Microsoft Providing Virtual Server Free 401
liliafan writes "In an effort to gain a market majority over VMware Microsoft announced it is giving Virtual Server away for free, additionally they will provide customer support for Linux. In a related move VMware have opened their partition file format to the community, aggressive and suprising moves in the virtualisation market."
Re:wow, more echoes from the past (Score:5, Informative)
You're mistaken. That's not how anti-trust law (in the US works). The question is whether consumers are harmed, not competitors. You can make a case that killing VMWare would be bad for consumers in the long run, but that'd be difficult to show today.
Bah... (Score:5, Informative)
And here is direct link to the Microsoft download [microsoft.com] page that requires registration.
Direct link to the 32bit version: here [microsoft.com]. (no reg required)
Direct link to the 64bit version: here [microsoft.com]. (no reg required)
Happy downloading.
Re:Microsoft Virtualization is the key to the futu (Score:3, Informative)
Also, remember, VM products aren't designed to run the latest and greatest games or something. They are designed to fill two niches, extremely secure testbeds for software where you want crashes to be easy to recover and server virtualization where one machine imitates several.
My submission about VMWare was rejected.... (Score:5, Informative)
It's a new product, still in beta... about equivalent to the GSX Server. They just released Beta 2 either today or yesterday. It's a _really_ good product. The current keys they're giving away expire, but they say the final version will also be free-as-in-beer.
Basically, it'll do everything Workstation will, plus it allows you to see the consoles of virtual machines that are on another computer. It also gives you a fairly rudimentary web-based control panel, wherein you can start, stop, or restart particular VMs. You can also set up user accounts, and restrict access to particular machines appropriately. It's not ISP-class, but it'd be damn useful for QA teams or suchlike.
Re:wow, more echoes from the past (Score:2, Informative)
It wouldn't be virtualization if it didn't have hypervisor services. Maybe you're talking about hardware virtualization, which was just added by Intel, so it was somewhat difficult for Microsoft to support this before.
Re:wow, more echoes from the past (Score:5, Informative)
And don't forget AMD/Intel (Score:4, Informative)
Re:My submission about VMWare was rejected.... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:wow, more echoes from the past (Score:3, Informative)
IE wasn't a big deal because Microsoft gave it away for free. It was a big deal because they bundled it with Windows.
Xen will run Windows soon (w/new CPUs) (Score:3, Informative)
Re:wow, more echoes from the past (Score:2, Informative)
VMWare makes quite a few virtualization products and they have been on the market for quite some time. They are pretty much the standard for virtualization. Years later, MS decides to enter the market. VMWare, wanting to survive has to do something. In the past 6 months, they have released two "free" products, VMPlayer which allows any Windows/Linux machine to run certain VMWare virtual machines and more recently, VMWare server which is very similar to the existing VMWare GSX line of products. They now have a wider range of products to compete at many different levels. The top is ESX with Virtual Center, this product allows different forms of clustering, state saving, seemless and automatic moving of VMs between different physical servers for failover and load balancing and much more. The bottom is the free VM Server products with VM Desktop and GSX in the middle.
MS, knowing that VM is opening up to a broader market and trying to gain a larger foothold, is also going to try saturation bombing with some form of free version to gain its own share of the market as well.
So far MS entering the market has been good for IT folks overall as VMWare is adding features and cheap or free products into the mix. Do or die I guess as I'm sure MS can sustain a lot more negatives then VMWare can in the long fight.
This is just bogus. (Score:3, Informative)
I know, I know, we've all heard it before, Microsoft is a convicted monopolist... but for what? Bundling a free (as in beer) web browser with their OS qualifies as taking advantage of their monopoly?
People get upset every time Microsoft gives something away for free, always claiming it pushes other companies out of the market. Newsflash: Netscape gave away its browser; so did Microsoft. Where is the "market"?
Mindshare != market.
Or are you effectively saying a company can NEVER compete with an OSS project, because the OSS project will always be free while it's "unfair" for the company to give something away from free? I am unclear what standard you wish to impose. Answer me this: if a company (Microsoft) wants to make a product, which has free open-source or otherwise equivalents in the market, is it anticompetitive practice to also release a free one?
Re:This is just bogus. (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Sorry, Microsoft, we know your tricks. (Score:3, Informative)
Windows Server 2003
Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1
Windows XP Professional Edition
Windows XP Service Pack 2
Not unexpected. MS is simply price matching VMWar (Score:3, Informative)
I'e been using QEMU which is GLP'd and does a few things neither of the above products do. However I have to admit that VMWare is slick. Good interface and easy to install.
Virtual Server is better than VMWare (Score:3, Informative)
a) Virtual Server is 64 on a 64 bit OS, if you want it, but VMWare was only available in 32 bit.
b) Virtual Server, running the application as VMWare, actually ran those apps 10% faster than did VMWare. Our application pegs the CPU for several hours, and so we felt that this was as good as test as any.
c) Virtual Server was easier to set up and use.
d) For the price difference, you could get another few datablades.
Your mileage may very, but the bottom line is, until you download Virtual Server and compare it to VMWare, don't believe the hype about performance, because, it may well be hype.
Good thing (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What kind of free? (Score:3, Informative)
They're giving away [microsoft.com] the OS licenses too...
"Better virtualization value. Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition provides better value in server virtualization. Licensing policy changes now allow customers to run up to 4 virtual instances of Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition on one licensed physical server or hardware partition."
Re:What kind of free? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:This is a good move for the consumer (hopefully (Score:3, Informative)