Slashdot Log In
Bloggers' Plagiarism Scientifically Proven
Posted by
michael
on Fri Mar 05, 2004 10:25 AM
from the we-prefer-to-say-'borrow' dept.
from the we-prefer-to-say-'borrow' dept.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Bloggers' Plagiarism Scientifically Proven
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 466 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
duh. (Score:5, Funny)
funny and insightful! (Score:4, Interesting)
but it's my idea...
Re:funny and insightful! (Score:4, Funny)
Your Grandfather plagiarized that from the author of Ecclesiastes. [crosswalk.com]
How fitting ...
Re:funny and insightful! (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://prawnworks.com/girlish)
Giving into the "nothing new under the sun" just means that if there is, it won't be from you.
It's not "stealing" (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.turnstyle.com/)
It's what Open Source is all about (Score:4, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday September 25, @09:39AM)
Re:It's what Open Source is all about (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.turnstyle.com/)
From my own experience, I've been working on my MP3 juke/server software Andromeda [turnstyle.com] since about 1999. A few years later some guy came up with a GPL'd app Zina (Zina is not Andromeda, which he describes: "It is similar to Andromeda, but released under the GNU General Public License"). And, in turn, I've seen others with forked versions of Zina.
So, I've certainly seen OS projects following a proprietary work, BUT I've also seen proprietary projects that follow other proprietary projects too.
Most ideas are part of a flow, and I don't think that I would characterize OS as any more or less derivative than proprietary work -- except when it comes to the endless GPL forking.
IMHO, the main problem with OS is that the coders aren't getting paid.
I have some ideas (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I have some ideas (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://dotfuturemanifesto.blogspot.com/)
The idea that copying is bad is a recent one. Prior to the industrial revolution the highest form of the craftsman's art was often considered to be the ability to create perfect copies of other people's work. Innovation is a relatively new idea. If you go to recently industrialized countries the bias for originality is often absent.
Several people have the same idea all the time. Whit Diffie was not the first to think up public key cryptography, but nobody claims he copied it off Cocks at GCHQ. I often take apart other people's schemes and find they have had ideas that are similar to my own.
Invention is not just originality, it is also reuse of existing ideas, improving where necessary and useful. In many case it is the circumstances that lead to the result.
Take a look at the Cagle cartoons on Slate. They have all the editorial cartoons from 40 odd papers across the country. The number of times that the same cartoon idea appears again and again is uncanny. These people might be copying to a small extent, but it simply isn't possible for them to all come out with the same idea in such a short time.
I am probably not the only person who thinks that the latest '24x7' hunt for Bin Laden is something we should have been doing for the past two years. If you read the blogs you will find page after page of people outraged that the start of the hunt for Bin Laden seems to have been timed to coincide with the first Bush election ads. I doubt many of them have seen my slashdot .sig. Clearly much of this is independent thought.
Blogs are an entertainment and a political movement. They are not academic journals or treatises. Not that there is much of importance or originality in the academic litterature. Sure people lift ideas but thats why most people are putting them out there.
For years people have been asking if I am angry that Microsoft has copied many of my ideas. Oddly enough nobody has ever asked me if I minded other people copying my ideas (and passing them off as their own which Microsoft has never done), but that is another story. The fact is that I want people to use my ideas, they are useless unless they are put into action. Microsoft use a lot of my ideas because I spend a lot of time persuading them to use them. My principal complaint about Netscape is that they just shut themselves off from the Web community, they got the idea that they were the only people who had the good ideas.
Ideas are easy (Score:4, Interesting)
Which is why patents should only be granted the demonstration of a working example...
Re:It's not "stealing" (Score:5, Funny)
straw men, yay! (Score:5, Informative)
I spoke with Lada Adamic Wednesday, and she gave a talk on this and several other of her research directions. They are not out to determine whether people plagiarize. They are interested in information flow within complex networks. That is to say, if I want to find good information, where should I look? The typical answer has been "those who agglomerate".
It is no surprise to the HP group or anyone that some information sources are simply aggregating agents. But if your area of research is information flow in complex networks, this type of study contains many insights. For example, a common question is "what information nodes are important?". This study seeks to look beyond the naive answer "high-degree nodes" and attribute some importance, in an informational sense, to lower-degree nodes that act as sources for the network.
The iRank scheme mentioned several times in the article, which I read, demonstrates this thrust. A scheme like PageRank will almost always rank most highly the aggregates, because they are highest-degree in terms of backlinks. But who is to say that such a ranking is optimal? If you care about quickly scanning much information, it probably is. But if you care about seeking more detailed or perhaps more well-informed sources of information on a topic, iRank may well be a closer-to-optimal scheme.
