Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Start menu usage dropped in lieu of what? (Score 2) 251

by war4peace (#48027263) Attached to: Microsoft's Asimov System To Monitor Users' Machines In Real Time

I got a bit smarter and here's how I set up my desktop.

I have two folders created on my Desktop, one called "Software" and another called "Games". All software shortcuts go into the former, and all games shortcuts go into the latter. I then create two toolbars on my taskbar which point to those two folders, basically obtaining a slimmed down start menu which works the same way but doesn't have all the extra shit I don't need (e.g. Uninstall shortcuts, heinous list of subfolders, etc). Most used applications are also pinned to Taskbar.

So I am two clicks away from any application/game in my computer, all without having to use the Start Menu. With Win8, I actually didn't miss the start menu, I missed the taskbar and all the functionality it offered. Yes, I know it exists, but with the Windows button acting differently depending on which applications you have started and the need to press Alt+F4 to make sure an application is closed, it was diminishing my performance.

Comment: Re:Hmmm ... (Score 1) 179

by war4peace (#48001917) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Is Reporting Still Relevant?

Please don't open that particular can of worms :)
The reasons why some people go through this effort of manually putting together reports is unreasonable management demands.
They want powerpoint slides in that specific format, using those specific fonts, having that specific logo in that specific place, using data sources which are not connected to each other, and God forbid if you put that graph 2 millimeters to the right. It would be the end of the world.

I can create reports really quickly, but they don't satisfy specific constraints, so results need to be exported and babysat to appease the powers that be. Formatting it accordingly is a PITA and no automated reporting can do the job.

Not to mention data sources which are not integrated for plenty of reasons:
- someone doesn't want to grant access to their data source for automation ("only PDF outputs, no DB access!")
- someone felt like using a DB was "too difficult" so they have spreadsheets for their data
- someone has an ancient, non-standard spaghetti code script set up and don't feel like leaving the 80s.

Sprinkle all that with political games that happen between teams and groups and you're proper fucked.

Comment: Re:Hmmm ... (Score 1) 179

by war4peace (#48001855) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Is Reporting Still Relevant?

Agreed with everything you said.
I guess I was focusing more on the idea of online reporting versus document-based reporting. A PDF export is something that's static and quickly slips into obsolescence, also it's an uncontrolled document which might or might not be relevant a day, a week or a month from now. I had plenty discussions with people who used to export reports to PDF and challenge the online reporting after a couple months when, due to inherent changes in the DB data, the online report would no longer exactly match the PDF export they had.

Comment: Re:Hmmm ... (Score 1) 179

by war4peace (#47996929) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Is Reporting Still Relevant?

I usually don't respond to ACs but you weren't trolling so there goes:
The complexity involved when handling reporting for a large(r) organization prohibits full automation. There will be groups which need different inputs and the same type of outputs, the simplest example being regions (EMEA, APAC, AMER and their subdivisions). Add hierarchy-based groups on top of that and everything turns into a nightmare to manage and automate. The most optimized solution would be to build a single report with input variables, where each group would use to enter their own shit and the report would crap out the pies and barcharts and whatnot, you know, the stuff everybody loves.
Without user-facing input variables (e.g. pick yer timeframe, choose thy region(s)) I would need to manage not 500+, but 5000+ reports. Kind of a bit too much for ONE FUCKING MAN.

Yes I have a powerful scheduling solution, with agents, configurable outputs and so forth, but those only go so far. Yes, I can even automate most of those variables (e.g. group A has variables x, y, z etc) but then a shitload of people would crash on my head asking for "a small change" which turns automation into manual workload and we're back to square one.

I taught them to go to $this_url and select $these_values and bookmark their selection, said "NO" to "can't you send it to me every week?" and done deal. If they cease visiting the reports after running them twice, that's not my problem, it's theirs.

If you're not careful, you're going to catch something.

Working...