I remember being absolutely burnt out on school by the time I reached grade 7 or 8. I started out enjoying learning. In fact, I was the kid who won the contest at our public library over the summer, twice in a row, for reading the most books on my own. I was also "that kid" who really got into doing those science fair projects and having one go on to some sort of regional finals.

I think what really started ruining things for me was the combination of way too much homework and too many classes (by high school, at least) where teachers felt it necessary to fill 4 chalkboards full of notes each day that we had to copy in our notebooks, as study material for their quizzes and exams. Oh, and of course, we still had to read a chapter or two of the provided hard-cover textbook.

I mean, there are SO many truly entertaining stories one can tell about history (YouTube is chock-full of them!), and yet - almost every History teacher I had in school insisted on dry/dull spewing of names, dates and places that had to be copied down, memorized, and spit back. And I'll admit math was always a struggle for me. I just never reached a point where I found any of it "enjoyable". But it never helped me that my math teachers always seemed to cover a steady "topic per day" without much care if we understood one of them or not. Everything built on everything else though, so as soon as I got lost with one or two items, it became a downward spiral. All they could suggest is, "Get tutoring!" ... and frankly? That's the LAST thing a school age kid/teen wants to hear when they've got so much of their waking life already occupied with the school day + hours of homework in the evening.I finally got a really good math teacher in college one year, who made a lot of it make sense for me. But it was one of those remedial classes that I think worked for me because she only taught us in a small group and made sure each of us understood each topic. I was always much better with reading and writing, but even a few of the English Lit. type courses I had were FAR more painful than they should have been. I mean, forcing us to read a specific novel to answer quiz questions on it and report on it later is counter to the way any sane person enjoys reading. (Who goes to a book store and has the clerk shove a book in their face - saying you must buy and read this one now?) Why couldn't they have a selection of books about different topics to choose from?

I dunno.... I guess I can see how AI could cause the same kind of "mental laziness" a calculator does vs learning to do a problem by hand? But calculator results are absolutes. AI makes mistakes and often requires creative re-wording of questions and playing with adding rules/restrictions to the output. If it's simply taught that it has to be used only as a tool, and one with limitations? It shouldn't stop the curious from wanting to learn. I wonder how much of that was already crushed by the system?

But that *does* require that you believe that they are honest to you about their future actions...and that they won't change their mind later.

Pirates were often hanged by the same countries that issued them letters of marque.

Why do you believe what they say when they continually misrepresent things. I'd say "lie", but that implies they know what they're doing.

Key difference: You're paying a lot of money for that useless first semester.

I would be supremely pissed to fork over $40k just to get a "pass" in Freshman-101.

If U-M is doing the now-common waste of a first semester packed with "Freshman 101" bullshit, I would agree with you.

If students are taking real classes, then no, I'd call that the second most important semester (with only the very last one mattering more). Why? Because that's when half the incoming class realizes they are wildly unprepared for college and either pursues an exciting career in fast food, or for those only slightly overwhelmed, switches to a 2-year structured a lot more like an advanced version of highschool.

Not everyone should be going to college, that is the real problem here. There's nothing new under the sun, dumb kids exist and they become dumb adults.

You're right that wasn't an exhaustive list - I'm personally a counterexample to my own comment in that I'm a mere peon of a coder... Who is often tapped to assist with M&A, major vendor changes, and onboarding new customers (in the B2B sense). I do have privileged information that would be illegal to trade on.

But this is Slashdot, not Investopedia. The "tl;dr" is, if you have actionable insider information, you're not merely guessing, you damned well know it and almost certainly signed an NDA specifically covering what you can and can't do with that information.

Congress "did not intend" to legalize straight-up gambling nationwide through what amounts to a semantic loophole. There is absolutely no doubt about that, on any side of this discussion (including the CFTC).

It's funny - Online discussions among (real) investors often worry about, and frequently caution each other about insider trading. The reality is, insider trading isn't applicable to the vast majority of us. Unless you're a C-level employee, specifically working in M&A, or maybe as the lead on a truly revolutionary new product (no, your company's Facebook wannabe or thinly disguised open source ripoff ain't it) - You have no insider information to trade on. Sincere belief that your employer's cool new toys are going to change the world ain't it - every company has cool new toys in the pipeline, and most of them are going to flop or at best be just another branded widget.

