Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Its really all about logistics (Score 3, Interesting) 28

Mars will likely require the following infrastructure: space station in earth orbit, space station in lunar orbit, lunar base, space station in orbit around mars, and then a mars base. Like military operations, it's all really about logistics. Can we squeak in a direct recon flight, sure, but more serious stuff will require infrastructure.

Toss in some local acquisition and processing of resources at some point. Ex H2 O2 -- for air, water, and fuel.

Comment Humans are more capable on site .... (Score 4, Interesting) 28

A human on site is far more capable than a robot. A robot will have far greater endurance at a site. Which is better depends on the mission, the tasks to be done.

Also a big part of these missions is to develop and test the tech necessary for manned missions.

Comment Frustration indexes have been used before ... (Score 2) 21

Frustration indexes have been used before in other customer facing industries, in particular to determine if users are being over served or under served. A certain level of dissatisfaction is expected, if it's too low then too many resources are being spent per user. Ie wasting money. Maximizing revenue often involves a non-zero frustration index. Seriously, service that is too good is sometimes considered a bad thing.

Comment They want current contact info (Score 1) 40

"South Korea's law actually requires Apple to re-verify someone's age annually."

So they're concerned that, as time passes, a devious person will... grow younger?

They probably want a current verified ID, with the current address and contact info that comes with that. Ie. Also 15, 18, and 21 years olds may be required to provide different levels of info.

Comment Re: Not diversity hires (Score 1) 183

KBJ has undergrad and JD degrees from Harvard, where she edited the Law Review, clerked for Breyer, and was a distinguished federal district and circuit court judge on the D.C. Circuit, the country's "second highest court." THAT'S who you're using as your example of an underqualified diversity hire?

Actually, academia and political appointments tend to work very different from NASA. So that's not quite an all other things being equal comparison.

Comment We need to make the lawyers pay the penalty (Score 3, Insightful) 48

We need to increase the penalties

I think we first need to be sure that the lawyers actually paid the penalty themselves, and not passed it on to the client as some sort of expense. And if not passed on to the client, ensure that the penalty is not a business expense they can deduct.

Comment Re:Owner must prove its a derivative (Score 1) 125

The above is subject to misinterpretation. The copyright owner must demonstrate its a derivative and win in court. Owner must prove guilt, publisher does not need to prove innocence.

It a civil case you don't need to prove "guilt", just that it is more likely than not that they looked at your source.

No, it more like "preponderance of the evidence". Which is certainly looser than "beyond a reasonable doubt", but far more than "more likely than not".

For that reason, any competitive proprietary project coded with an LLM can be credibly accused of being a derivative work, as the preponderance of circumstantial evidence would point to the LLM being "tainted" by the OSS project, unless you could demonstrate that it was excluded from the training data.

It's not quite that simple. One would need to establish that the AI has not learned general concepts from its training, rather that it is directly transforming the copyrighted source code. Like a human, an AI, will be able to learn concepts from copyrighted material and then be able to write their own unique implementations of those concepts. All of our data structures textbooks are copyrighted works, yet we are free to implement the concepts we have learned.

Comment Its about money, not energy source (Score 2) 97

I am glad for every cent that does not fuel Exxon and the likes and the corruption of democracy that follows from that dependency.

Better renewables than fossil fuels, but better Exxon than Putin. Hopefully Germany learned from that mistake.

Also, Exxon is an energy company, they will be happy to sell you renewable energy in the future, so you are likely not done with them.These energy companies just want to make money. While fossil fuels are the most profitable that will be their focus. However when renewables are more profitable these same energy companies will switch their focus to renewables. Its about the money, not the energy source that gets them that money.

Comment Re:It's easy to understand how this is happening (Score 5, Insightful) 48

Anyone charging hundreds of dollars per hour for their work had better damned well be doing it. Not only should they be sanctioned by the courts, but they should face criminal fraud charges. If the courts want to put a stop to this they had better get serious now and stop handing out slaps on the wrist. Multiply the sanctions by an order of magnitude and give opposing counsel a 30% finder's fee to encourage additional vigilance and it'll quickly stop.

Slashdot Top Deals

My idea of roughing it turning the air conditioner too low.

Working...