Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Cheap, If... (Score 1) 30

If the argument can be proved that they ruined the minds of an entire generation using a massive AI/Big Data model running at n terraflops by deliberately addicting children during the crucial neuronal pruning period of their lives, that is at a minimum going to cost the society tens of trillions of dollars and restitution would be far more than the proposed fines.

Nobody gets a second chance at that pruning stage, at least in this lifetime.

Their profits may be far lower than the damage they caused, but that characteristic is always true of parasitic entities.

This is basically the whole point of the Island of Pleasure warning in Pinocchio.

It remains to be seen what can be proved in Courts but the DSM-6 won't be kind to their arguments as outlined in TFS.

Comment Re:More people should probably feel worse... (Score 1) 36

It's not really a catch-22, since there's no need for it to be the same people regulating how much lying you can do about prices and producing goods and services.

It's also not really a catch-22 since, if it weren't for the tolerance of grotesque levels of regulatory capture, any 'capitalist' regulator would take ensuring high quality price signals really seriously.

The part that should upset people is that the 'capitalists' are so far into bed with actively anti-market rent seekers that you can't rely on them to stand up for honest price signals, contract law that isn't so lopsided as to be basically a joke, and so on.

Comment Re:Cool! (Score 3, Interesting) 31

The idea is probably from 1950's comic books but the tech seems brand new since they don't need any landing legs and use a net-on-frame architecture.

People should pay attention because they didn't have orbital technology thirty years ago and now they have a space station, reusable rockets, and are about to have a Moon base.

And possibly ultra-long flighttime 'drones' that can fly over Picatinny Arsenal unimpeded; that much is uncertain. We have no explanation for their energy budget (at least white-world).

Having a country run by engineers rather than professional thieves who hire engineers to justify pillage has certain advantages (and disadvantages).

Let's not get too overconfident.

Comment And the obvious difference... (Score 0) 107

If you are going to anthropomorphize a tool enough to call it "AI" I suppose that it isn't entirely unreasonable to suspect that it might "reflect CCP ideology and values"; but fretting along that line seems to either be ignoring or deliberately obfuscating the difference between running a model and suckling on someone's black-box API.

A local bot can hurt you to the degree that you trust it to actually work; but a remote vendor can(and, given the competitive scramble for training data, almost certainly wants to and will try to to the degree they can get away with it) hurt you both to the degree that you trust it to actually work and to the degree that it can exploit the data and process information you are exfiltrating to them. This aspect is outright advertised as a virtue to some extent(when facebook is going on about how the 'AI' that 'knows you better' will be more useful; or one of the 'foundation model' vendors is promising your boss that, for real this time, improvements will allow next year's digital transformation to still work after it gets rid of you); but there's no reason to believe that it stops there: if the potential of 'AI' is half as interesting as they claim it is why would you expect that your vendor will just sit there obligingly renting you synthetic programmers or virtual back-office functions forever when they could just eat you whole?

For about 2 American money pits racing toward IPOs the chinese models are the scary pirate version that makes their value proposition look even worse than it does by itself; but for literally everyone else it's using the fancy, respectable, foundation model guys that is the glorious future of short-sighted outsourcing; and there's not much reason to expect any of them to like it for reasons beyond stupidity or desperation.

Comment How curious. (Score 2) 121

I realize that it's all about keeping the corporate sponsors happy; but I'm perpetually a bit puzzled by how the 'culture war' stuff never seems to result in any related action on things like food contamination (outside of a few 'crunchy'/'natural' influencers who make some social media noise but are essentially irrelevant from a regulatory perspective).

If one were looking for something remotely resembling intellectual coherence wouldn't the legality of persistent compounds that sure do seem to make endocrinologists nervous in food really get the people who are loudly concerned about biological gender or white birth rates motivated? However much you overestimate the ability of liberal propagandists surely you would take good, old-fashioned, chemical effects on the endocrine system even more seriously?

Comment I'm sure. (Score 1) 71

It certainly is good that any of the properties of an LED that you can measure cheaply and reliably enough to get away with using in consumer electronics are 100% distinct from those of other components or precisely the same LED covered with opaque epoxy.

Just detecting that there's now an open circuit where a diode should be would be fairly trivial and cover the cruder drilling cases; but this will be cosmetic at best against any moderately motivated tampering.

Comment Re:Banks responsible in part (Score 1) 54

Banking industry is sometimes really stupid and oblivious, I received dozens of scam emails asking me to urgently install the "Security App" to unlock my bank accounts. It took a few months, before my bank decided to create an app to securely access my bank account. You'll never guess, what they called that app.

