Comment Re:Did they find.. (Score 2) 28
..the secret nazi moon base with space nazi's?
Spazis?
..the secret nazi moon base with space nazi's?
Spazis?
"South Korea's law actually requires Apple to re-verify someone's age annually."
So they're concerned that, as time passes, a devious person will... grow younger?
They probably want a current verified ID, with the current address and contact info that comes with that. Ie. Also 15, 18, and 21 years olds may be required to provide different levels of info.
KBJ has undergrad and JD degrees from Harvard, where she edited the Law Review, clerked for Breyer, and was a distinguished federal district and circuit court judge on the D.C. Circuit, the country's "second highest court." THAT'S who you're using as your example of an underqualified diversity hire?
Actually, academia and political appointments tend to work very different from NASA. So that's not quite an all other things being equal comparison.
Bahrain and Dubai
Given domestic production levels and an interruption of international deliveries from Amazon, Bacon and Liquor prices must be sky rocketing.
Spacecraft haven't flown to the moon though. You need air to fly.
NASA disagrees.
"For the first time in more than 50 years, astronauts on a NASA mission are bound to fly around the Moon after successfully completing a key burn of Orion’s main engine."
https://www.nasa.gov/news-rele...
We need to increase the penalties
I think we first need to be sure that the lawyers actually paid the penalty themselves, and not passed it on to the client as some sort of expense. And if not passed on to the client, ensure that the penalty is not a business expense they can deduct.
The above is subject to misinterpretation. The copyright owner must demonstrate its a derivative and win in court. Owner must prove guilt, publisher does not need to prove innocence.
It a civil case you don't need to prove "guilt", just that it is more likely than not that they looked at your source.
No, it more like "preponderance of the evidence". Which is certainly looser than "beyond a reasonable doubt", but far more than "more likely than not".
For that reason, any competitive proprietary project coded with an LLM can be credibly accused of being a derivative work, as the preponderance of circumstantial evidence would point to the LLM being "tainted" by the OSS project, unless you could demonstrate that it was excluded from the training data.
It's not quite that simple. One would need to establish that the AI has not learned general concepts from its training, rather that it is directly transforming the copyrighted source code. Like a human, an AI, will be able to learn concepts from copyrighted material and then be able to write their own unique implementations of those concepts. All of our data structures textbooks are copyrighted works, yet we are free to implement the concepts we have learned.
I am glad for every cent that does not fuel Exxon and the likes and the corruption of democracy that follows from that dependency.
Better renewables than fossil fuels, but better Exxon than Putin. Hopefully Germany learned from that mistake.
Also, Exxon is an energy company, they will be happy to sell you renewable energy in the future, so you are likely not done with them.These energy companies just want to make money. While fossil fuels are the most profitable that will be their focus. However when renewables are more profitable these same energy companies will switch their focus to renewables. Its about the money, not the energy source that gets them that money.
Anyway, how is ol' Boris doing?
We had the good sense to not put him back in again. He's relegated to being some TV personality on crappy entertainment channels, not senile dictator in chief.
My idea of roughing it turning the air conditioner too low.