Why wouldn't I say it may cure cancer? You are obviously painfully unaware of the many benefits AI has already afforded and have no understanding of it at all. This is not to say that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, because nobody knows if that will turn out to be true or not at this point, but if you really think AI is all downside and zero benefits you are woefully ignorant. I personally believe it *might* destroy the human race, but I've been reading a lot of Slashdot comments today so I'm having a hard time deciding if that is a plus or a minus.

That number pales in comparison to the crimes commited by the FBI, CIA, NSA, DEA, et. Al. Learn some history bootlicker.

Understanding C well would be a reason to learn and use Rust, not a reason to use C. You clearly don't understand software development very well. The right tool for the right job. In 2026 C is sometimes the right tool for some jobs, but certainly not for this job.

Chrome isn't Open Source, but Chromium is the Open Source code that Chrome is based upon.

I am 100% against flock cameras, but that doesn't mean your statement is true. While I agree that typically people will still steal even with flock cameras, if they catch people doing so and they go to jail they are not able to steal more. So while the a priori effect is negligible, that doesn't mean they can't reduce theft. The problem is that even if they do the loss of freedom from mass surveillance is not compensated for by the few cases where it makes things marginally better in a few select cases, especially given that it is abused already and this is documented fact.

There already *are* such limits, and those of us that didn't have the foresight to know they would be ignored should have figured out by now that "strict limits on access" are meaningless. The *only* solution is to make gathering of the data illegal, because once the data has been gathered it can be abused, which is to say it *will* be abused, and *is* being abused.

Those who are willing to sacrifice everybody's freedom for more convenience parking the car they are lucky enough to be able to afford deserve neither freedom nor convenience.

The real danger of discussing an AI kill switch is that it creates and enables the delusion that such a thing is possible. This is absurd. AI is code and is not a single instance, runtime, or platform. Not only is it true that there is no way to implement it in a single model, or a few select models, the Pandora's box has already been opened. An AI kill switch is technologically impossible to implement, and there is no way to universally legislate or enforce legislation even if it was possible.

Try googling "irony". What am I saying. You don't know how to Google. My mistake.

This is what makes you a troll. You are unwilling to learn, and want to blame me for your unwillingness to do so. I'm not "calling you an idiot", I pointed out that you are, in fact, an idiot, if only because you are trying to double down on your ignorance and claim that it is up to me to explain to you why even after I have walked you through the steps you could taketo do it. You have now spent far more time closing you are right when you aren't than it would to understand why you are completely wrong. You will never succeed in life because you prefer sticking to making stupid comments over learning why you keep making stupid comments.

Go to gemini.google.com and enter "Why am I wrong to think that the AI industry pays other electricity prices than locals and gets other power lines when building data centers. And noise follows an inverse power law, so If you're not living on site, you won't hear anything in your home." There you will find an extremely long explanation to help you understand that you have literally no clue what you are talking about. I considered posting the results here, but there is literally so much you don't have a clue about that I would have to spend about 10 minutes to try to include it here, even just with copy and paste. Just accept that you have no understanding of the issues, and if there were no issues then nobody would have any problems with them in their neighborhood. In fact they would *want* them in their neighborhood. The fact that you think you are super smart, and don't need to do any research, without being able to figure out that last point is what makes you a complete idiot.

Off you go now little troll ...

No, it means you stop eating at McDonald's.

Its already over priced and its complete shit for you in almost every conceivable way. If your options are Eat McDonald's or die a slow death of starvation ... starvation is still the better choice.

Do your own research. It isn't my job to help you avoid making stupid comments.

You should probably do a modicum of research before commenting. I'm reminded of the old adage commonly falsely attributed to Lincoln or Twain: "It's better to be silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt."