Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 Released 479
KonijnenBunny writes "May 3rd sees the release of the 0.6 version of Mozilla's Thunderbird e-mail and newsgroup client, featuring improved junk-mail controls and a new brand identity, including a new Firefox-style icon.
I switched from some murky client which didn't exactly have a bright outlook regarding spam to Thunderbird a while back and was not dissapointed. Grab this latest version at Mozilla.org." Mac OS X users can also enjoy the new Pinstripe theme, which matches the previous theme of the same name applied to Firefox.
Background on the logo/icon design (Score:5, Informative)
Jon has been helping us with the visual identity work on Firefox and Thunderbird and doing some really great work.
Keep in mind, the artwork will continue to improve. Two issues we are particularly focused on improving are the small versions of the icons, and the visual consistency between the Firefox and the Thunderbird icons.
Oh, and the name is staying Thunderbird (Score:5, Informative)
Meanwhile (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Thunderbird (Score:3, Informative)
Thunderbird is most definetly NOT in Java. It's based on the Mozilla suite, which is all C or C++, and a lot of Javascript too.
Besides, even if it is slow (it isn't for me), it's still a lot faster than OE once you get a system full of viruses and stuff.
What's New: (Score:5, Informative)
Thunderbird now comes with an installer for Windows making it easier than ever to start using Thunderbird!
The new Pinstripe theme fits in with the look of Mac OS X.
The algorithm for the adaptive junk mail controls has been heavily redesigned to learn faster and catch more spam.
To be consistent with the Mozilla Foudation's goal of brand identity, Thunderbird has a new logo and supporting artwork thanks to the fine work of the Mozilla Visual Identity team.
IMAP users can now benefit from support for the IMAP IDLE command which allows the mail server to push notifications such as new mail arriving as soon as it arrives.
Thunderbird supports server-wide news filters that apply to all newsgroups on a server.
Thunderbird includes Secure Password Authentication using a new cross-platform NTLM authentication mechanism for IMAP, POP3 and SMTP.
Mail filters can now mark messages as junk.
Offline support is an optional download component in the Windows installer and is no longer a separately-downloaded extension.
Mac OS X users now get new mail notification in the system dock.
The DOM Inspector is an optional download component in the Windows installer for theme authors.
Tools > Options > Compose > HTML Options allows you to set up default HTML compose options such as font, size and color.
Attachments can be opened directly from the compose window to verify their contents before sending.
Thunderbird now supports the notion of multiple identities per mail account. This makes it easy to have several e-mail addresses which end up going into the same account. Read More [mozilla.org] about how to set this up.
In the case of a failure when copying a message to an online Sent folder, Thunderbird will now ask if you would like it to try again.
0.6 on Windows includes several improvements to Simple MAPI that allow it to work with older versions of Microsoft Office.
Pasting data from an OpenOffice.org spreadsheet no longer pastes random HTML garbage before the actual spreadsheet data into HTML compose.
Fixed several situations where LDAP connections were left open when using LDAP auto complete or performing searches on LDAP directories.
Improved view source behavior.
Mail notification for POP3 messages that are marked deleted or marked read by mail filters no longer occurs.
The "Mark All Read" keyboard shortcut now works for Linux GTK2.
Re:Is there hope for Mozilla? (Score:2, Informative)
however, we ensure our html is standards compliant and support ALL major browsers - the days of every site saying "we only support ie and netscape" are long gone (as far as i'm concerned anyway).
we support mozilla/firefox, ie, opera, netscape, safari, konqueror (think that's it!) on all applicable platforms.
mozilla have given us the browser and now developers can play their part in turning things around.
Important UPGRADE Notes (Score:5, Informative)
Upgraders: DO NOT install Mozilla Thunderbird into a directory containing program files from a previous version. Overwriting files from a previous release WILL cause problems. To re-use the directory of a previous install, the directory must be deleted and recreated, emptied, moved, or renamed. You should not file bugs in Bugzilla if you choose to ignore this step.
The program directory does not contain profile information; any existing accounts, account settings, options, e-mail, and news messages will remain intact. This release does not require changes to your profile to function properly.
Important: If you used a prior version of Thunderbird and installed themes OR extensions, you need to do the following or Thunderbird may NOT run properly. Find your profile directory. There should be a sub directory called chrome. Remove everything in chrome. This will not affect your mail data or preferences.
Kmail for Windows (Score:2, Informative)
There isn't? Oh no! I must do something about my imagination [sourceforge.net].
Re:Sluggishness (Score:1, Informative)
Re:IMAP? (Score:5, Informative)
Compacting Mail Folders with Mozilla Mail Client (Score:5, Informative)
Already there! (Score:4, Informative)
Warning - Good for SysAdmins, But be careful users (Score:4, Informative)
I switched my own laptop from XP-Outlook to Thunderbird 0.5 a few weeks ago, and I am delighted with the huge gain in performance, the improved virus protection, spam filtering as well as the fact that the new platform is Open-source.
