I would imagine it's a "one step up the chain" problem. Basically, if facial recognition is utilized to the fullest, without your own consent, Meta will have the option of tagging spottings for you by address, by map, by street, by landmarks, or whatever. So, if someone is stalking you, they don't even necessarily need to own a pair of the glasses. They can just check to see where you've been tagged recently and head out to find you.

Think they're beyond that type of thing? Think about how many photos you've been tagged in that were uploaded without your consent from "friends" that just upload every picture. It's not that far of a stretch.

To get the public to support X, the story goes "hated people hate x!" I've seen it MUCH more recently lately. The inverse also works. Give up your teamism.

Our management team are currently busy having AI write their single sentence reports into giant sprawling messes that the next up the chain uses another AI to summarize as a single sentence that may or may not resemble the original single sentence. They're already automating the main functions of their jobs, and they aren't bright enough to realize that's what they're doing. And all you need to decide what the product is is a sales manager and a marketing manager. The people that know the technical details don't get any say even now, so no need to worry about them getting let go as AI can bring the fantasies to life for the sales and marketing teams. Gonna be amazing when the only people left with jobs are the lowest dregs of humanity, marking, sales, and advertising. I suppose sprinkle a few lawyers in there just to keep it deep in the mud. Glorious future we've got coming.

Shooting at Sam Altman over the state of current AI is like shooting at Ronald McDonald because you got a bad cheeseburger. It's not gonna change anything, but I suppose you may get a little Warhol effect fame.

Do you even America? Sell guns to both sides, for crying out loud. You're suggestion leaves half the profit potential laying right there in plain sight.,/p>

Perfect! We can automate aggravating customers for no reason. The future is amazing.

You are an idiot who probably votes for the uniparty. 70% of America is infested with the teamism that keeps the authoritarian corporatists at the top of the food chain and elevates them every year.

Dude, the next model is gonna be so scary that they won't even let THEMSELVES use it.

Maybe they used middle-out compression. Richard Hendricks is gonna sue somebody.

I wonder if you did a slowly accelerating transfer if it would just be shrugged off as a natural escalation of something. What, wouldn't know, but folks tend to get really stupid when something starts at a trickle and builds slowly over time.

Combined with entries for whichever of the various firewall tools you may be using for the "one click to block" part. People like their visual tools. I'd prefer the command line myself, but I won't complain too much about somebody coming to Linux and creating their own utility right off the bat. Seems very in the right frame of mind at least.

Did you not even read the summary? If all tech companies did this instead of finding new and interesting ways to fuck up society, I'd be all for it. Honeypot those big thinkers into endurance competitions of stupidity? Hell yeah. This idea has potential.

It's just Spinal Tap for corporate types.

That documentary was a laugh a minute. This one I'd probably only be able to handle five minutes at a time lest I go into cardiac arrest from the laughter.

FINALLY! A use for all those VR headsets.