Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Trust the World's Fastest VPN with Your Internet Security & Freedom - A Lifetime Subscription of PureVPN at 88% off. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:bitwise math (Score 1) 611

Compilers aren't AI, they can do any 'trick' the compiler writer knows

There is an entire class of optimizations that the programmer can make but the compiler can't because the programmer understands things about the program that aren't expressed in the source code. For example, maybe the programmer knows that in his case the shift really is equivalent to the divide because he knows the range of the possible inputs, but he can't tell the compiler that unless he's programming in Ada.

Comment Re:Isn't this illegal? (Score 1) 325

ordinary Democrats generally preferred her. If you can't get the left of American center voters to support a so-called socialist

That is an idiotic argument, and here's why: there is almost certainly not a single, solitary "ordinary Democrat" who would have voted for Trump over Sanders. On the other hand, there were many people for whom Clinton's out-of-touch elitist platform (e.g. support for the TPP) made her unacceptable. This includes, crucially, historically-Democratic union workers in exactly the few Midwestern states that handed Trump the victory. Sanders would have swung those people easily.

Comment Re:Isn't this illegal? (Score 1) 325

Bernie was an outsider not a lifelong member of the party.

Who gives a shit?

The Democrats (the party not the people who vote democrat - annoying how I have to spell everything out) would see any win by him as a loss.

More of a loss than electing FUCKING TRUMP?

Let me spell this out very clearly, since Democratic partisans are apparently utter morons: even though Sanders wasn't a loyal apparatchik of the DNC political machine, they would have still been a fuck-ton better off having Sanders sit there vetoing all the alt-right bullshit the Republican-supermajority Congress will be shoving through for the next four years, instead of having Trump sit there signing it into goddamn motherfucking LAW!

Comment Re:Isn't this illegal? (Score 3, Informative) 325

On a related note, the White House FOIA page is currently unavailable. So much for requesting transcripts of all Trump Administration business done over Confide (just for shits and giggles since there's no chance they'd, you know, comply with the law or anything).

Comment Re:He didn't steal the data, they still have it (Score 1) 156

Well, they are secrets, which are only valuable if not shared.

One can make a similar argument about the commercial value of copyrighted material.

On the contrary, one can make the opposite argument about copyrighted material: I say it becomes more valuable to society as a whole (as opposed to any particular entity in it) the more it gets shared.

Comment Re: Well, damn (Score 1, Interesting) 335

I mean, what exactly is wrong with our elected American leaders saying they are going to put forth and defend American interests first and foremost when dealing with the rest of the world?

If that's all it meant, it wouldn't be a problem. But it's actually a dog-whistle for fascism, and you fucking know it.

Was it about the same time it seems it became just plain wrong to be born a white male?

From one white male to another: fuck off with your bullshit feigned victimhood. It's not helping anything, least of all other white males!

Comment Re:Pro Shareholder Agenda (Score 1) 182

Corporations should focus on their employees and their customers, not shareholders.

Corporations should act in the public interest. Otherwise there is literally no reason for them to exist.

Remember, the Constitution affirms the right to assemble, but it does not affirm some imaginary right to do so and then demand special legal treatment to limit liability!

Comment Re:As much as it pains me to take M$'s side . . . (Score 1) 183

. . . not unlike their somewhat heavy-handed tactics in pushing Windows 10 out (and pushing out updates), this is actually Microsoft's best answer to the perception that their product is buggy and exploit-prone.

Who gives a shit? I'll take buggy and exploit prone over treating the owner of the goddamn computer as a hostile enemy and/or a slave to be exploited any day!

Any company who decides their copyright should overrule the device owner's actual property rights must be destroyed for the good of society.

Comment Re:Microsoft is making Steam worse? (Score 2) 183

Why won't Valve work to make it better?

Because it would be AGAINST THE LAW. If Microsoft implemented DRM to disallow running non-"approved" programs and didn't "approve" Steam, Valve would have to break the DRM to make it work. Breaking DRM is a felony.

The DMCA and CFAA are assaults on the right to own property itself, because they subjugate the owner (of the computer)'s wishes to that of the copyright holder.

Slashdot Top Deals

Blinding speed can compensate for a lot of deficiencies. -- David Nichols

Working...