Microsoft Runs Out Of Windows XP Family Licenses 340
TrAvELAr writes: "'There is a backlog,' says Mark Croft, lead product manager for Windows XP. According to this article on IDG, Microsoft has underestimated it's popularity of the new Windows XP family license. In an effort to slow piracy within single households, Microsoft has introduced the family license which will allow the user to install multiple copies of it's Windows XP operating system at a slightly discounted price of a $10 savings. Croft also states that the savings reflects the cost of Microsoft not having to produce another disc."
Ooh, Ten Dollars. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ooh, Ten Dollars. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Ooh, Ten Dollars. (Score:4, Insightful)
So What? (Score:5, Insightful)
Let Microsoft double its price for the second installation and make software piracy a capital offense. I assure you that would increase the use of open-source software.
How could this be a hit?? (Score:2, Insightful)
hmm (Score:2, Insightful)
Ooh, Windows XP... (Score:3, Insightful)
Like the article stated, the average geek isn't going to like reactivating XP every time the change 6 components. There certainly could have been a better way to do it. It's just not the preferred OS in anybody's house.
Just my 2.
licensing poorly thought out (Score:5, Insightful)
Just tell the SSL web page how many computers you want to install on, pay $10-$15 for each additional license (not $80), and receive an activation code that you transmit to the central server each time you install on a new machine (and will work up to the number of licenses you bought).
I seems foolish to charge $90 for the upgrade, then another $80 for each additional, since MS only needs to sell one CD per household. With the lower price, MS still makes more money than they would off of a pirated copy, and the customer gets a licensing cost that is only slightly more torturous than the MacOS or Linux.
Regardless of what one thinks of MS' predatory behavior towards other software/hardware makers, it's in any company's interest to carefully think out and plan their consumer sales channel. MS' scheme looks pretty half-baked, indicating that it waqs not well-planned, and that nobody who actually works for the company has ever actually been a customer, and seen what it's like.
Sounds like spin to me - Go Nintendo! (Score:2, Insightful)
PR Stunt? (Score:4, Insightful)
"Wow, Windows XP is so popular, Microsoft ran out of licenses!"
Re:Ooh, Ten Dollars. (Score:1, Insightful)
Importance of Piracy... (Score:3, Insightful)
Not $10 off $99. $10 off $199. (Score:5, Insightful)
Thus, to buy a family pack for two seats you must spend a minimum of $388.
Compare this to buying two over the counter upgrades for $198.
The family license itself, and the so called demand for it, is a pure marketing and PR ploy. It wasn't too hard for sales to be greater than expected, MS didn't expect too many people to actually go for this bugger at all!
Also note that demand isn't *consumer* demand, it's *retailer* demand. No telling how many of these are sitting on back room shelves, unasked for, and unloved, by actual retail customers.
As someone else has already pointed out The Reg has a good article on this.
KFG
Re:Enough of this Economic Model (Score:3, Insightful)
It may be the case that someday all of the people who create digital works get compensated through some means other than per-copy payments (as some do today), but that's going to take a while.
In the mean time, if MS wants to charge money for XP, let them. MS has tried hard to keep you from having any other choices, but thanks to the combined efforts of thousands of people, there are some alternatives.
Comment removed (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Intra-Family Piracy? (Score:2, Insightful)
I understand that MS has every right to license their product however they please. I just personally don't agree with their licensing principles. Being a programmer myself, I choose to license my software under the GNU Public License. However, the company that I work for also has the right to license their products however they please.
Because I dislike how MS licenses their products, I personally choose not to purchase or use their products. This is simply my choice.
I thank you for your perspective. I apologize for pushing my emotions on the facts. The fact remains as you stated that they have the right to license their product however they chose; I have a right to chose not to use their product.