Howard Stern Coming To the Net 334
theodp writes, "To promote an Internet radio service Sirius is launching this week, Howard Stern's 4+ hour program will be made available live online for free on October 25 and 26. The new Sirius service will offer 75+ channels of CD-quality programming for $12.95/month with no need to buy a Sirius satellite receiver."
13 bucks a month? (Score:5, Insightful)
How much for the service without Howard? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who? (Score:2, Insightful)
Who cares? (Score:3, Insightful)
Advertisement (Score:5, Insightful)
come again? (Score:1, Insightful)
No commercials is worth it to me. (howard stern has commercials)
Now offering 75 channels streaming online... i'm listening to sirus ATM in a cafe.. and it SUX compared to good old Shoutcast. Winamp has what.... 200+ stations that you can tweak the audio output of. Plus you do not need a browser window to keep the stream up. I like the freedom that satellite brings to the sheep, but i would never pay to listen online.. that is just absurd.
Re:Nothing new here, move on (Score:2, Insightful)
People said the same thing about Cable TV. (Score:3, Insightful)
I never listened to Howard when he was on terrestrial radio but now I do on Sirius. He's funny and there are some interesting interviews. Not all the time mind you but a fair amount of time.
To the prudes out there that can't stand to hear what he has to say, don't listen. Turn the dial.
$13 bucks a month is worth having something to listen to on the way to work. There are more then just Howards 2 stations to listen to.
Stern == Boring (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:How much for the service without Howard? (Score:5, Insightful)
I was with you at first, but the quoted bit above is where you lost me. You don't like him, you don't want to listen, you were glad when he left regular radio...man, that's cool.
The whole "they tell you what to think" rap...eh, not so much. I've listened to Howard for years, and point blank, it's entertainment. Nothing more, nothing less. Actually, Howard and the crew are really smart people. Sure, you tend to get a liberal slant on the occassions they delve into truly important topics, but at the same time, they tend to call things what they are.
Re:$13 a month... (Score:5, Insightful)
Frankly I'm surprised that Sirius isn't offering this subscription for less. $13/month is about what a regular radio subscription costs, and that includes access to the internet feeds. Since you can get Sirius radios for as low as $60 it'd make more sense to buy a radio and monthly subscription to get both radio & internet access instead of $13/month for just internet access.
If you dont like it, then dont listen (Score:5, Insightful)
Thanks,
the 5+ million Sirius subscribers
Surprise (Score:2, Insightful)
More relevant to the topic, I hope they don't take away net access to the people who already have subscriptions, or make them pay extra for it.
Re:CD-quality programming . . .Yeah right (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh, and that cable TV analogy doesn't work for me. It's true, but it doesn't work
Anyway, I just ended up getting satellite radio service as a built-in feature for the trim level I got on my car. I don't plan to continue the service after the initial free trial period.
Re:stern = hack radio (Score:4, Insightful)
Howard is WAY past his prime, anyway. He's an interesting guy, and is even capable of the occasional intelligent insight. But the daily grind of listening to him go on...and on...and on...and on...and on about strippers/lesbians/his dick/porn stars/etc. tends to get VERY old, very fast.
When he was in his heyday, I listened to him. He had some interesting stuff to say and his interviews were truly unique (who else could have gotten away with asking Julia Roberts how big Liam Neeson's dick was?). But it was, at best, one good segment for every 15 lame ones. And that was in his HEYDAY (10-15 years ago).
Besides, without the FCC or his wife to mock anymore, what's really left for him to do? He's like an aging knight in a world where all the dragons have already been slain.
-Eric
Re:stern = hack radio (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:"CD quality programming" (Score:3, Insightful)
Now it's 10 months later, and frankly, I'm over Stern. I didn't think I could live without listening to his show, but due to his and his company's paranoia, I was forced to. Now, I have no desire to subscribe to Sirius. I started listening to the show that replaced his, and while not as funny as Stern, it's funny enough. I can listen over the Internet, in my car, and from my regular stereo at home.
Lesson that they should have learned: strike while the iron's hot. I would have subscribed back then, and I'd still be a subscriber. I'm sure I'm not alone. There's absolutely no justifiable reason to have not put streaming in place 10 months ago. Hell, they were already doing it with their music channels. It's not like they didn't have the technology already. Plus, they can DRM the hell out of those streams, making it practically impossible to save the digital stream. Sure, someone could've ran their line out into their line in and recorded the show and put it up on BitTorrent, but they could do that with any of the regular Sirius equipment just as easily [isohunt.com]. I suppose that's what you get when your business people don't listen to your technology people.
It always has...just getting worse lately. (Score:3, Insightful)
Ask yourself the same question the next time a Nintendo (proprietary gaming platform) or Google (proprietary search engine) blurb shows up. Many, if not most of Slashdot's stories are cheap, positive PR pieces for corporations open-source Slashdotters normally wouldn't support.
Re:stern = hack radio (Score:2, Insightful)
Unfortunately, too many broadcasters focused on reproducing the crass jokes rather than what really made Stern special. It doesn't appear you were able to get past that either.
Re:$13 a month... (Score:2, Insightful)
Not everybody in the world can receive the signal. (Though I do think the price is too high.)
Re:Howard Stern? Is it still 1995? (Score:2, Insightful)
The answer is nothing. And it doesn't cost them ANYTHING extra to transmit to me. Their signal goes out just the same, either way.
So in five years, I will have generated them $650. Possibly more as I imagine I will have bought a second reciever by then.
Multiple that $650 by a few million other people and you have a business model that is similar to Cable Tv, which also probably generated tremendous losses in the beginning.
Speaking of that, how much of that $130 figure you keep quoating is defrayed by the $100 i spent on my reciever + accessories. Not the full $100, of course, but some of that must have made it back to Sirius.
Re:How much for the service without Howard? (Score:2, Insightful)
But that's not the entirety of his show. Yeah, it's a large part, and despite what anyone thinks it makes me, I get a laugh out of most of it.
His interviews are the best. Whether asking serious questions, or the not so serious questions, no matter who is being interviewed, they tend to be interesting, and honest.
Bottom line, it seems like his worst detractors don't even listen to the show. They base their opinions on what they hear, and not what they know, and if that's good enough for you, great. It's just the Howard Stern Show, afterall.
If you're put off by any amount of the "adult oriented" humor, then yes, stay away. It doesn't mean that the Howard Stern Show isn't any good, or isn't entertaining, though. I think that's the point they miss, or don't want to hear.