Comment The next CEO search (Score 1) 19
They are OK as long as the Chief People Officer spearheads the effort. I heard she's intimately familiar with the position.
They are OK as long as the Chief People Officer spearheads the effort. I heard she's intimately familiar with the position.
"Your feedback and contributions have been invaluable."
Were they invaluable? Now they are zero.
From what I have read and heard anecdotally from others, what you are describing is not a one-off. There are several businesses that take this approach, and (from what I gather) it tends to be most popular in sales departments.
It's called Stack Ranking and it causes problems when people need to cooperate (like on programming teams), because people won't cooperate, they'll backstab each other. It's entirely counterproductive.
It works ok on sales teams when salespeople operate independently of each other. (ie, the more they work together, the less it works).
None of which are defined with the authority of the copyright owner.
LOL no doubt that will hold up in court. The law doesn't say it has to be defined with the authority of the copyright owner.
The part about authority means that even if you manage to break the copy protection (which you have by switching your user agent), if you do that without authorization, then you've broken the law.
Again, this is one of the problems with the DMCA.
I believe California employment laws are no pushover
They are weak. Basically, you can fire someone for any reason (or no reason), except for specifically protected classes (such as race, gender, whistleblowing). Firing someone because you think it will bring publicity? No problem! Welcome to California.
Pro-Russian people (MAGA's) insist that Ukraine invaded Russia somehow.
MAGAs started opposing Ukraine because they wanted Biden to look bad. It's definitely a case of motivated reasoning (to the extent that there is any logic at all).
Uncompensated overtime? Just Say No.