Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Clarification here (Score 5, Insightful) 395

Petapixel is reporting on her copyright infringement. As such they have a thumbnail screen shot of her site as proof. That thumbnail includes her logo, just barely readable. This woman needs to go back to law school and look up "fair use" and the difference between copyrights and trademarks. Next thing you know, she will be claiming copyright infringement for publishing her DMCA letter. If she really is practicing law then she ought to be disbarred for her behavior.

Comment: Browser filters, not site filters (Score 5, Insightful) 515

by MobyDisk (#40187541) Attached to: What Should We Do About Wikipedia's Porn Problem?

There is an easy reliable technological solution to this that has been around for 10 years, but no one uses it. There is a W3C standard for labeling pages as containing porn, violence, etc. Internet Explorer had support for blocking pages based on this as far back as IE5. But no one put the meta tags in and so the filters never worked. All Wikipedia should do is have contributors properly label the media, and allow the browsers to handle it based on the user's preferences.

Comment: Re:Get a refill.. (Score 1) 1120

by MobyDisk (#40169715) Attached to: Soda Ban May Hit the Big Apple

The weight of the people around you is :: drum roll :: none of your business!

That doesn't work if there is socialized medicine. It becomes part of your business because you are paying a portion of their health care. The problem is that we have some people who want social safety nets like socialized medicine or an uninsured driver fund, or free public hospitals; and some people who want individual rights. The two systems collide. So long as we have social safety nets, we will have "nanny state" regulation to go with it.

Since we now have a national health-care program, this type of legislation is just beginning. Maybe we just need an "opt-out" option.

Comment: Re:Cool tech, but (Score 1) 331

by MobyDisk (#40162181) Attached to: LG Aims To Beat Apple's Retina Display

and so are dithered?

No, that isn't dithering. LCDs can vary the brightness of those individual pixels. So the red pixel can be at 50% power for example. Whereas a printer cannot vary the intensity of a drop of ink - it is either there, or not there. So to get 50% intensity it must use at least two pixels, which is dithering.

Comment: This might be really good (Score 1) 133

by MobyDisk (#40159097) Attached to: Radiation Detecting Android Phone Coming To Japan

Today, radiation is a scary mystical thing, partially because people don't realize how common it is. Perhaps by having these detectors everywhere people will learn that radiation isn't the frighteningly scary thing that the media tells them it is. They will start measuring radiation everywhere: their friends, them selves, their electronics, the air, the soil, the rain, their mom's Fiestaware, their Grandma's Depression Glass. And they will start to see statistics and patterns. When they don't suddenly combust they might start looking at the numbers their detector gives them and start thinking: "Okay, the phone made lots of beeps and displayed a frowny-face: so what does that *really mean*?"

I imagine lots of people were scared by A/C power when Thomas Edison was electrocuting animals with it. But today it is all around us, and people are not scared of walking under power lines or going into their own homes. This may have the same effect.

Comment: In their defense... (Score 4, Funny) 251

by MobyDisk (#40135633) Attached to: Microsoft Wrongly Gives Britain the Day Off

but the holiday was postponed for a week to coincide with the Queen's diamond jubilee

In their defense, I must point out that the Queen of England writes terrible VBScript code. It probably is still being reviewed. If she wants to postpone a national holiday, she needs to get her changes committed at least 2 weeks prior to the hotfix release date.

Comment: Re:Slashdot... (Score 1) 681

by MobyDisk (#40132691) Attached to: The Shortage of Women In IT

Affirmative Action exists for a reason. If you think we don't need it, kindly explain to me why women working the same jobs as men make less money.

Be careful with that line of thinking. Shorter people also make less money for the same work. But affirmative action doesn't protect short people. Don't oversimplify the issue: affirmative action does not exist to make sure that everyone gets the same pay no matter what.

Comment: Women owned, veteran owned etc = junk (Score 5, Insightful) 681

by MobyDisk (#40132093) Attached to: The Shortage of Women In IT

The whole system of "veteran-owned" and "women-owned" businesses getting special privileges is a farce. I know of some companies that appoint veterans to certain positions just so they can be veteran owned. Or the veteran may have nothing to do with the company any longer. I know a company that is "woman-owned" because the owner put his wife on the board so he could get special privileges when bidding on government contracts.

Just when you thought you were winning the rat race, along comes a faster rat!!

Working...