However, when I did the import from Outlook, it mangled some of the email address and attachments, so I keep Outlook for backup purposes, so I can check old emails. I would not switch back, but just keep a record of all the files you use. Of course, we are all careful and audit-trail all of our work, aren't we!
To sum up: great product and project, but handle the delivery with care.
Re:OS X Mail (Score:3, Informative)
Usenet. I'm quite happy with Mail.app for email, and Thunderbird for reading newsgroups.
It's not about standards, it's about XUL (Score:5, Informative)
In fact, turn IE users away at the door.
This is utopian and dumb. If you are running a business there is no way you would be so stupid as to turn away 90+% of your customers at the door simply because you don't like the way they are dressed. Idealistic, yes. Web standards are well and good, but the real world intervenes.
Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. (Score:5, Informative)
Good point. FYI a quick search [google.com] only brings up one software package called thunderfox - a video game from the 80's, and a bunch of posturing on whether thunderbird will change it's name to thunderfox. Discarding those [google.com] just leaves us with people who call themselves thunderfox on the internet, and just happen to be talking about software. So if there is a software package called thunderfox, the authors apparently don't care about anyone knowing about it.
Re:IMAP? (Score:3, Informative)
So, you need to add the new account, finish the wizard, wait for it to sit there and go "the server says ssl only, fool", then go into the account settings, check the box, hit OK, quit thunderbird, relaunch thunderbird
What is new? (Score:3, Informative)
There were many things I liked a lot last time I looked. But these problems prevented me from switching.
Re:Better spam filters? (Score:5, Informative)
I switched to an IMAP setup at home - I have about 8-9 mailboxes on 4 different servers I check, getmail snags them all and courier serves them via IMAP. I use Thunderbird, TheBat and Mutt to read it. Nothing really special about the setup.
I haven't had time to implement any kind of server-side spam filtering, so I've been using Thunderbird (it's on the always-on desktop) to filter junk mail. The filtering is poor, to say the least. I've been using TB for about 4 months now, training it. I get a lot of spam - 100-150 piece/day - and right now it catches about 70%. Recently, I fed it about 6000 pieces of mail, all spam. It caught less than half. The false positive ratio is also too high for my liking - about 5-8%.
I probably wouldn't be bitching if it hadn't been for POPFile, which I used back when I was checking accts via POP. With POPFile, the accuracy rate ran at 98.5%. Nuff said.
Re:OS X Mail (Score:5, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Sluggishness (Score:5, Informative)
I just tried thunderbird 0.6. Let me say... Thunderbird 0.6 is VASTLY improved over 0.5. I don't know if it's because this isn't a packaged rpm, but the menus are SO much more responsive than 0.5. Opening a new email takes almost no time at all. I must say, 0.6 is a great improvement over 0.5. I think I may just move over to Thunderbird now, especially since I just found an extension for Mozilla Calendar for Thunderbird.
Re:Background on the logo/icon design (Score:3, Informative)
Will the new Thunderbird icons be made available under the same license as the Firefox icons? There unfortunately seem to be some issues with using them in the packages provided by various Linux distributions; please see this thread for details:
Debian Legal thread on Firefox trademark issues [debian.org]Re:OS X Mail (Score:2, Informative)
My two biggest wishlist features (Score:5, Informative)
I switched from Pine to Thunderbird a few weeks ago; here are the most important things I miss:
Another feature which would be nice to have (but not nearly as important to me) is support for mbox folders in subdirectories of the top-level mail folder.
Anyone know whether it's possible to do any of the above in Thunderbird? If not, what's the best way to make the feature request?
D-Spam (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What's New: (Score:5, Informative)
Re:IMAP? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:This is not funny, it is insightful. (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What is new? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Kmail for Windows (Score:3, Informative)
KMail on windows requires building a Cygwin install that may or may not NOT work at some point (I've had cygwin fail more often than not.)
So until I can run an installer and get KMail on windows, it's not built for windows.
Re:Mirror , just in case (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Evolution (Score:3, Informative)
Some reasons:
1) It STILL has few "freeze" bugs where it just goes unreactive and can not be recovered without killing the damn thing and restarting it. Those have been there forever, and for a software that old, absolutely should not exist any more. Heck, thunderbird is much younger and nevertheless lot more stable.
2) (this might be related to the first, or the milder case of same disease) It's very unresponsive every now and then when doing something, especially the IMAP support.
3) No bayesian spam filtering without resorting to external applications - which seems to trigger no. 1 very ofter.
Of course evo has some very nice pluses of it's own (calendar, virtual folders, etc.), so it's all about what you need...
Re:Better spam filters? (Score:5, Informative)
Improved Junk Mail Controls
The algorithm for the adaptive junk mail controls has been heavily redesigned to learn faster and catch more spam.
To get the best possible experience from the new junk mail controls, we highly recommend that you re-train the filters from scratch. Tools > Junk Mail Controls > Adaptive Filters > Reset Training Data. Be sure to train an equal number of good and junk messages. We recommend several hundred messages of each.
