Slashdot Bookmarks 171
The idea is that URLs are bookmarked, either using the javascript bookmarklett thingee or by directly visiting the bookmarks page. But when you are DONE bookmarking and tagging your URL, you can then write a journal or story submission about them. On a related note, journals are now directly submittable to Slashdot editors as well.
We plan to add RSS exporting as well as a few other features, but mostly what we're going to try to do is figure out ways to mine bookmarks for stories. You can best help by tagging bookmarks on the global bookmarks pages. This is all very experimental, so your help is appreciated.
Now as always on Slashdot we appreciate your feedback and bug reports. You can do this the slashdot SF project page. Or even better you could visit the site and consider submitting patches. Ideas are never in short supply here- time to code them all ALWAYS is. Join the mailing list! Or just start bookmarking and tagging stuff. Lastly, thanks to Tim Vroom who put all of this together.
update to clarify a point for the readers- this system is primarily an extension of our submission bin. You are welcome to bookmark & tag for your own pleasure, but our intent is that this system eventually be used to help us find content for the mainpage. So of course the functionality has overlap with other sites. No huge shock there. But our intentions is to use user bookmarks & tags as another input channel for editors picking stories for the audience.
Blog ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Redundancy (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Google Bookmarks (Score:2, Insightful)
But it has TAGS! They're like meta keywords but they're totally Web 2.0ified with scriptaculity!
Benefits (Score:5, Insightful)
Suggestion (Score:5, Insightful)
* Digg links gain popularity through votes. It seems
* Digg's whole site is based on link popularity. Slashdot has article posts still moderated by humans. The bookmarks are simply another source of information.
* Slashdot has a community of people who flag each other as friends and foes, read each others' journals, etc. Digg is full of only random meaningless comments.
Re:Great New Idea! (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes! Choice and competition are bad and evil! While we're at it, we should get rid of Firefox for splintering the web browser market.
Re:Redundancy (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:To CmdrTaco (Score:2, Insightful)
Brilliant attitude. Then nothing is ever improved. Whining--or, more accurately, constructive criticism--leads to positive change if it's listened to.
Public vs. private bookmarking (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Great New Idea! (Score:4, Insightful)
Feature request (Score:4, Insightful)
Give us some power over our own work please. Some of us work like Slashdot editors, with a tendency toward dupes and typos.
http:///..org (Score:2, Insightful)
Slashdot's domain name is intended to represent stuttering: "http colon slash-slash-slash dot-dot org". How is this significantly less annoying than del.icio.us?
That's not the point... (Score:3, Insightful)
You don't get it.
CmdrTaco:
But when you are DONE bookmarking and tagging your URL, you can then write a journal or story submission about them. On a related note, journals are now directly submittable to Slashdot editors as well.
The point is not to replace sites like del.icio.us, but to use a system similar to del.icio.us as an alternative way of submitting links/stories/etc to the editors for posting. If you want to use