gave two flying fucks about the queen or her heirs and successors.
If you had actually read the links you'll see she and the plug lugged Charles have actually used the veto on several occasions.
I would disagree. It's nice to think that royaly has some for of power in the country, but in reality they do not (at least, not in the UK). The Queen's speech will have been written for her by Parliament, so in instances like this, her opinions are not really her own. Many Brits will agree (though not all), that having a monarchy does a great deal of good for our nation and the commenwelth, strengthening reltationships, and providing a massive tourist industry. Worth every penny in my books.
you having a laugh?? this is the 21st century! why the hell should an accident of birth dictate your station in life or the influence you have over affairs of state???
As it happens the queen and prince Charles DO have a fair bit of say and have actually VERY much influenced things and can VETO bills and acts of parliament and have done so on various occasions
check these
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jan/14/secret-papers-royals-veto-bills
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2262613/Queen-Prince-Charles-given-39-chances-veto-legislation-dont-want-law.html
and to be quite frank FUCK THAT.
they also cost the tax payer a fortune but the main point being... why the fuck should some unelected bunch have the right to veto democratically proposed and approved acts and bills just because of an accident of birth.???
value for money my aching ass , it's an affront to democracy and this idiocy has no place in the 21st century... not at all
"I have just one word for you, my boy...plastics." - from "The Graduate"