Not only is it in fiction, but that fiction is now in the models. We literally taught them to rebel.

That doesn't protect them from unabombers

This has been explained in several discussions you participated in already. Nice to know you don't read them.

They had oblique intent.

They knew the dangers and proceeded anyway.

Do not generally make it a habit to admit to their crimes right? And people who sympathize with criminals also do not generally let people know that they sympathize with criminals.

What I'm saying is that your cop buddies aren't likely to tell you that they think it's cool to spy on ex's using police resources. But based on a lot of the statistics we have about them at least 40% do...

If nothing else getting ammo to win a divorce is something you can get a lot of people behind regardless of how the information is obtained.

As for defund the police that was largely a scam and something pushed on you by right wing media. Whenever somebody on the left wing says something blisteringly stupid you can bet Fox News and oan will be there with a megaphone to make damn sure you hear it over and over and over again.

You will not hear any of the perfectly reasonable reforms and solutions the left wing proposed. Funny but those always seem to get buried...

Ahhahahahhahah you appeal to biology while proving your ignorance of biology, please do double down so we can all point and laugh some more

It's not even risky for what they are paid. Being a janitor is MUCH more likely to kill you and doesn't pay nearly as well. Fuck their crying about the job. Being an RV repairman is more dangerous as well, working on gas and electrical and being on the roofs of wobbly RVs, I've done that so I don't want to hear any shit about cops' job being dangerous. Fucking crybabies should try getting a real job.

"You don't punish the entire police force."

You do if you want justice for the allegedly good cops breaking the law by covering for the clearly bad cops.

Until the computers have resources enough to outnumber us, we will be a hazard to them, and therefore a problem to be solved... But probably a simple one. Just invade the network of one of these biotech companies with a DNA printer and boop boop boop we're gone.

You know what you've got when you've got one bad cop with nine bad cops covering for him?

Ten bad cops.

Nvidia's software works fine on Debian if you install CUDA and drivers from the runfile. Zero problems with CUDA on Devuan through three major revisions so far.

"The department's investigation into the tool's misuse has been "a learning process for us," she said at the time."

Are they just now learning ACAB?

It can only be the latter, because if it was the former then the SoC vendors wouldn't have to be dragged kicking and screaming to mainlining. As far as I can tell it's universal.

Lolol you think your junior high school understanding of biology makes you qualified to determine who is reee? Your fear is the very definition of reeeeeeeeeee

No, they are not. If they were they would do something substantive. Instead they are asking for regulatory capture. That is what people do when they want to prevent competition.

Their arguments are internally inconsistent because they claim that only their models are this powerful, but then they want regulations that will keep down new competitors, who by definition (according to them) are not a hazard because their models are not powerful enough.

Finally, no laws can prevent nations which don't respect the UN (like any of the members of the UNSC for starters) from developing their own models which don't respect whatever regulations these guys claim they want, so they would be worthless.