Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:That's not what the law says (Score 1) 66

So the current situation is that Tick Tock is in violation of the law (and has been for the past several months). If I were in their position I would be considering going for some kind of an estoppel order to permanently void the law since it's being (not) enforced on a simply arbitrary basis by an individual's whims of the moment.

You already said that the law is not being followed. What makes you think another law will solve that problem? There is paper and there is human desire. Human desire is no longer bound by paper. Adding more paper will NOT help in this situation.

Comment Re:Why Is Brave Not More Popular (Score 1) 228

Probably because it used to dabble in crypto-currency behind the scenes. I am not certain about its crypto stance right now, but if it is there still, then at least it is fully publicly acknowledged... but the image was tainted with their initial dishonesty. Get past that and you may have a popular browser on your hands.

Comment Re:If I may- (Score 1) 228

He was likely paid by Google to try to influence people away from using Firefox because Firefox is able to run uBlock Origin which appears to be able to bypass all of their restrictions on skipping ads.

Nothing interesting here, just Google being the typical large and arrogant tech company.

Comment Re:Why tell stupid lies? (Score 1) 228

Why are you wasting your time telling obvious, silly lies in a place where people who know what happened are all over?

Normally, I love reading the remarks that caused these type of replies. It is frequently hilarious. In this case, I am confused. What obvious and silly lie was told?

They employed the inventor of fucking JavaScript, and they fired him because they didn't like the way he voted.

It was worded 'harshly', but I am not seeing the obvious and silly lie? (interesting, the CAPTCHA is not an actual word today: verland)

Comment Re:The fact that you only see this as worrisome (Score 1) 284

But now I do understand a bit as I talk to fairly sane, otherwise rational people who believe trump is doing God's work.

These are people who do not have external standards to measure against... despite following a book that has very clear written standards that they claim to be measuring against. They are weak and useless.

Comment Re:Not a problem (Score 1) 133

Too true... however, it makes finding good music infinitely harder as AI is incapable of doing things that make the song special and unique while maintaining artistic integrity.

Take Creep by Radiohead. If they didn't have that guitar string scratching thing in it at one point, would the song have been as good? Once you hear that, you can almost toss out the rest of the song.

Wait, am I arguing against common music here?

Comment Re:The problem with this... (Score 1) 70

Imagine buying a brand-new EV, where the battery is 3/4 the cost of the vehicle. Then you do this "battery swap" and get a *used* battery pack that's been god knows where.

You REALLY can't think of a way for this happen reasonably? Seriously?

Look, I apologize for the derisive response. It is not helpful.

You appear to be fixated on "owning" the battery. That is fine, you can keep your ultra special brand spanking new battery and even pay to have it recycled and replaced. You are not required to exchange it. You can keep recharging it all that you want... until it dies. Then, you can buy another brand spanking new battery for full price while also paying the disposal price for the now-old and used battery.

Or, you can start out with one of the "battery time" batteries that are made to be swapped out. You only pay for the first battery, but you don't have to pay for disposal or for a "new" battery. You only pay for the electricity used with a small fee on top to cover the eventual recycling of the batteries over time.

So you get to work with your toddler style ownership if you want, but I am betting that eventually, most everyone will choose the swappable batteries as the costs of recycling and repurchasing becomes too much for the average person to want to deal with. The capital costs are killer to own rather than swapping in a system.

In China, there are moped style scooters with swappable batteries. There is a vending machine where you put your uncharged batteries in and pull out charged batteries. The batteries are recycled once they fail to charge over 90% (I don't recall the exact number).

Who cares if the battery case is scuffed as it is never seen except when exchanging.

Comment Re:Such efforts usually or always fail (Score 2) 70

Every roadblock you have mentioned is merely a prejudiced perspective that needs to be overcome. There was not a single technical issue mentioned.

My sanity may be questioned, but seriously folks, wake the fuck up. Y'all are acting insane. Battery swapping *IS* the way forward until the tech changes.

Slashdot Top Deals

Physician: One upon whom we set our hopes when ill and our dogs when well. -- Ambrose Bierce

Working...