Comment Re:Anyone is surprised about this? (Score 1) 51
Liberated from the rails at last! Free East Palestine!
From Pittsburg to the Lake!
Liberated from the rails at last! Free East Palestine!
From Pittsburg to the Lake!
Remember when the internet was the best communications tool ever devised by man instead of just another way to funnel advertising to you and a mechanism to control what you are allowed to speak about? I do, too.
How many companies used llama instead of paying OpenAI for API access?
If Meta saw OpenAI as a market competitor then denying them revenue is a cunning move.
Especially if llama isn't Meta's core competency but ChatGPT is OpenAI's.
Maybe even legal in that aspect, though they both seem super guilty of not paying for copyrighted material.
As I said, as your positions get harder and harder to find any support for, your posting has turned increasingly angry. Fun game—go through your last 50 posts and see how many different people you called stupid?
I can understand that patriotic Americans pledge allegiance to uphold the flag and constitution and all that.
Sure, that's a common usage of the word pledge, but again, it's hardly exclusive. Pledge just don't have the connotation of "charity" in general usage in the United States.
Pretty interesting the Australian English has a very different connotation! Pledge is a common word in the states.
Some American examples of pledge in the public discource:
“I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people” FDR
Abstinence pledges: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
Pledge is the process (and the person! "The pledge had to drink 5 beers...") that first-year college students who join a fraternity or sorority go through
and more wedding vows than I care to read or quote!
etc
Gweihir is kind of infamous for refusing to admit that LLMs have any possible usage or that anyone is using them in a productive capacity today. His posts have been becoming increasingly strident of late.
The kicker is AGI. I'm not sure that with a definition that matches the acronym that it's even possible, yet some companies claim to be attempting it. Usually, when you check, they've got a bunch of limitations in what they mean. A real AGI would be able to learn anything. This probably implies an infinite "stack depth". (It's not actually a stack, but functionally it serves the same purpose.)
I don't like the term "AGI" because it's still nebulous and means different things to different people. The shifting window of vocabulary meanings in the AI field is rough. In the 1980s people regularly talked about chess as an AI problem. Now you can find plenty of people who say that's not AI. Ditto for Go (once Go became a defeated AI problem, it suddenly is no longer worthy of being considered AI). All the things I learned when I took an AI class ~25 years ago are now often derided as not AI (neural networks, A* and other search trees algorithms, etc).
There's a group of people who want to continue to goal shift until the only goal is "human intelligence" and if it's not human intelligence, it's not AI.
I think the definition of "AGI" = "Ability to learn" anything is close. But, can your average human learn anything? I'm not so sure.
Does it matter if the same AI program can answer math questions (or protein folding, whatever) AND plan a warehouse robot travel route AND summarize legal documents?
For now at least, throwing more people-time, processing time, and processing capacity at these models does seem to make a big difference. I've been playing around with some downloadable models, and this technology is improving so quickly. I can't imagine what it will be like in 2 years or 5 years or 10 years or 20 years.
I would bet on Zuckerberg over Gweihir.
A scientific paper featuring an AI-generated image of a rat with an oversized penis was retracted three days after publication
If O'Reilly ever publishes a book on e.g. ChatGPT, this needs to be the cover.
To get over my fear of AI I will have to go watch a parody song about hillbilly Harry Potter on youtube.
I've seen that. It's pretty fun. I would, unironically, watch that spinoff.
In English that word is used in conjunction with donating the charity. This is just him investing for a return.
While you can use the word "pledge" to refer to a promised future donation to a charity (see, e.g., "pledge drive"), it's not an exclusive meaning. For native English speakers, I would not say that "pledge" particularly brings up the connotation of charity. Pledge just means to promise or vow something. "I pledge allegiance..." or "I pledge my support for this candidate." Etc.
see subject.
Coding is to CS as math is to Physics.
Software engineering is building the supercolliders for physics.
Meanwhile we have LLM's declaring themselves Mechahitler.
Good job University of No Job Placement.
(yeah, some Universities have been giving CS degrees for HTML and MS Office)
Good one.
If we can't move the planet by then we've gone extinct too.
According to the Timcast review (spoilers) he never says either phrase in the movie.
Just some dope making posters, reportedly.
Apparently all the immigrant and Israel propaganda stuff is fake too.
Marketing Buzz achieved - don't believe anybody without verifying.
What is the current total Federal budget for science across all departments?
We have record homelessness, addiction, child trafficking, and a curiosity about the earliest moments after the Big Bang, if that even exists.
Oh and not enough electricity for humans and AI aspirations.
Given limited funding we need to prioritize.
Cutting the War Department funding in half would be another good move.
By all means if this can be philanthropically endowed, like the Simons Observatory, that would be fantastic.
And where are the Oil Sultan countries on this? Muslims used to be the very best Astronomers in the world.
So no citation then?
I am more bored than you could ever possibly be. Go back to work.