Mice Produced Using Artificial Sperm 435
vasanth writes to tell us scientists have successfully grown mice from artificial sperm. The sperm was created from embryonic stem cells and implanted into female mice. There were a few problems, including that some of the mice showed abnormal patterns of growth and difficulty breathing. The hope here is to assist couples who are having difficulties with conception.
Help With Conception?! (Score:3, Insightful)
So let me get this straight: you want to help a couple make a baby... by making a baby somewhere else, destroying it, harvesting its biological material, and using that material to make another baby, which you then give to the baby-challenged couple?
I guess the big advantages to working for the Department of Redundancy Department is, you get double funding for everything, and there's always someone else around to do your work for you. But it does seem kind of wasteful, sometimes.
Female/Female Reproduction (Score:4, Insightful)
Money Talks, God + Common Sense Walk (Score:4, Insightful)
Damn.
Re:If god doesn't want you to to have kids... (Score:3, Insightful)
Regards,
Steve
Re:If god doesn't want you to to have kids... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Help With Conception?! (Score:2, Insightful)
I was thinking the same thing. Wouldn't it make more sense to harvest ADULT stem cells from the father's body to create sperm for his offspring rather than some other already fully formed embryo?
This way the gentic material is his and not someone else's.
Furthermore...you then get rid of the whole embryonic stem cell debate......unless.....of course....the whole idea was to get private money to blow... *shrugs*
Re:The Mice? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:If god doesn't want you to to have kids... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:They don't need us (Score:3, Insightful)
My wife made this mistake with one guy when she was about 20, but it only lasted for a few months. After that, she recognized the problem, and never got involved with assholes again.
The fact of the matter is that there's a lot of women out there with poor self-esteem, and there's a lot of asshole guys out there who gravitate towards those women and get involved with them. Guys like that have little trouble finding women to accept them, much like con-men who know how to pick out their victims. These probably aren't the kind of women you'd want to spend time with, but they're still capable of reproducing.
Re:If god doesn't want you to to have kids... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:OK, I'll be the party pooper here (Score:3, Insightful)
[I]s everyone ENTITLED to have children?
Is anyone entitled to tell anyone else NOT to???
Teriatary effects (Score:4, Insightful)
It's also a survival method. What if some new nasty disease or bacteria, etc, rendered a large portion of the human race largely incapable of reproducing naturally. It's always a good idea to have a backup plan... it's just a matter of not abusing the ability.
Re:Help With Conception?! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:If god doesn't want you to to have kids... (Score:2, Insightful)
Sad (Score:4, Insightful)
It is also degrading to babies.
Such technology is degrading to human beings.
It treats procreation as being nothing more then a biological process.
It makes something that should be held as a honor and a privilege ( being a parent )
into a commodity bought and sold in the laboratory.
When you reduce procreation to a commodity you reduce people to being a commodity.
Honestly this kind of technology is evil for the same reason slavery is evil.
people are not a commodity.
Re:OK, I'll be the party pooper here (Score:3, Insightful)
So, either you create a society where women can have kids young and still lead a fulfilling life (i.e. do what they want to do, either work or not) OR you create the technology to allow a higher percentage of women to have kids when they're older.
Re:They don't need us (Score:3, Insightful)
This can't be emphasize enough. Often the most beautiful women (both outside and inside) are the ones that have problems. Some think they can overcome it by becoming sluts. Others just don't date, or date men that know how to exploit poor self-esteem.
I see this in my own (extended) family. My wife's cousin, 20 years old, very beautiful, blond, sweet and loving, has a hard time dating. Two of her recent boyfriends have either been extremely needy and dishonest or been somewhat aggresive and helped her to make poor choices for her life. I just can't understand it. I just assumed beautiful people had it made. It turns out that even beautiful people can have self-image problems.
Re:OK, I'll be the party pooper here (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm not convinced that 'helping infertile couples have children' is the ultimate rationale - is everyone ENTITLED to have children?
Some people [bbc.co.uk] are random and prolific producers of offspring while others can't produce a single child while trying purposefully for years.
Who are you to make a moral judgement on who should not be helped?
Re:OK, I'll be the party pooper here (Score:3, Insightful)
That is NOT a moral judgement, it's common sense (or if you'd prefer - impersonally technical). No conception -> something's biologically wrong, possibly something with body plan/genetics -> even if conception is forced, there's a nonignorable chance that the children will have the same problem. Do YOU want to inflict that problems upon the children?
It's not strictly related to TFA, but these days, it's hard to tell if corrective medicine is actually helping "us" in the long term. In ages past, children who were not tough enough would simply die and, while grieving, nobody thought it "wrong". Now, such technically less viable children can be saved, but for who's good? Its or its parents? It sounds eugenical, but it's true that it makes the rich/medically advanced societies less resistant in the long term.
Re:Artificial Sperm? (Score:2, Insightful)
LK
Re:They don't need us (Score:3, Insightful)
In the 1950's hamburgers were a fraction of their current size, and most people were in the 5' range. 6' was considered tall back then. They slept in these "full" and "double" beds- king size was unneeded and queen size was enormous (my bedroom -built in the 1950's is built for a queen size in the master bedroom).
And both men *and* women have gotten much bigger over the last 100 years. A lot of "knights" armor and castles were clearly made for very small, short people. And then their are pigmies and other groups of people who are still naturally small (a lot of asians are still very petite).
Even at our current large size, anything over 8" requires that you take extra time and go slow until the lady warms up. An 8x6 is a monster of a piece that puts you in the top 1 to 2% of the population.
So for -most- women, having a 10 inch piece would be counter-selective at this time since it is too much. In the very recent past, even more so when most women were about 5' tall or less.
Secondly-- it only counts if a baby results in terms of selection.
Thirdly There are many other more visable things that matter too. Do you have hair, does your mouth stink, do you have black teeth, do you stink, do you have blackheads all over your nose, then
So pecker size is just a small piece of the puzzle. I would guess that a huge majority of straight and bi women want to do a guy with a big piece one time in their life as a checkmark.