Thanks to Kalshi and Polymarket, congrats, every single one of us can now have truly actionable insider information. And that's not good, because as the past year has shown repeatedly, the average Joe is more than willing to use that information and has zero comprehension of securities regulations.

And to be clear, I have no substantial objection to gambling. This sham is something else entirely, however, and that something is a naked power grab.

If I read that summary correctly, this will only ever be usable to clean small amounts of stuff in a closed container. It's not going to work for, say, the Great Pacific Garbage Patch.

That's what it meant ever since RUR. I'll grant that PR people keep spinning different meanings for it though.

In order: no, no, no, no, yes, no.

The lone "yes" is for illegally obtained. Otherwise you're effectively banning the default situation for every smartphone on the market today.

More to the point, Meta's glasses are in no way unique - And make no mistake, I loathe all things Meta as much as the rest of you. Unmodified, they're no different than using any other camera in public (including dozens of competing smart / camera glasses). Even modified - I hate to break it to you all, but go to Amazon and search for hidden / spy / nanny cams. I get nearly a thousand results and that's from a major, primarily law-abiding (if we don't count labor and competition) online store. If you go to a site actively specializing in spy cams, you can find even more, smaller, and creepier form factors beyond your wildest imagination.

There is, bluntly, zero technical difference between the nannycam in my kitchen smoke detector, and a spycam in your bedroom or a public bathroom. Any meaningful legal solutions here therefore must focus on intent (primarily in production and, secondarily, consumption). Or, as in this FP, we can pretend spanking Meta changes any of what I've just described.

To be clear, I'm not at all defending the creeps or Meta in general. Fuck 'em, and fuck 'em hard. But let's not lump the 99.9% of well-meaning and law-abiding users of recording technology in with the actual criminals.

I, for one, doubt we'll see air traffic control replaced by AI any time soon. The big reason is accountability. If one air traffic controller completely screws things up and causes a plane crash -- that person can be singled out, terminated, and things return to normal. If the AI they replaced the human workers with screws up and causes a plane crash? Now you're talking about years of ongoing investigation, arguments/debates and pressure to bring the human workers back.

My own experience using Reddit is that it's really a mixed bag when it comes to forum moderation.
On some of the forums, moderators seem to do their due diligence and people receive warnings before outright bans, with explanations of why they were warned.

In others, you just get a sudden permanent ban, with nobody ever replying if you ask for an explanation.

For example, I work for a company that uses "Docuware", a fairly expensive (and somewhat obscure) document management software package. We paid to migrate our on-site server to their cloud-based solution a while back, but during that process, our support contract expired for the on-site version. We were assured we didn't need to spend the money renewing it just to get help finishing the migration. But we ran into some issues in the meantime (largely because we had to hold off on cutting over fully to the cloud, to retain compatibility with an outside vendor we shared some of the data with). I discovered Reddit had a Docuware subreddit (woo!), and asked a couple questions in there. I got a public reply from a guy in a foreign country who promised he could assist me. But then, he private messaged me, hitting me up for some large hourly fee. In other words, he was just looking for targets to sell his services but pretending he was just another helpful user in the public forum.

Shortly after I sent him a private reply thanking him but declining his services? I was permanently banned from the subreddit. No explanation... nothing. Looks like it was really just set up for Docuware consultants to make a few bucks.

Please modify this to:
"""Whenever a "discovery" is announced it's best to wait for verification before popping champagne corks."""

If there isn't independent verification then it's poor policy to believe. It may also be poor policy to disbelieve.

That trick works even on accounts with a private profile.

Not to mention third-party search engines couldn't care less about how a profile is set. Though admittedly, Reddit is doing its best to commit suicide - in yet another way - by trying to block search engines except their AI "partners".

Actually, I had measles twice before there was a vaccine. There are two different kinds of measles, but presumably the vaccine covers both.