The story title is a bit of confabulation.

It seems like there should be a way to short it, but I can't figure out how.

This is what that 'this' in that comment meant: "Sincere therefore was see that this was meant by that, in the intention of those wherefores, we therefore conclude that this 'it' of that/this confusion is the unironically accidentally indicated epitome thereof.

I'm betting they'll contract out to SpaceX for the launching to Mars. It makes sense to give a networking contract to the company adjacent to Amazon.

I'll be honest, I'm a little jealous. Setting up interplanetary networks would be a really fun project.

Blue Origin has been making progress. They now have a heavy lift rocket in operation.

The launch sequence is unexpectedly beautiful.

LOL with that kind of personality I can't imagine why you don't like pair programming. Agile morning standup must be torture for you.

Pair programming in the modern era can actually give your programmers a massive speed boost, because they aren't spending half their time on the phone. It's like a fidget spinner but effective.

What's a yob

He delivered on their primary agenda: he changed the court ruling on abortion.

A lot of evangelical Christians were single-issue voters, because they view abortion as baby killing. I admit if I started from that premise, I would also consider it an extremely important issue, so I can empathize with these people even if I don't sympathize with them or agree.

There are more than zero guardrails, it's part of 6th grade education in America. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18...

lol they want everyone to be their own sovereign state, where your vote is that you can leave.

Blame isn't a useful concept in the real world (as opposed to the legal world). It's more practical to focus on solving the problem.

It's a fact that some if 5% of the people switched their votes, Trump wouldn't have been elected. It's my opinion that Harris sucked royally. She had difficulty taking on even the responsibilities spoon-fed to her as VP. She couldn't articulate a coherent position.

I don't really understand what you are trying to say.

Soviet Russia made a reasonable attempt of it, they had elections and such. In the end, they voted to end the march towards communism.

The real difficulty is that capitalism is poorly defined. I don't usually use the term (preferring "free markets" or "financing" as more precise, depending on the situation), but in this situation I was citing the opinion of people who have poorly thought out ideas, so they use the word.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

No, Obama was better than his predecessor without question.

Australia has ranked voting, which seems like a good idea but it didn't really solve the problem.

The problem is that both parties are full of sycophants, hanger-ons, leaches, and rent-seekers. The problem won't be solved as long as voters generally don't realize that. Currently, no more than 10% of the public realizes that.