The enable/disable option for adaptive junk mail detection appears to apply to all accounts (Tools > Junk Mail Controls > Adaptive Filters). It is, however, a per account option. To set the option for a specific account, choose the account in the 'Account:' dropdown on the 'Settings' panel, then switch to the 'Adaptive Filters' panel and set the option. Repeat per account as needed.
Re:database back-end (Score:3, Informative)
Submit your suggestions (Score:4, Informative)
To those of you who actually want to see your suggestions implemented, I suggest you file a bug [mozilla.org] or at the very least, submit it for discussion at the Mozillazine Forums [mozillazine.org].
Re:Nitpick++ (Score:3, Informative)
Clearly you haven't experienced the joy of searching messages. Especially if there's 5000+ messages in the folder. Thunderbird manages to do it as I type, and I can still do other mail operations. Outlook 2003 still single-threads it and prevents me from even composing mail while it's busy doing it.
Opera indeed makes both of them look slow, but dear lord the bugs are heinous. I stick with Outlook where I have to use it: Outlook 2003 is great for organization, since I have several folders sorted and grouped (not so subtle RFE hint) differently.
I wonder, why not have a mail application use SQLite for the folder store? Or an arbitrary ODBC or JDBC URL? You get all that organization for free in such a case (including GROUP BY), to say nothing of more or less guaranteed data integrity...
Re:Compacting Mail Folders with Mozilla Mail Clien (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Pinstripe Theme? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:OS X Mail (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Include Mozilla Calendar! (Score:4, Informative)
Thunderbird can publish calendars that are compatible with Apple's iCal calendar format. It's not exactly a replacement for groupware-type stuff like Exchange, as far as I can tell, but you can subscribe to others' calendars and keep your own calendar online so that you can access it from whereever you want.
More info: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/faq.html
Re:So they've not renamed it? (Score:4, Informative)
I'm certainly pleased with Mozilla Lightningwhale.
new window
Mozilla Moonbadger.
new window
Mozilla Moonstarfish.
Re:Pinstripe Theme? (Score:4, Informative)
Hmmm... I'm running Mail 1.3.4 and have 4 inboxes, one for each mail POP3 account (3 are on one server, the fourth is a different server). Now, the way it looks visually, the 4 individual inboxes are listed UNDER a parent "Inbox", but there are actually 4 separate inboxes underneath it. Are we talking about the same thing?
I like the ease of being able to take an account offline by right clicking on an inbox icon. Most of the time I want my desktop receiving work email and don't want the iBook butting in, however when I'm off site with the iBook for work purposes I can have Mail fetch my messages.
Visual notification is here! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How do people archive old mail using Thunderbir (Score:0, Informative)
Takes a bit to set up but you won't be looking back. And you can also set up webmail with squirrelmail for internet cafe/kiosk access when you're away. It's very convenient, really.
Re:IMAP IDLE Support (Score:4, Informative)
Eh? I've always been stymied by people who view anything less than "1.0" as "not ready for the enterprise"
In the Open Source world, version numbers are somewhat irrelevant. One day it's
Simply put. All software has bugs. Version numbers are simply markers for points in time. While some builds are more stable than others, you shouldn't sit pining for a 1.0 version, when 0.6 is probably damn fine, and less bugs than Outlook.
Better yet, ever heard of the "3.0" Microsoft Schedule?
Microsoft tends to release software FAR too fricken early, known as 1.0 (Opensource would call that 0.2)... It's buggy, useless and not worth looking at.
Then 2.0 comes out, delivers the bare minimum of functionality, but still sucks featurewise, and has some significant bugs (Opensource calls this 0.5)
Then 3.0 comes out, delivers the promise of 1.0, not too buggy, but functional. Looks like a real app now. (Opensource calls this 0.8)
Then 4.0 comes out, and Has tons of bells and whistles, and a huge userbase, 'cause they've gone thru 4 versions. Opensource calls this 1.0
feh.
Re:Murky (Score:3, Informative)
And I'm not even kidding.
Re:database back-end (Score:2, Informative)
I thought it already used an internal database backend.
I was under the impression that the Mozilla Mail client uses Mozilla's "Mork" database engine to store all the messages as well as the address book data. I also assumed Thunderbird used the same infrastructure.
Re:One local mail tree? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Evolution? (Score:3, Informative)
I think evolution has potential, but it's got a ways to go - after I lost all my email from an update, I decided to dump it. I now use thunderbird. One of evolutions most annoying "features" was its inability to check mailboxes individually - it's always an all-or-nothing proposition. The stupid thing about it is that for those that you don't want to check, you have to cancel a series of password dialogs- every time, unless you set it to check certain boxes automatically- and that's not always a desired option.
Re:As a new MacOS X user, I have one question. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:How does this compare to Forte's Agent on Windo (Score:2, Informative)