It's been widely reported. You could find it yourself, but you would continue to lie instead.

It's an ok way to open a shell.

You are a liar.

It's Windows.

For years, Microsoft used revenue as a metric to know if a feature was good or not. This gave them customer feedback, and they could adjust accordingly.

Around the time of Vista, it stopped working as a metric because everyone had already bought Windows. By that time, corporate motivation had changed, and the motivation of managers was to backstab each other as they climbed the corporate ladder. So they never really came up with another metric to determine if customers liked their product or not, they were too busy doing other things.

The reason the Linux Kernel (and open source in general) is such good code is because they fix bugs when they find them. This enforces a certain amount of quality to the structure and organization of the code, otherwise they would be spending all their time fixing bugs until they figured it out.

Consider a typical corporate bug tracker that is overflowing with bugs, the bug count always increasing. Inevitably this leads to a cludge, where the code is disorganized and almost unmanageable. Working through the code is like working through molasses. If they reversed the bug count vector, so it was decreasing (even slowly) instead of increasing, then soon the code structure would begin to get cleaner and cleaner as well. The correlation is strong.

So this is to Linus' merit, that he doesn't ignore bugs just because they are from AI. It will make the code cleaner.

This one goes to eleven, you impotent numbskull.

Sweet! I've also wanted Compiz to work well on Linux. Looks like it's shaping up to be a great distro.

It would be cool to see a 3D file browser, too.

Your post is an extreme example of Dunning–Kruger. Just because you know how to type doesn't mean you understand economics.

The market doesn't optimize for profit in the short term or in the long term.

In economics, there are two curves: a supply curve, and a demand curve. In a free market, they meet at equilibrium.

It's not about the USA. It is not about Trump. It is not about you. Try to not make every single situation America-centric, you self-centered twat.

A minority in Japan really really wants nuclear weapons. The majority doesn't. By "leaving the door open" she is able to appease the minority while not being rejected by the majority. Japanese politics is full of double-speak of this type. If you turned off your American-centric worldview, you might know this. Again: not everything is about you.

This is worth repeating. In addition, Google pushed people hard to install Chrome by nagging you every time you visited one of their websites.

I didn't realize it was so heavy.

I was going to say this is way too general, and AI involves many algorithms that are not LLMs.

Then I started thinking through the algorithms of the past, and many of them have indeed shown great promise in the beginning, then exponentially-increasing requirements.

Because of bureaucracy. Individuals all up and down the hierarchy are trying to meet arbitrary metrics set by someone who doesn't understand the situation. The ones who meet the metrics get promoted, even if the metrics make no sense.

Of course, there are smart scientists in China who try to do good research, but as is true everywhere, bureaucracy is a hindrance.

That is too optimistic on the listening.

A lot of people out there only heard "stay six feet away from people" and logicked, "What, a disease can only travel six feet then it drops dead?" No scientist said anything remotely close to that, but that is the reasoning people ended up with because they weren't listening at all.