The comments regarding this story have been a straw man excercise if i've ever seen one on Slashdot. HP doesn't spend its research money to find out that some information sources gather information from many others and distribute it widely. It does spend its money to find out more about how complex networks operate and how the flow of information can be analyzed and exploited to improve query responses in those networks.
Bad writers plagiarize? (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Thursday September 28 2006, @01:08PM)
In other news, sixth-graders routinely hand in articles copied verbatim from the World Book Encylopedia as "research papers".
Re:Bad writers plagiarize? (Score:5, Funny)
wait (Score:4, Interesting)
Few Original Ideas (Score:5, Insightful)
I've found that there are very few original thoughts or ideas, and very few people who come up with them. It isn't a matter of plagerism. It's just that there are only so many viable ideas out there. And the more that are already taken, the harder it is to come up with a new one. If you reach too far just to have an original thought, then you end up a wacko.
It isn't just bloggers.
Re:Few Original Ideas (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Few Original Ideas (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Sunday November 06 2005, @05:24PM)
If memory serves, a 19th century sociologist by the name of "Darde" posited that out of 100 people, 1 is truly creative and the remaining 99 are echoic.
The research in question suggests the same. And so does the nature of television.
Re:Few Original Ideas (Score:5, Funny)
So I guess we can rule you out of the 1% too?
(Sorry, couldn't resist.) ;-)
Re:Few Original Ideas (Score:4, Informative)
Actually I mostly agree. Except I think everybody is at least slightly original, just to different degrees. Even Einstein's work wasn't a total discontinuity out of the blue.
I like to rank originality, at least in science, by the number of years I guess it would have taken for the thing to be invented anyways, if the original inventor had not. The TV, for instance, was a virtual tie among several people.
Back in the dark ages there weren't too many scientists and it was relatively easy to move a discovery up by 100 years IMHO. Nowadays so many people are working every problem that it's harder to jump ahead even by 1-2 years.
Re:Few Original Ideas (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.sonicevolver.com/)
Right. It's also basic human nature. You know how there are some people who have great personalities, who speak like it is really them talking, who, while they are almost certainly not 100% original, still give that impression? Then, there are people who seem to have half a personality, who parrot excessively, who, when you're having a conversation with them, they keep picking up words you use and throwing them back at you, and you notice because it's mildly odd. Or maybe you overhear them repeating an idea that you know you formulated, but they're repeating it to somebody else and taking the credit.
It seems to me that this article is merely pointing out that a lot of people are like the latter. I'm also not surprised to find lots of these types of people among bloggers, since so many are overt attention ho's, and attention ho's are often notorious "borrowers" of other people's personalities.
(Mind, I'm not saying this of all bloggers, as I have found plenty of interesting, well-written, informative, and entertaining blogs. You know the kind I'm talking about.)
Re:Few Original Ideas (Score:5, Funny)
(https://addons.mozil...&application=firefox)
Interesting, as I've found that there are very few original thoughts or ideas, and very few people who come up with them. It isn't a matter of plagerism. It's just that there are only so many viable ideas out there. And the more that are already taken, the harder it is to come up with a new one. If you reach too far just to have an original thought, then you end up a wacko.
Bloggers (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.ckwop.me.uk/)
I think it's the fact that the more popular bloggers put their ideas across in a clearer way than the less know bloggers..
it's not the idea that's important.. it's how you present it.
Simon.
Aggregators (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://seenonslash.com/ | Last Journal: Friday May 11 2007, @04:02PM)
Re:Bloggers (Score:5, Informative)
Look! I'm linking to a blog in a discussion about blogs!
Isn't that ironic [reference.com]?
No, in fact it is not.
look no further (Score:5, Funny)
Otherwise know as the 'Slashdupe' syndrome. One site is even know for it's inability to keep stories original within a 24 hour period.
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.ciphergoth.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday January 14 2007, @06:32AM)
Wired [wired.com] has up a story [wired.com] about HP, as part of a larger drive to figure out how ideas ideas 'infect' large groups of people, scientifically proving what most people already knew: bloggers steal [hp.com] their ideas from other bloggers.
Well that explains that! (Score:3, Funny)
/hates whiny teenage blogs
Steal? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yes, horrible plagiarism! (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://futuregirl.livejournal.com/)
You don't say!
I suppose we're going to start burning Shakespeare's works because they were blatantly stolen from other writers, right?
Idea modification and adaptation is not plagiarism - much of human progress in the arts has happened because of this phenomenon, and the internet neither started nor ended it.
Re:Yes, horrible plagiarism! (Score:4, Insightful)
computers would be nothing like they are today (nor as cheap as) if it wasnt for "stealing" and "plagiarism" My god, Compaq stile IBM's IP and shout be punished severly! OMG! Texas Instruments STOLE the idea of a processor from Intel!
today too many people are worrying about how to make the most money with the least effort..
How about being proud of the fact that your idea is so good that everyone want's to copy it? and use that supposedly superior brain to tink up another one...
that is why every "invention" I come up with I market the hell out of until I see copies show up on the market, then simply switch to something else after selling the rights cheaply to one of the copycats. (no I wont tell any of you what items I invented, many are gizmos for hunters and camping/hiking)
The louder someone whines about stolen
So... (Score:4, Insightful)
Next Question... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.marotti.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 15 2007, @01:48PM)
If so, its quite well known it links to copyrightten articles all the time.
Obviously (Score:5, Funny)
with four-hundred and eighty-nine quintillion-zillion blogs, how many did they think were going to be original?
Generally stealing ideas is good for growth (Score:5, Interesting)
Depends really (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.cookstour.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday August 18 2001, @06:40AM)
I guess in this case they're referring to bloggers as people who blog lots of links. Maybe they're the majority of bloggers, but they're not the majority of *interesting* bloggers (imho!)
That's not just blogs... (Score:5, Insightful)
Lobachevski (Score:5, Funny)
(http://foo.ewu.edu/ | Last Journal: Monday June 18, @12:43PM)
Let no one else's work evade your eyes,
Remember why the good Lord made your eyes,
So don't shade your eyes,
But plagiarize, plagiarize, plagiarize -
Only be sure always to call it, pliz, 'research'.
Shamelessly researched from a Tom Lehrer song.
Self-Pleasure Circuit (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 06 2004, @04:52PM)
I'm just suprised that this whole fad has lasted this long.
Let's be realistic here. The scripting ability necessary to create a weblog is next to nil. It's not that amazing of a thing. It's a nice format, I'll give you that, but it doesn't deserve the hype. It's just about time that people start noticing this and pointing out the vapidity in the 'blogging scene'.
Re:Self-Pleasure Circuit (Score:5, Insightful)
And as far as your comment on the simplicity of the scripting required, that's just snobbery. I'll bet your design and scripting skills are miles further ahead than those of most bloggers, but so what? How is that relevant?
There is vapidity everywhere these days from TV, to movies, to music, even to the bloody news! Something as simple and community oriented as a blog does not deserve to be passed off as insignificant and vapid. The content is not necessarily as important as the medium. Blogs are part of our modern oral tradition, and from a sociological standpoint they're extremely relevant and important media.
Re:Self-Pleasure Circuit (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Monday April 26 2004, @01:10AM)
Your point being? People don't read blogs because they're hard to set up: they read them because they (presumably) find the writer interesting.
So? (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Monday December 20 2004, @01:32PM)
Just yesterday I heard a radio news story about how thousands of people are dying from something or other every year. When I looked into the data deeper, it was an estimate (read: ideologically motivated wild ass guess) by some political group, and had no actual science behind it whatsoever. But it was still just reported without any thought because the group issued a press release.
Sounds more like transient social consciousness (Score:5, Funny)
OK, I actually read the article and this doesn't sound like "stealing" at all to me. Granted we'd need to see the underlying blogs and topics in question, but let's face it - social awareness of various topics ebb and flow.
Those of you who follow U.S. media may recall "The Summer of the Shark". There was no peak in shark attacks that year. In fact I think it was a below-average year. It just became the socially-focused topic.
Then there's the "everything's now in place" effect. Competing teams coming up with similar vaccines at the same time. Or manned flight.
Just part of the Great Filtered Aquifer of the human experience.
Of course it may well be that humans are just a bunch of damn thieving cheaters.
Blog tracking services (Score:4, Interesting)
Routine tracking of blatant, unacknowledged copying of other's blogs would certainly separate the poseurs from the thinkers. Tracking the provenence of ideas would also reduce the truth-by-repetition problem on the internet wherein an erroneous fact looks widely accepted due to mere duplication.
But... (Score:3, Funny)
CNN? FoxNews? NYTimes? (Score:5, Insightful)
(