Slashdot Log In
Microsoft patents CSS?
Posted by
Hemos
on Thu Feb 04, 1999 11:09 AM
from the well-i'm-patenting-table-layout-then dept.
from the well-i'm-patenting-table-layout-then dept.
ewhac writes "In the current issue of The Bulletin (an email newsletter, pricey subscription required), it is reported that, in mid-January, Microsoft was awarded patent #5860073 on, "The use of style sheets in an electronic publishing system." The Seybold article casts doubt on the validity of the patent, citing prior art back to the 1960's, and on the competence of the US Patent and Trademark Office for awarding it. The article also calls Microsoft's motives into question for failing to mention this patent application to the World Wide Web Consortium, with whom it has been working for some time to develop a style sheet standard. Thomas Reardon, director of standards at Microsoft, claims that it will offer a "free and reciprocal" license to anyone wishing to use the technology, adding, "These are the most liberal licensing terms out there." (It would seem Reardon is not aware of the GPL.)
"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Microsoft patents CSS?
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 100 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
- specifics... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:31AM
- If you think THIS microsoft patent is fucked up... by Wakko Warner (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @01:50PM
- Copyright on "Where do you want to go today?" by Roblimo (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @02:21PM
- Stupid on the part of the US. by DunbarTheInept (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @02:29PM
- Impeach the USPTO by DaBuzz (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:27AM
- What's the difference? by Joe Mucchiello (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:07PM
- Christ Almighty by Don Negro (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:13AM
- Patent office by Derek (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:28PM
- No big deal. by RobotSlave (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @01:30PM
- What's the difference? by fizbin (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @05:51PM
- Does anyone know anything _about_ Style sheets? by Binary Boy (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @03:53PM
- DONT blame Microsoft! - blame yourselves by Binary Boy (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @04:14PM
- smells like comodity.... by goon (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:32PM
- CSS v. OSS by Jim Hall (Score:1) Friday February 05 1999, @02:53PM
- petition by Kythe (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @02:48PM
- Bastards. by clintp (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:16AM
- I have this vision by unitron (Score:1) Friday February 05 1999, @02:59PM
- One More Thing... by ewhac (Score:2) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:14AM
- What to do about it... by acroyear (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:18PM
- Oh well. Thank god no one uses CSS by GypC (Score:1) Friday February 05 1999, @06:59AM
- ...and thanks for all the fish. by deusx (Score:2) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:29AM
- wrong by bug (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @04:47PM
- Re: Oh well. Thank god no one uses CSS by Zontar The Mindless (Score:1) Friday February 05 1999, @09:31AM
- Patents + Micro$oft = /. flamefest by Cid Highwind (Score:2) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:32AM
- Want more fscking patents? by Baddog Abel (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @03:19PM
- "De-commoditizing protocols", round one by TrentC (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @10:46PM
- What about troff and TeX? by FireDoctor (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:37PM
- Patents are a profit center by FireDoctor (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @07:25PM
- Isn't there anything we can do? by pspeed (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:03PM
- Pray for an angel... by MattCorby (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @05:06PM
- Most liberal license... by RichN (Score:1) Friday February 05 1999, @07:55AM
- This is out of hand!!!! by Panaflex (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:16PM
- re: wrong by Raindog (Score:1) Friday February 05 1999, @05:48AM
- Patent office by Raindog (Score:2) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:47AM
- ahh the uspto by josepha48 (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:56AM
- article on this at wired news by machineryofJoy (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @02:43PM
- The tip of the iceberg... by Your own stupidity (Score:2) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:48AM
- Is the concept of Linux patented? by typo (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @05:23PM
- Isn't there anything we can do? by Todd Knarr (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:30PM
- I remember using those in 1992 by Visoblast (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @11:41AM
- Don't Like the Patent & Trademark Office? by LHOOQtius ov Borg (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @02:04PM
- Patent bonus plan... by dedalus (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:38PM
- Come on .... by ihxo (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @12:58PM
- Who said M$ is not innovative by ihxo (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @07:27PM
- Another example of business getting out of hand by Dissenter (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @04:32PM
- Walking with huge balls. by Dissenter (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @04:45PM
- "reciprocal" license = leverage ? by SigmaZero (Score:1) Friday February 05 1999, @06:56AM
- CSS is a core technology in MS Office 2000 by dominiqued (Score:1) Wednesday February 10 1999, @01:20AM
- Liberal licensing terms by El (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @03:41PM
- Patents and business models by El (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @03:45PM
- "Super Cruise Bracket" by bitwize (Score:1) Thursday February 04 1999, @01:44PM
- 49 replies beneath your current threshold.
