Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Google is becoming irrelevant (Score 1) 165 165

I think the point is still Google has lost [some of] its relevanc[e].

"Relevancy" is said only by those who don't understand the root word. And not everything is an extreme. One event does not make the point that Google has lost all of its relevance. You do get points for properly spelling its, though.

Comment Re:Concorde 2.0 (Score 3, Interesting) 238 238

destined to meet the same ultimate demise for the same reasons. Too expensive, too noisy.

I imagine it will be targeted at high-priced trans-oceanic flights. It doesn't have to reach mach 1 until out over the ocean. I make those trips (at regular speeds of course) all the time, and my recovery time is getting longer and longer as I get older. This will be no doubt out of my price range, but for those who can afford it it's a big gain in productivity.

Comment Re:I'd go for being stuffed in a tube (Score 1) 394 394

This is one reason I want self-driving cars; it would mean every person in the vehicle could be rear-facing

Every acceleration would "pull" you away from the seat. That would quickly get annoying. In a car at least you're wearing a three-point belt. In the plane they were wearing simple lap belts.

Comment Re:as always.... (Score 4, Insightful) 204 204

My curiosity is who at NASA is responsible for the insurance not being bought.

Insurance is not magic. As the entity selling the insurance is making a profit, obviously purchasing insurance is a money-losing proposition, so its only function should be to mitigate disaster. Losing $110M is not a disaster, and therefore *not* buying insurance is the more responsible use of the taxpayer money.

We are drowning in information but starved for knowledge. -- John Naisbitt, Megatrends