Paypal change of ToS would also be an example of frequent emails, that I had to research before actually deeming them legit.

Comment Re:I blame the government ... (Score 1) 54

tariffs against violating countries

Goddamit. Trump has been President for 17 months and people still don't seem to understand that a tariff is a tax paid by Americans.

Tariffs are a tax, if you apply them across the board. If you apply them highly targeted, they are an easily avoidable tax for all Americans, yet an economic hit on the country trying to benefit from scams.

If the scammers are in Bulgaria and an American company is buying specialized industrial equipment from Bulgaria, then that American company pays the tariff. You are in effect punishing that American company because of scammers in Bulgaria.

If Bulgaria hosts these scammers, the USA are well within their right to lean on EU to clean up their back yard. Also, Bulgaria wouldn't last long in a direct economic confrontation with the USA, so these tariffs wouldn't have to last long.

To make a long story short: if you apply tariffs and sanctions smartly, they are very impactful and effective. If you do it like DT47, then they're like a tax.

Comment Re: How many beers? A LOT (Score 1) 68

There are European countries with a lager tradition, and those who prefer ales. The lager drinkers vastly outdrink the ale drinkers, and all recent beer converts in Southern Europe also drink lager. There's a hipster circle trying to make IPA palatable, but that's 1. new and 2. not that big in volume.

And yes, I did experience lager beer with flavored hops e.g. at Gordon Biersch in Palo Alto, which was a cool place to be while it lasted. They were very proud of their flavored hops and happily presented them to us "look how good" during a guided tour through their brewery. And yes, I do agree with you, that a flavored lager is a shame.

While the Americans in our group insisted, that Oregon Pale Ale was very good, in fact at least as good as any decent lager beer, the profound quantity difference of beer consumed at happy hours (compared between a keg Pale Ale vs. a keg of Spaten beer from Munich) told a vastly different story.

Comment Re: How many beers? A LOT (Score 1) 68

The main premise, why "American beer is bad" comes from two sides:

  • 1. Central Europeans, who are the most avid beer drinkers and therefore most likely going to complain about "bad beer", typically prefer lager beer. So you have the choice between cheep American lager beer and expensive craft beer.
  • 2. For some reason Americans like flavored hops, which is a big nono in Central Europe. So even the few craft lager beers will not match their expectations.

Comment Re:Wait, what? (Score 0) 200

It's important to realize that the so-called far-left Democrats idealize Bolshevism while the far-right Republicans idealize Fascism, both of which are forms of Big Government Socialism.

So if the Democrats are in power and they want to increase the size and scope of government the Republicans will go along with it 80% of the time. Because they know they will eventually be back in power and have more tools of power to control.
They will balk the other 20% of the time so they still have something to run on and false promises to make to their voters.

The base of both parties is mostly against all of this.

Comment Re:Oh it's not feasable (Score 2) 194

Space Data Centers are in the same category as fully autonomous self-driving cars within eighteen months that he 'promised' in 2019.

You can watch the 'Autonomy Day' video on YouTube. People financed Model 3's on the promise of renting them as robotaxis while they were at work.

Physics is a hard stop on false promises.

It's OK to back difficult challenges with no underlying physical impossibilities that's engineering. Radiating heat into space is a physics problem.

I didn't believe the robotaxi promise then and I don't believe the space data centers claim now.

If there's a new topological physics breakthrough then let's see the paper and get the Nobel Prize gears turning because that would revolutionize technology on and off planet.

I'd love to see it but I don't believe it.
   

Comment Risky Business (Score 4, Interesting) 89

Reddit isn't wrong about bots but odds are what they really want is your identity. That earns money.

The trouble is people in Saudi Arabia will use old. to read about liberation topics or people in the US will read about drug topics, or whatever the mala prohibita are that will land you in prison for things that are perfectly legal in other jurisdictions.

Even people with accounts who read other subs logged in.

"Just create a new anonymous account" is what people will say who don't understand how identity correlation works. Sure there are ways that 0.0000001% of the population can manage securely, but that's not how this will go down.

The UK just arrested an American attorney who was critical of UK politics and they have multiple people in prison for clicking 'Like'. If you think they won't arrest somebody for reading the wrong sub, give it a few months.

Also, don't connect through Heathrow ever again.

Slashdot Top Deals

I consider a new device or technology to have been culturally accepted when it has been used to commit a murder. -- M. Gallaher

Working...