Copilot becomes an evening contributor on a self-proclaimed "for entertainment purposes only" network, bringing "fair and balanced" news, opinions and information
"It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don't rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk."
The Privacy Act of 1974 technically restricts what personally identifiable information (PII) a federal agency can collect and retain.
Is that just directly or does it include data that can be purchased through third-part brokers? 'Cause some agencies seem to be using the latter.
It is illegal* to ask if candidates are married.
It is illegal* to ask if candidates have children.
It is illegal* to ask if candidates live with their parents.
* In America.
As opposed to half-assed improvements? Obviously updates/patches pushed to end-users should be "production ready". It's sad that it had to be specifically stated that Microsoft actually worked on these. I imagine people will remain dubious anyway.
So much better than those updates designed to do the opposite.
So it's ironic that some (but not all) users reported instead that the update "blocks users at the door, refusing to install or crashing midway through the process."
Ironic? Yes. Surprising? No.
Last time I checked, my vehicle is not a legal entity that can be cited for infractions. Whatever person is sitting behind the wheel of that vehicle is not known by a camera. I can't believe these things haven't been totally obliterated in court. In my state, the tickets you get from these things are actually from 3rd parties contractors who run them, and try to sound very official, but they are not actual summons through a court.
Maybe Amazon can use drones to deliver things
"Whatever the generative AI tool gives you
You have to read the cases to make sure what you are citing is accurate."
Since the issue seems to be attorneys not reviewing/checking their sources, I suggest the punishment be along those lines. Perhaps a week of extensively fact-checking *everything* the President says, for each offense.
Ugh, manor = manner. Typo...
Makes me think of this from Galaxy Quest:
Alexander: Could they be the miners?
Fred: Sure. They're like, three years old.
Alexander: MINERS, not MINORS.
Fred: You lost me.
Maybe escalated. I don't think any trajectory that ends under 6% can really be called skyrocketing.
Maybe they're using Trump 2024 election logic where winning the popular vote by (literally) 1.47% is a "landslide" and a mandate.
Latency is what kills the Office365 license check.
Or Outlook's location check.
IBM Teams Up With Arm To Run Arm Workloads On IBM Z Mainframes
Tuesdays and Thursdays will be Leg days.
And the Spacex program will have expendables on board, because they move fast and break things.
Cool. How many expendables will fit?
Which Apollo misson was was "fly the talking meat by the Moon in a can"?
You don't seem to understand the word "similar".
It absolves them of liability. If there is a law they have to validate age (even if it is ineffective and easily worked around by minors), and they are doing whatever silly thing they need to do to be compliant, then they have shielded themselves from liability.
By being involved in the process they can steer things to something easy and affordable to implement on their end. Make it work the way they want to (scan an ID, have AI look at their face, DNA test, measure their height - whatever method they're specifically wanting to do is why they are funding this and pushing for it).
One can't proceed from the informal to the formal by formal means.
